360 likes | 523 Views
Colorado. Case Study. PL566 Remedial Assistance Project. Frank Riggle Colorado Assistant State Conservationist Water Resources. The Dam. Built with PL-566 in 1971 Flood Control Crest to reservoir: 30’ Structural Height: 70’ Structure length: 490’. Holes. Intelligent Rodents???.
E N D
Colorado CaseStudy PL566RemedialAssistanceProject Frank RiggleColorado Assistant State ConservationistWater Resources
The Dam • Built with PL-566 in 1971 • Flood Control • Crest to reservoir: 30’ • Structural Height: 70’ • Structure length: 490’
Accelerating Problem • Holes along crest increased in the past 4-5 years • Colorado State Engineer’s inspection started in 1991 • NRCS State Engineer’s review mid 1990s • Northern Plains Engineering Team Review 1/2004
Because of the worsening condition of the dam and a concern with dam safety: The Colorado State Engineer issued the sponsors a breach order in March 2004 Breach Order
OPTIONS ??? • Met with sponsors and State Engineer • Discussed needs and strategy • Initiated Formal Engineering Investigation
Why is the dam cracking? • Extended drought? • Poor operation and maintenance? • Poor construction? • Engineering and design oversight?
Investigation • Investigation Engineering Team included members from Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska • Site Visit - Visual Examination • Excavated Exploration Trenches • Interviews with NRCS State Engineer, former NRCS District Conservationist, and Colorado State Dam Safety Engineer about involvement during construction • Examination of construction drawings, job diaries, soil engineering report, geology report, drill logs, profile and cross section drawings,
½” – 3” diameter holes became evident in early 1980’s, and are considerably larger today View of embankment with sink hole in foreground, shows developing pattern of holes along crest.
Site Survey/Excavation • Holes, cavities, and cracks of significant size observed • Located in a line along the crest • Lined up in three distinct areas perpendicular to axis of dam • Lines of holes were on either side of principal spillway, and the third close to auxiliary spillway • Virtually all holes located on upstream half of embankment
Test pit dug over hole shows crack at depth • Bucket width approximately two-feet • Yellow soil is paint used to reveal crack while digging.
Emergency Action Plan • Breach Inundation Study • NOAA • Monitor precipitation • Monitor dam when rainfall >2” • Reverse 9-1-1 • Brief County and City Emergency Staff
The filter has not been contaminated with piped soil material.
Engineer’s Report • Cause of cracking/cavities differential settlement of upstream embankment and at the steep abutments and principal spillway along upstream edge of cutoff trench • Holes and cavities are surface expressions of cracks in compacted earthfill • Transverse cracks represent the most serious concern regarding safety of dam • Responsibility for problem can be attributed primarily oversights and/or misjudgments during design, and construction of original embankment • Underestimating collapse potential of sandy alluvium • Decision to locate cutoff trench on dam centerline instead of near the upstream toe
Current Activities • Draft environmental assessment • Interagency review • Copies of draft to affected landowners • Final draft designs to Fort Worth for review