180 likes | 342 Views
New Technologies Land on Airport Pavements. Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference February 18-20, 2009. AAPTP Background. Cooperative Agreement FAA & AU Created in 2004 $2million/year $1.6 million for 3 year obtained Organized similar to TRB NCHRP 19 Projects funded
E N D
New Technologies Land on Airport Pavements Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference February 18-20, 2009
AAPTP Background • Cooperative Agreement FAA & AU • Created in 2004 $2million/year • $1.6 million for 3 year obtained • Organized similar to TRB NCHRP • 19 Projects funded • Future dependent upon New FAA Legislation in Congress
Obstacles for Technology • Lack of experience with technology • Aversion to risk • Differences between airport and highways • FAA lack of encouragement
Technologies Introduced • PG Binder Grading (04-02) • Superpave (04-03) • SMA (04-04) • Guidelines for Rubblization (04-01) • Longitudinal Joints (04-05)
Projects of Interest • HMA Airport Construction Best Practice Manual (05-01) • Techniques for Mitigation of Reflective Cracking (05-04) • Use of RAP in Airport Pavements (05-06)
Projects Underway • Life Cycle Cost Analysis For Airfield Pavements (06-06) • Non Coal Tar Based Fuel Resistant Sealers and Binders (05-02) • Techniques for Prevention and Remediation of Non-load Related Distresses (05-07 & 06-01) • Effect of De-icing Chemical on HMA Airfield Pavements (05-02)
Projects Underway (Cont.) • Non-destructive Testing to Identify Presence and Extent of Delamination of HMA Airfield Pavements (06-04) • Use of Recycled ASR PCC Materials in HMA (06-02) • Guidelines for Use of State DOT Specs (06-05) • Performance Base Specs for Airfields (06-3) • Assessment of Existing Overlay Design Procedures for Airfield Pavements (06-07)
Project 04-02 PG Binder Selection • Change from highways to airfield • Considerations for airfield use • Gross vehicle weights • Number of loads • Speed of Loadings • Wander • Use of pavement facility • Availability of required asphalt grade
PG Binder Selection Background • PG System Design based upon highway traffic and expected temperatures at the pavement site • Grades based upon same performance measurement at different temperatures • PG 64-22 represents a binder that provides satisfactory performance at a high temperature of 64 C and at a low temperature of -22C
PG Binder Selection Procedure • Convert aircraft weights into Equivalent Highway loads (EHE) • Select base temperature from LTPPBind 3.1 • Adjust for traffic and pavement location on facility • Check for availability within US
PG Adjustments *Polymer modified binders must have a minimum elastic recovery value of 60 % at 25 C, following procedures described in AASHTO 301.
Questions? www.AAPTP.US