1 / 15

Infrared Extraction Update

Infrared Extraction Update. L. Carr, D. Arena, A. Blednyk, S. Coburn, V. Ravindranath and NSLS-II Team NSLS-II EFAC Review 10-11 May 2007. Infrared Outline. NSLS-II Infrared beamlines and requirements: quick refresher Infrared Extraction: revised extraction geometry*

emil
Download Presentation

Infrared Extraction Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Infrared Extraction Update L. Carr, D. Arena, A. Blednyk, S. Coburn, V. Ravindranath and NSLS-II Team NSLS-II EFAC Review 10-11 May 2007

  2. Infrared Outline • NSLS-II Infrared beamlines and requirements: quick refresher • Infrared Extraction: • revised extraction geometry* • large gap dipoles (excellent long-wavelength performance). • 1st mirror heat load* • Performance Figures • Beamline locations (brief)* • Environment (noise: vibration, EMI, etc.) • stability taskforce & workshop requirements • Top-off issues* • Bunch structure(s) for timing * addresses specific EFAC concerns and recommendations

  3. mid-IRstandard port far-IRlarge port Science and IR Source Requirements • Biological , Chemical, Environmental, Materials, Space … • 4000 cm-1 (l=2.5 mm) to < 400 cm-1 (l=25 mm) • mid and far-IR microprobe • mid-IR chemical imaging (raster scanning -> area imaging) • Imaging needs an extended source to optimally illuminate. • Materials (especially under extreme conditions) • Mostly “single point” spectroscopy • high pressures and temperatures • laser pump-probe • cryospectroscopy • high magnetic fields, spin resonance • 4000 cm-1 down to ~ 2 cm-1 (l=5 mm)

  4. Mid-IR Extraction: Standard Dipole • Chamber with 24mm high interior • Plane 1st mirror, with slot • 14 mrad V (avg.) by 50 mrad H • small reduction in qV compared to internal toroidal mirror extraction • Collects dipole and 0° edge radiation • Other details to be determined: • required slot length to allow x-rays to pass • beam impedance • mechanical mirror mounting • mirror cooling (back or end surface)care to avoid sources of vibration Standard NSLS-II Dipole “conventional” extraction S. Coburn

  5. FIR and mm-wave Extraction: Large Gap Dipole Chamber Large Gap Dipole • Chamber with 78mm high interior • Plane 1st mirror, with slot • 42 mrad V (avg) by 50 mrad H • small reduction in qV compared to internal toroidal mirror extraction, but less risk from waveguide cutoff effects (shorter distance) • Collects dipole and 0° edge radiation • Other details to be determined: • required slot length to allow x-rays to pass • beam impedance • mechanical mirror mounting • mirror cooling (back or end surface)care to avoid sources of vibration Have adopted largest of proposed dipole designs View into exit port S. Coburn Special chamber construction S. Coburn e

  6. Mid-IR Brightness NSLS II VUV/IR

  7. Far-IR Brightness cutoff effect due to chamber shielding lc ~ (h3/r)1/2

  8. New extraction: Beam no longer at grazing incidence onto 1st collection/extraction mirror. Calculation with internal H2O cooling, no slot: Relative longitudinal error = 3 mm Relative transverse error = 8 mm Initial FEA Analysis of Surface Deformation 500ma, 3.6 GeV V. Ravindranath Conclusion: will need slot

  9. Locations for IR Extraction • Standard dipole Mid-IR ports: • can be placed in proximity to related science activities (not constrained by accelerator symmetry requirements). • Large gap dipole Far-IR ports: • Large gap dipoles limited to 3 symmetric locations around ring. Both dipoles in a DBA cell, but typically only 2nd dipole available for IR extraction (due to ID upstream of 1st dipole). • Plan to locate 1 large-gap dipole cell-pair downstream of RF straight section (no ID, can use both dipoles for IR). Result: maximum of 4 far-IR extractions.(prefer downstream of RF, not injection) • Beamline floor plans: TBD “exaggerated” NSLS-II with 3 long straights, showing a symmetric arrangement of large-gap dipole pairs. candidate location for large gap dipole cell

  10. IR Requirements for Stability Taskforce & Report Stability of electron beam through dipoles: • Specification request: • Position: 1 mm V, 3 mm H • Angle: 3 mrad V, 6 mrad H • Corresponds to 7% of beam size (compare to 10% overall NSLS-II specification). • Requirement defined to deliver: • minimum 300:1 S/N in worst-case-scenario • would be ~ 30X better than existing NSLS VUV/IR • frequency range up to 20 kHz. • Can benefit from even better stability (additional 30X will put noise near background for essentially all measurements).

  11. NSLS II Infrared Capacity • In most cases, 2nd dipole of DBA cell is potential IR extraction location. • Slot in 1st mirror should allow for a downstream soft x-ray (BM) beamline. • 3-pole wiggler & IR edge extraction probably incompatible (both a 0° and angular pattern approaching 1/g). • Mid-IR: plan to develop beamlines 5 beamlines on 3 separate extractions: • H = 50 mrad & V ~ 14 mrad (avg.) • Special chambers required, but otherwise standard dipole (flexibility). • Single extraction port can serve 2 or 3 microprobe endstations. • Or entire 50 mrad horizontal can serve a single FPA imaging spectrometer • 3 ports => 1 split into 3 microprobes, 2 for FPAs = 5 beamlines. Can add more ports for growth. • Plan to locate in proximity to other Biological / Imaging beamlines (e.g. mXRF, mXANES). • Far-IR / THz / mm-waves: plan to develop 3 beamlines on 3 separate extractions (max = 4): • H = 50 mrad & V ~ 42 mrad (avg.) • Special chambers and special large-gap dipole magnets • Single endstation per extraction. • Locations constrained by 3-fold ring symmetry and RF straight

  12. Top Off Issues • NSLS-II injection approximately once per minute: • expect some beam motion for ~ 1 second • IR spectrometer data collection “styles”: • long scan time, averaging many short (< 1 second) scans • raster scan imaging (~ 1 minute per point, but ~ 1000 points) • ultra-high resolution spectroscopy (> 5 minutes for single scan). • Software: • macros and VB scripts to monitor “beam available” signal, pause collections. (R. Smith: testing a script to see how 1 and 2 can be managed). • more work necessary for 3.

  13. RF Buckets, Bunches and Timing • Infrared has been one of the key users of the storage ring bunch structure for time-resolved studies (methods dependent on bunches themselves). • no benefit from crab cavities, indirectly from laser slicing (CSR) • not limited to IR … all techniques where beam is not resolvable and fast detection not sufficient. • Issues: • Bunch lengths (sBL for NSLS II will be 10s of picoseconds) • Pulse Rep. Frequencies (PRFs) & synchronization to mode-locked lasers • 499.7 MHz RF, ring circumference = 792m, harmonic number = 1320 ( = 2x 2x 2x 3x 5x 11) • Mode-locked Ti:sapphire prefers 76 to 82 MHz, 75 to 100 MHz for Nd:YLF, more options with fiber lasers • note: 500MHz/6 -> PRF= 83.3 MHz • Jitter (bunches relative to RF, to each other) below 10% of bunch RMS, especially for frequencies > 1 kHz. • sets NSLS-II RF phase system stability requirements – stringent, but possible. • Harmonic cavity effects, de-tuned operations, low-a lattices: Still to be investigated.

  14. Symmetric Fills and PRFs for NSLS-II h=1320

  15. Summary • Updated Infrared extraction • more conventional side-extraction, 1stplane mirror, with slot to allow x-rays through. • very large gap dipoles, unsurpassed far-IR performance for incoherent SR. • generally higher mid-IR brightness than existing NSLS VUV/IR, expect high stability too. • Capacity: • Plan to develop 3 extractions each (mid-IR & far-IR) during early phases of NSLS II operations. • corresponds to 8 beamline endstations, compare to existing 6 on NSLS VUV/IR • Potential for growth (especially mid-IR). • Stability: • Requirements to achieve S/N at least 30X better than NSLS VUV/IR. • More is better! • Pulse Repetition Frequencies (PRFs): • h=1320, booster at 1/5th for efficient filling of NSLS-II ring in top-off. • Needing more attention: detailed impact of top-off injection on various IR measurement methods.

More Related