260 likes | 288 Views
Medical Ethics - an overview. Dr Jeffrey Brennan FRACS. Ethics. Concept of doing good What is good?. Ranking a patient’s good. WHO Constitution 22 July 1946. Ultimate good - the “good of last resort” The good of the patient as a human person - “right to choose”
E N D
Medical Ethics - an overview. Dr Jeffrey Brennan FRACS
Ethics • Concept of doing good • What is good?
Ranking a patient’s good WHO Constitution 22 July 1946. • Ultimate good - the “good of last resort” • The good of the patient as a human person - “right to choose” • The patient’s particular good - the choice • Biomedical good
Ethics Concept of doing good Influences the examination of problems of:- • Moral worth • Blameworthiness, and • Community
Moral worth • Defined by capacity to suffer (ie to be able to be benefited or harmed) • Primary • Sentient person • Secondary • Family • Organ donor • Symbolic • Flag
Moral worth • May be dynamic • Move from primary to secondary and symbolic • Vegetative state
Blameworthiness • “morally acceptable” or “praiseworthy” option may not exist • Hemiplegia and allowing to die • Choice becomes the “least objectionable”, or least “blameworthy”
Community • Micro versus macro resource allocation • When does one supervene the other?
Erich Loewy We are a crisis oriented society - the very same patients who had no access to routine health care, who could not afford often …. food or warmth, are the object of vast …. efforts when they are found critically ill or …. dying from starvation or exposure. Problems of the Care of the Terminally Ill Textbook of Medical Ethics Plenum Publishing, New York, 1989
Ethics - models • Utilitarian - outcome is what counts • Consequences • John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) • Deontological - rule-oriented • Intentions • “categorical imperative” • Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)
Ethics - models • John Dewey - pragmatist • Appropriateness of specific actions to achieve specific goals • Rejects the notion of “intrinsic right” or “good” • Situation ethics • Fletcher • Each situation on its own merits
What is death? • Homeric tradition • Death is terrible and unconquerable • Shadows and waifs • Orthic-Pythagorean (& later Christian) • Immortal or resurrected soul • Plato, Socrates (hemlock), Jesus Christ
What is death? • Genetic (or species) survival • Life continues through offspring • Aristotle • Epicurean and Stoic • Personal extinction • +ve or -ve experiences constitute life
Attitudes to maintaining life • Vitalist • Non-vitalist • Refusal to examine
Vitalist • Life is good regardless of anything else • Where to draw line?
Non-vitalist • Life is a means, not an end in itself • An “instrumental” good • Life is a condition for experience • A bridge to an end beyond itself • When do experiences become only -ve? • When does hope for future +ve disappear?
Non-vitalist • Quality of life issues • Difficulty in avoiding paternalism • Problems of setting external standards • “Surrogate judgements” • Those closest to patient make decisions • “Substitute judgements” • When no surrogates available or are unreliable
Non-vitalist • Physician judging patients quality of life for them is often wrong • Pearlman, Speer. Quality of life considerations in geriatric care. J Am Geriatric Soc 31:113-30, 1983.
Refusal to examine • Technology is its own sufficient reason for use • “because we can” • Physicians become technologists
Duty • Duty to relieve suffering is a much more ancient and enduring duty of medicine than is the duty to prolong life • Amundsen DW. The physician’s obligation to prolong life: a medical duty without classical roots. Hastings Center 8:23-31, 1978.
Decision to limit treatment • Obligation to refrain from causing suffering • Obligation to sustain life • Wish to avoid “therapeutic belligerence”
At least four considerations • The immediacy of the treatment • The relievability of the suffering caused by the disease • The suffering entailed in the treatment • The patient’s ability for sustained understanding and cooperation with treatment
Talking to patients and families • Sick people are not simply well people carrying “the knapsack of disease” • Eric Cassel 1976. • Defies a stereotypic approach
Talking to patients and families • Should be gently led to bad news • Human understanding needed more than technical knowledge • Effort to “size-up the patient / family” and deliver a judgement as to capacity for receiving news
Descartes 1637 …..I am sure there is no one, even among those who practise it, who does not admit that what is known of it is almost nothing compared to what remains to be known, and that we could free ourselves of an infinity of illness…...if we knew enough about the causes and all the remedies with which nature has provided us.