460 likes | 555 Views
Preparing for the Financial Impacts of being a CDC Provider. Graeme Wickenden, CFO Villa Maria Leanne Bell, Finance Manager, Villa Maria Tri-State Conference 23 rd to 25 th February 2014. Agenda. Organisational Overview – Villa Maria National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS)
E N D
Preparing for the Financial Impacts of being a CDC Provider Graeme Wickenden, CFO Villa Maria Leanne Bell, Finance Manager, Villa Maria Tri-State Conference 23rd to 25th February 2014
Agenda • Organisational Overview – Villa Maria • National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) • Overview • Consumer Directed Care (CDC) • Overview • Trial Participation • Budgeting • Systems and Processes • Villa Maria’s Experiences
Organisational Overview and Structure • Celebrated 100 years in 2007 • Catholic ethos and background • Supports over 5000 persons • About 1200 employees and over 300 volunteers • Delivers 60 programs in over 42 locations across Victoria • Main operating segments: • Disability Services • Educational Services • Residential Aged Care and Retirement Services • Community Services • Direct Care
Villa Maria – Disability Services Overview Includes: • Group Activities during the week, both centre based and in the community • Individualised options to support people living in their home with a disability or in the community • 12 Shared Supported Accommodation houses for adults • Purpose built state-wide facility for ten people with ABI and complex medical needs • Five children’s respite houses • Flexible respite recreational activities – weekends, camps, holiday after school care for both children and adults • Case Management Total Annual Funding: $19m
Villa Maria – Community Care Services Includes: • Community Aged Care Packages (825) • Extended Aged Care in the Home (61) • Extended Aged Care in the Home – Dementia (37) • Assistance with Care and Housing for the Aged • Community Rehabilitation Centre • Dementia Specific Care • Carer Support Services • Respite programs, both day and overnight Total Annual Funding: $25m
NDIS Overview • The NDIS is a once in a generation economic and social reform which has been agreed to by all governments and will benefit all Australians • Social insurance that will cover the cost of care and support for people with permanent and serious disabilities • In 2011 Productivity Commission reported that the current disability system is “inequitable, underfunded, fragmented and inefficient” • In 2009 the ABS reported that 45% of people with a disability in Australia live in or near poverty
NDIS Overview Three key pillars underpin the NDIS design: Insurance Approach Choice and Control Community and Mainstream
NDIS Overview • Will fund individual support for people with a disability that involves more choice and control and a life-time approach to a person’s needs through individualised funding • The scheme will provide funding so people can get the care and support they need, based on their individual support needs, goals and aspirations. • Administered by the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) – an independent statutory agency established to implement the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS)
NDIS – The Change OLD Program 1 contracts Program 2 Funding and monitoring Program 3 Capped Funding Limited Choice Limited Control NEW Support Support Plan and Budget Support Support Individualised Funding Choice & Control Supports, not programs
NDIS – Support Provided Basic rules will define the types of supports funded: • Will fund “reasonable and necessary” supports • Reasonable and necessary supports should: • address the effect of an impairment on the individual’s capacity to undertake everyday activities, including participation in social and economic life • allow a person to achieve their goals, objectives and aspirations • Funding available through the Practical Design Fund
NDIS – Financial Considerations Financial Risk • Need to understand costs and set pricing accordingly • Move from payment in advance to payment in arrears, with working capital implications • Greater focus on Balance Sheet management to ensure solvency • The current regime of fixed maximum prices for NDIS supports in trial sites will end in mid-2014
NDIS – Financial Considerations Financial Risk (cont.) • The NDIA will continue to set individualised budgets • Will allow greater flexibility for participants to negotiate with providers about the quantity and type of supports they receive • Cashflow planning essential • Rationalisation of service providers – growth opportunities
NDIS – Financial Considerations Financial Risk (cont.) • Potential risk for reliance on a small number of high value clients • Marketing essential – service providers now competing against each other • Potential for acuity risk over time, with potential profitability implications • Administrative processes and supporting IT systems fundamental to success
NDIS – Systems and Processes System considerations • Track that what was planned to be delivered was delivered i.e. “buyer/seller” relationship • Participant’s plan and statement of support entered into the NDIA system • Unlike in previous service models (e.g. Day Programs), no obligation to provide planning for participants, nor manage the achievement of planned outcomes unless that’s what a provider has been engaged to do • Focus is on, did the provider deliver what they were engaged to do
NDIS – Systems and Processes System considerations (cont.) • The plan will specify agreed supports and funding required • Providers will need to report at least monthly to NDIA about the supports provided to each participant; whether they are fee-for-service or block or case-based funded • Providers will submit reports and lodge claims for payment to NDIA through the online provider portal
NDIS – Launch Site Update Some early data from the launch sites: • Average package costs about 30% higher than expected • Package costs were expected to be about $35,000 pa; after 3 month’s operation about $45,000 pa • Expected more than 2,200 people to have completed plans; to date less than a 1,000 have • These are early indicators only and need to be treated with caution. As more information becomes available a clearer picture will develop.
NDIS – Launch Site Learnings Common issues from launch sites: • Provider anxiety on price setting • Limited community understanding of the NDIS • Operational issues – understanding the NDISregistration process • Engagement of providers in the new process of planning and understanding how providers work with the Agency
CDC Overview • Aims to provide a consumer led and directed aged care service system • All new allocation required to be delivered on a CDC basis from 1st August 2013 • From July 2015 all packages will operate on a CDC basis • CDC allows consumers to have greater control and choice on: • type of care they receive, and • who will deliver that care • Consumers decide what level of involvement they wish to have in managing their package
CDC Overview Department of Health’s guiding principles that underpin the operation and delivery of CDC packages: • Consumer choice and control • Rights • Respectful and balanced partnerships • Participation • Wellness and re-enablement • Transparency
CDC – The Change OLD Service delivery, monitoring and reassessment Moving or Exiting – ongoing reassessment Contracts Care Plan on assessed needs Capped Funding Limited Choice Limited Control NEW Service delivery, monitoring and reassessment Moving or Exiting – ongoing reassessment Individual budget developed with consumer Setting goals, Care Planning Individualised Funding Choice & Control Supports, not programs myagedcare.gov.au
CDC Overview Key considerations for providers: • Quantifying admin tasks and overheads • Communicating to consumers about available brokered services and how to make choices that provide better quality of care and life • Rationalising suppliers while still maintaining choice, and establishing Supplier Agreements with them • Establishing operational structures and systems that are flexible enough to respond to consumer choice • Determining the margin to be applied to packaged care • Management of budget allocations that is transparent
CDC Overview • Funding still provided to the provider – not the consumer • Home Care Provider administers the package on behalf of the consumer: • transparent • meet quality & accountability requirements • Must have an individualised budget: • Consumer must be provided monthly Income & Expenditure Statement • Must include balance of funds
CDC Overview – Client Agreement • An agreement must be offered before the package commences • Must contain specific clauses covering: • Date care started • Explanation of security of tenure and any variation must be by mutual consent • Copy of consumer’s care plan and itemised fees payable and how they are calculated • Right to, and how to, complain without fear of reprisal, • Right to request copy of audited accounts
CDC Overview – Funding New Package Structure Rates as at August 2013
CDC Overview – Income Subsidy Optional Subject to Means Test where reduction and Income Tested Fee applies ITF Negotiated, maximum at 17.5% of the aged care pension plus 50% of other income Base Fee Fee for Service
CDC Overview – Budget Details • Format of the budget must be simple • If required, the provider must provide the budget in a language other than English • Budget must breakdown income and expenditure • Must be based on the care planning process • Must be developed in partnership with the consumer • Time period determined by provider and consumer (i.e. weekly, monthly, quarterly or annual)
CDC Overview – Budget Details • Income includes: • All government subsidies, including supplements • Any consumer contribution (i.e. care fee) • Expenditure includes: • Core advisory and Case Management services • Service and Support Provision and/or purchasing • Administrative Costs • Budget may (but not essential) include a Contingency • Provide for emergencies and unplanned events • Increased care needs • As a guide, DSS say should be no more than 10% of the total annual budget
CDC Overview – Budget Details Determining the Contingency: • Amount to be held for each consumer for unforseen circumstances (no greater than 10%) • A separate item should be set up for each consumer and shown on their statement. • As expenditure is made against it then the balance should be reported to the consumer • Cannot be pooled with other consumers
CDC Overview – Budget Details • Any unspent funds (including contingency) must be carried forward into the next month, quarter, year • Format can be negotiated e.g. hardcopy, email or web-based
CDC Overview – Setting the Margin Determining the Margin: • Need to model scenarios to ensure an appropriate margin is applied for future sustainability • Margin will form part of the overall admin expense charged to the consumer • If the budgeted margin is not being maintained then the admin rate will have to be reviewed to reflect a new cost structure
CDC Overview – Unspent Funds Treatment of unspent funds: • Remain with the consumerif moving to another package with the same provider • Remain with the providerif the consumer moves to another provider and can be used on other consumers or infrastructure purposes (unless otherwise negotiated) • Remain with the providerif the consumer dies or moves into residential care • Except, funds the consumer has contributed to the package must be returned to the consumer or their estate
CDC Overview – Building the Budget Managing individualised budgets: • Budgets set by each consumer for the care needs required based on the consultation process and their list of required services. • Agree on the budget period, e.g. Weekly, monthly, quarterly or annually • A separate consumer "ledger" should be kept which carries the consumer’s budget and records actual expenditure against each budget
CDC Overview – Building the Budget Managing individualised budgets: • Monthly reporting of the actual expenditure against the budget • Show any variations and provide explanations • Make any necessary amendments to the package at next review date, with corresponding budget amendments
CDC – Systems and Processes System Requirements • Need to provide individualise budgets with daily, weekly and monthly views • Planned and Actual income tracking required • Statement reporting of client leave entitlements, daily rates and episodes • Capacity to set-up and manage the DSS Planning Regions and Special Need allocations
CDC – Villa Maria’s Preparation • Previous dependency on brokerage model • Identified two years ago the need to changedue to Productivity Commission report then subsequent LLLB • Have created Villa Maria Direct, our in-home service • Building up Fee for Service clients • Implementing systems to support this (CareLink+) • Steering Committee established to monitor and resource the project
CDC – Villa Maria’s Experience • Participated in CDC Trial • Review of traditional case management model to determine unit costs of activities • Individualised budget development • Supporting staff, consumers and service providers about what consumer self management and coordination of services means • Learning experience for staff about managing consumer expectations under CDC • Learning experience for the consumers about what they can do under a CDC package
CDC – Villa Maria’s Preparation • Modeling management structures to identify most efficient and cost effective • Shift from case management to service coordination • Developing standardised pricing for services • Undertaking costing analysis to identify breakdown of costs • Identify the margin • Same process for NDIS and CDC
CDC – Villa Maria’s Preparation • Established two taskforces (NDIS and CDC) to oversee preparation • Various staffing structures identified • Modeling in Calumo • Calumo is data repository we use for our management reporting • Provides the ability to quickly develop various scenarios
Villa Maria’s Systems Experience • Key requirement to have an IT solution that addressed both the Disability and Home Care requirements • Disability Services previously dependent on Excel spreadsheets in MS SharePoint • Inefficient • Open to human error • Undertook a complete review of our Client Management System requirements
Villa Maria’s Systems Experience • Comprehensive Requirements Analysis completed • Reviewed various solutions and reference tested • Developed detailed Business Case for Board approval • Established a governance framework • Developed project plan identifying involvement across various areas and resourced accordingly • Currently preparing for rollout concurrently across Disability, Community and Home Care
Villa Maria’s Systems Experience • Commitment from all areas for a “vanilla” implementation to reduce timeframes, i.e. no customisations • Key issue of developing interfaces to other systems: • payroll • financial • time & attendance/award interpretation
Villa Maria’s Systems Experience • Benefits: • Previous systems not sustainable under a CDC and NDIS environment • Elimination of inefficiencies and duplications • Automation of manual processes • Improved reporting and monitoring • Integration with other systems • Improved receivables and cash flow management • Compliance to CDC and NDIS requirements
Our Conclusions • Understanding of costs is critical • Identification of costs and correct allocation is fundamental to establishing viable budgets • Development of a model to provide costs review and margins • Need to ensure all costs are captured • understanding the real cost of delivering care, • calculating appropriate labour rates, overhead rates and margins
Our Conclusions Key learning: how to adjust to CDC model Organisations can build internal capacity to adjust to the new policy and funding model by ensuring: • financial recording systems are in place • relevant staff understand the overall costs of providing home care • regular reviews and evaluation of care levels are undertaken • increased attention to and awareness of costing activities • staff are supported and guided in their transition to CDC