1 / 9

Transmission Facility Ratings

Transmission Facility Ratings. Presentation to the Reliability Committee June 14, 2005. Today’s Agenda. Review and Vote: New Planning Procedure No. 7 (PP-7) - Including Appendices A and C Revised Operating Procedure No. 16 Supporting Materials: ISO Rating Collaboration Req’ts Report

emma-wood
Download Presentation

Transmission Facility Ratings

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Transmission Facility Ratings Presentation to the Reliability CommitteeJune 14, 2005

  2. Today’s Agenda Review and Vote: • New Planning Procedure No. 7 (PP-7) - Including Appendices A and C • Revised Operating Procedure No. 16 Supporting Materials: • ISO Rating Collaboration Req’ts Report - basis for new PP and some OP16 changes • SDTF Ambient Temperatures and Wind Velocities Report - documents “benchmark” values of PP-7

  3. April RC Meeting Recap Why have rating procedures ? • RTO Transmission Operating Agreement • Section 3.06(a)(v): “Each Participant Transmission Owner shall collaborate with the ISO with respect to: • the development of Rating Procedures • the establishment of ratings …” • NERC Reliability Std (FAC-004-0/FAC-008-1) • The Transmission Owner and Generator Owner shall each document its methodology used for developing Facility Ratings…

  4. April RC Meeting Recap Meeting the New Requirements… • New Planning Procedure No. 7 (PP-7) • “Best Practices” approach to rating procedures and ISO/SDTF review of NX-9 rating data • Roles/responsibilities of SDTF and ISO in each • CRPs rewritten as “Best Practices”, attached as appendices and maintained by SDTF • Provide for “Accepted Alternative Rating Practices” • Where are we now: • RC vote “to recommend support”

  5. April RC Meeting Recap Meeting the New Requirements… • Modifications to OP-16 • Enforce existing requirements • Involve ISO (and SDTF) in establishing ratings • Meet NERC Reliability Standard FAC-009-1, Establish and Communicate Facility Ratings • Where are we now: • RC vote “to recommend support”

  6. Since April Addressed RC Comments on PP-7: • References, add NERC Reliability Standard FAC-008-1 • Section 1.4, reworded ISO Responsibilities • Section 1.6 (new), addressed static and dynamic ratings • Attachment 1 (new), provided repository of “Accepted Alternative Rating Practices” • Appendix A, prepared report documenting temperature statistics and wind velocities, use of a single ambient temperature for all NE, and choice of Hartford data as being representative of all NE • Appendix C, clarified that methodology applies to both underground and submarine cables

  7. Since April NERC Reliability Standards: • Reviewed PP-7 for conformance with FAC-008-1, Facility Ratings Methodology (will replace FAC-004-0) • Section 2.5, revised to clarify actions, responsibilities and timelines Eliminated Duplicative Requirements • Refers to OP16 for periods for which Summer and Winter ratings apply • Refers to OP19 for time durations to be used in calculating and applying Short- and Long-Time Emergency ratings

  8. Ambient Temperatures and Wind Velocities Report • Documents Ambient Temps and Wind Used • Reaffirms Established Ambient Temperatures • 1975-2004 vs. 1905-1970 Hartford area data: same result • Hartford area similar to 1975-2004 average of 8 locations • Data provides no basis for carving NE into well-defined temperature zones • Largest temperature differences up to 3 to 4 °C • Affect 115kV line ratings by <2%; 345kV line ratings by <4%

  9. PP-7 Implementation Schedule NERC FAC-008-1 Compliance Date NPCC Compliance Audit expected ISO Initiates Request for MP Rating Methodologies [2.5.1] ISO Reviews MP Responses, Solicits SDTF Advice [2.5.5, 2.5.7] 60 days Complete PP-7 Appendices SDTF Recommendations To ISO [2.5.5] ISO Acts on Recommendations: • Approve and Record Accepted Alternative Rating Practices • Initiate Disagreement Discussions [2.5.6] MP Responses Due: • Methodologies • Inputs/Assumptions • Differences from Best Practices • Schedule to Conform Or Justification for Practice [2.5.5 thru 2.5.7] PP-7 Appendices Approved and Posted

More Related