1 / 21

Benchmarking Informatics Health Informatics Professional Development Board

Benchmarking Informatics Health Informatics Professional Development Board. Katherine Pigott (Course Administrator) Dr S de Lusignan, Ms A Rapley, Dr S Barman, Ms A Pritchard-Copley & Mr J Robinson Biomedical informatics BSc / MSci St George’s - University of London. Overview.

emma
Download Presentation

Benchmarking Informatics Health Informatics Professional Development Board

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Benchmarking InformaticsHealth Informatics Professional Development Board Katherine Pigott (Course Administrator) Dr S de Lusignan, Ms A Rapley, Dr S Barman, Ms A Pritchard-Copley & Mr J Robinson Biomedical informatics BSc / MSci St George’s - University of London

  2. Overview • Defining a benchmarking standard • Why benchmark learning outcomes for informatics? • Creating an undergraduate informatics course • BMI Course content and structure

  3. Overview (2) • Constructing the benchmark • The three levels of the benchmarking statement • Principal findings For the future • Future collaborative work • Useful web links

  4. Defining a benchmarking standard “1.The conceptual framework that gives a discipline its coherence and identity; 2. About the intellectual capability and understanding that should be developed, 3. The techniques and skills which are associated with developing an understanding in that discipline; and 4. The level of intellectual demand and challenge which is appropriate to that discipline.”

  5. Why benchmark learning outcomes for informatics? • Makes standards and core competencies explicit to students, HEIs + employers • Enables transnational education + employment • Has a pivotal role in Quality Assurance. • Will support future development of informatics courses.

  6. Rationale Increased role of IT in Healthcare Increased drive for system interoperability Tripartite course can pool expertise from three institutions Challenges in devising curriculum No QAA defined benchmarks for informatics Curriculum guidelines 5 to 6 years old Creating an undergraduate informatics course

  7. Course Structure of BSc/MSci Biomedical Informatics • BSc/MSci course • Four themes and 8 subjects • Eight 3-week modules a year, revisiting each of the 8 subjects in increasing complexity. • Students encouraged to take work placement between years 2 and 3. • Students can take 2 to 3 month placements between the years.

  8. Years 1-3 – first 4 subjects • Health, disease and treatment. • Technology at the point of care. • Clinical data & the computerised medical record. • Health services strategy and IS.

  9. Years 1-3 – second 4 subjects • Healthcare organisation • Evidence based medicine and knowledge management • Information governance • Genetics and bioinformatics

  10. Course Content - MSci • Research/project options • Medical Statistics • Evaluating Informatics tools • Specialist options (selection) • Programming • Electronic Commerce Technologies • Analysis and developing software

  11. Constructing the benchmarking statement (1) • Mapped 6 publications outlining academic & vocational scope of informatics • IMIA –International Medical Informatics Association • IT Eductra – Education and Training in health informatics • BCS-ES – BCS Health Informatics Forum Education Steps • NHS NOS – National Occupational Standards for Health Informatics • NHS IM&T – National Health Service Vocational awards in Information Management and Technology • Draft programme for BMI at SGUL.

  12. Constructing the benchmarking statement (2) • Bloom’s taxonomy • Creation of 20 web templates • Mapping learning objectives and vocational competencies to benchmarks

  13. Benchmarking StatementsLevel 1 The seven core learning outcomes include • Identify the need for IT applications in healthcare. • Demonstrate competence in the technologies and skills for learning and development. • Apply organisational techniques to interpret information. • Deploy skills required in management of patients and their records. • Describe health and social care information systems. • Define basic terminology and concepts of informatics and computer science and explain concepts in mathematics and biometry.

  14. Benchmarking StatementsLevel 2 The seven core learning outcomes include: • Discuss and apply advanced informatics and computer science. • Demonstrate use and design of software. • Analyse and assess different coding systems in healthcare. • Define and evaluate informatics standards. • Display an awareness of the fields of Medicine, health and biosciences, NHS and describe applications of biomedical informatics specialities. • Show appropriate customer service skills.

  15. Benchmarking StatementsLevel 3 The six core learning outcomes include: • Critically discuss ethical issues. • Manage, implement and assess ICT. • Identify and synthesise solutions for technical/security faults (risk assessment). • Present information regarding image and signal processing. • Plan, implement, monitor, evaluate and complete projects. • Exhibit managerial skills and knowledge.

  16. Principal Findings • Commonality across informatics academic objectives. • Current standards (i.e. IMIA) need updating. • Benchmarks offer increased transparency to HEIs, employers & enable transnational collaboration.

  17. Feedback from BCS HIF • Immediate feedback • Data standards should be explicit. • Benchmarking needs to be more than an academic exercise. • Reflect on nomenclature of course • Absence of further initiatives

  18. Course Developments • Cohort of 41 students on the course • Recruitment for 2007-8 cohort • Investigating student work placement opportunities • Embedding the course within the informatics profession

  19. Plans for the future • Validation of benchmarks • Map UKCHIP competencies • Examine limitations of mapping to a single place in the learning hierarchy. • Call for further research and collaboration

  20. Useful web links • Information about our course: http://www.sgul.ac.uk/ • Benchmarking statement on the web: http://www.gpinformatics.org/benchmark2006/ Further reading: Pritchard-Copley, A., de Lusignan, S., Rapley, A., Robinson, J.,Towards a benchmarking statement for Biomedical Informatics. Healthcare Computing. 2006: 221-229.

  21. Any questions? Contact: kpigott@sgul.ac.uk 020 8725 5661

More Related