1 / 18

FHC NH Partnership for Patients

FHC NH Partnership for Patients. Our charge is clear: reduce preventable harm by 40% and reduce preventable readmissions by 20% by 2013. Partnership for Patients. Launched in April 2011 Initiative from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Innovation Center

emmanuel-garrett
Download Presentation

FHC NH Partnership for Patients

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FHC NH Partnership for Patients Our charge is clear: reduce preventable harm by 40% and reduce preventable readmissions by 20% by 2013.

  2. Partnership for Patients • Launched in April 2011 • Initiative from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Innovation Center • Established by the Affordable Care Act to identify and develop promising new models of care delivery to reduce costs and increase quality. • $500 million funding

  3. Keep patients from getting injured or sicker. • By the end of 2013, preventable hospital-acquired conditions would decrease by 40 percent compared to 2010.  • Achieving this goal would mean approximately 1.8 million fewer injuries to patients, with more than 60,000 lives saved over the next three years.

  4. Help patients heal without complication. • By the end of 2013, preventable complications during a transition from one care setting to another would be decreased so that hospital readmissions would be reduced by 20 percent compared to 2010.  • Achieving this goal would mean more than 1.6 million patients will recover from illness without suffering a preventable complication requiring re-hospitalization within 30 days of discharge. 

  5. Hospital Engagement Networks • 26 State, regional and national hospital system organizations • help identify solutions already working to reduce healthcare acquired conditions • work to spread them to other hospitals and health care providers • develop learning collaboratives for hospitals • rapidly improve patient safety in hospitals • Two “HENs” in NH • NH FHC Partnership for Patients • Intermountain Healthcare

  6. NH Hospitals:100% Engagement

  7. Partnership for Patients: Core Areas of Focus • Adverse drug events (ADE) • Central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSI) • Pressure ulcers • Surgical site infections • Injuries from falls and immobility • Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) • Obstetrical adverse events • Venous thromboembolism (VTE) • Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) • Preventable readmissions

  8. Building upon platform ofNH Partnership to ELIMINATE HARM by 2015

  9. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) • 1st Focus as part of NH Eliminate Harm by 2015 • “VTE Prevention-Live Clot Free” in NH toolkit distributed July 2011 to all hospitals • Data collection began Q4 2011: VTE prophylaxis and DVT/PE Incidence • Varying degrees of implementation, some driven by Meaningful Use & SCIP

  10. Live Clot Free in New Hampshire • Toolkit sent to all hospitals in July • Measurement definitions • Reporting forms • Sample protocols • VTE discharge education sheet • FAQ

  11. Summary of VTE Data • Audit period: October 1 – December 31,2011 discharges • 22 Hospitals submitted VTE Data • Range of Eligible Patients audited per hospital was from 5 – 3230 patients • 1 less than 30 • 14 Hospitals provided requested sample size of 30 • 7 more than 30

  12. Hospitals Reporting VTE Data

  13. % of eligible patients who received VTE prophylaxis or have documentation why no VTE prophylaxis was given

  14. # of Hospitals with patients with confirmed VTE out of Twenty Two Hospitals who submitted data

  15. Summary of # of Patients with confirmed VTE and # of those Patients who received no VTE prophylaxis HARM

  16. Questions for Discussion • In Search of Data Collection Methods • What are the barriers / challenges? • Lessons learned? • In Search of Better Processes • What did you learn as you were doing reviews? • Did you develop tools to enhance VTE prophylaxis? • Did you identify any templates of best practices?

  17. FHC NH Partnership for Patients2013 VISION “Live Free of Medical Error, and Don’t Die!”

More Related