1 / 20

In the name of GOD

In the name of GOD. Adrenal Imaging. Adrenocortical adenoma is the most common adrenal tumor. This lesion is frequently encountered on cross-sectional imaging that has been performed for unrelated reasons.

enelsen
Download Presentation

In the name of GOD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. In the name ofGOD

  2. Adrenal Imaging

  3. Adrenocortical adenoma is the most common adrenal tumor. This lesion is frequently encountered on cross-sectional imaging that has been performed for unrelated reasons.

  4. Because the majority of adenomas are non-functioning, most of these lesions are detected incidentally on routine imaging that has been performed for unrelated reasons

  5. The prevalence of adrenal adenoma is reported to be related to age; the frequency of unsuspected adenoma is 0.14% in patients aged 20–29 years and 7% in those older than 70 years

  6. Although CT does not allow functioning adenomas to be differentiated from non-functioning adenomas, the presence of ipsilateral or contralateral adrenocortical atrophy is strongly suggestive of a functioning adenoma that has resulted in Cushing’s syndrome

  7. Because almost all adenomas can be characterized using imaging alone, the number of adrenal mass biopsies has been reduced dramatically.

  8. For cases with imaging features that are suggestive of adrenal adenoma, the lesion is simply followed with cross-sectional imaging to determine if there has been any change in size

  9. However, recent investigations have revealed that the true accuracy of imaging modalities for adenoma characterization is lower than has been reported previously because of many false-positive and false-negative lesions

  10. Unenhanced CT Unenhanced CT is a useful imaging modality for characterizing lipid-rich adenomas which measure 10 HU or less The sensitivity and specificity for adenoma characterization are 71% and 98%, respectively

  11. Analyses of the UCT histogram can provide a higher sensitivity than lesion attenuation measurement on UCT Several investigations have shown that a threshold of >10% negative pixel presence achieves 84–91% sensitivity and 100% specificity for adenoma characterization

  12. MRI Chemical-shift imaging (CSI) is an excellent MRI sequence for characterizing adenomas with abundant intracytoplasmic lipid Many adenomas are hyperintense on in-phase imaging and hypointense on oppose-phase imaging. CSI is superior to UCT for adenoma characterization. Reportedly, the use of CSI with a threshold of 20% for the signal intensity index (SII) results in a higher sensitivity than is provided by a CT histogram analysis

  13. lipid-poor adenoma

  14. The adrenal-to-spleen ratio (ASR) and SII are commonly used as quantitative MR parameters. SII is more accurate than ASR for adenoma characterization. DWI is not useful for differentiating adenoma and non-adenoma MR spectroscopy (MRS) reportedly has the potential to differentiate adenoma from non-adenoma based on the analysis of the choline-to-creatinine ratio

  15. Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCI) is a useful modality for differentiating adenoma from malignant lesions Most adenomas show early homogeneous enhancement on the arterial phase and early washout on the venous phase In contrast, most malignant lesions show poor enhancement on the arterial phase and heterogeneous or peripheral enhancement on the venous phase

  16. Therefore, two-phase (early and delayed) contrast-enhanced CT scans are required to characterize an adenoma which measures >10 HU on UCT Early contrast-enhanced CT (ECT) scanning is performed 60 s after the administration of the contrast material, and delayed contrast-enhanced CT (DCT) scanning is performed 10 min or 15 min

  17. APW = [ECT (HU) − DCT (HU)] × 100/[ECT (HU) − UCT (HU)]. RPW = [ECT (HU) − DCT (HU)]  × 100/ECT (HU) The thresholds of APW and RPW for an adenoma are 60% and 40%, respectively, for 15-min DCTand 50% and 40% for 10-min DCT, respectively RPW is more accurate than APW, and 15-min DCT is more accurate than 10-min DCT for diagnosing an adrenal adenoma

  18. Almost all adenomas show peak enhancement around 1 min after the injection of the contrast material. If the peak enhancement occurs prior to or after 1 min, the lesion is likely to be diagnosed as a non-adenoma because of decreases in APW and RPW

  19. Thankyou

More Related