1 / 23

Adaptive Lattice Filters for CDMA Overlay

Adaptive Lattice Filters for CDMA Overlay. DSP 2 Project Presentation By Rajat Kapur & AdityaKiran Jagannatham. CDMA Technology. CDMA is a Multiple Access wireless technique. Uses the idea of Spread Spectrum Benefits of CDMA:

enrique
Download Presentation

Adaptive Lattice Filters for CDMA Overlay

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Adaptive Lattice Filtersfor CDMA Overlay DSP 2 Project Presentation By Rajat Kapur & AdityaKiran Jagannatham

  2. CDMA Technology • CDMA is a Multiple Access wireless technique. • Uses the idea of Spread Spectrum • Benefits of CDMA: 1.Capacity increases of 8 to 10 times that of an AMPS analog system 2. Improved call quality, 3.Simplified system planning through frequency reuse. 4.Enhanced privacy and Bandwidth on demand 5. Possibility of fewer cell sites

  3. The Overlay Concept: • Motivation: Increasing demand for BW in Mobile Comm. • Establishment of PCN in the 1.85-1.99 GHz Band (‘92) • Previously occupied by Narrow-band Microwave Signals • This situation of “Spectrum Sharing” CDMA Overlay. • Initial experiments in Houston, Orlando, San Diego using Broad-Band CDMA • Goals: 1. Overlay would not excessively interfere with N-Band 2. PCN users can operate efficiently in the overlay environment 3. Conform to PCN philosophy (100W in 183m cell radius)

  4. Adaptive Filtering in CDMA Overlay • LMS Filtering employed in N-Band interference rejection (’96) • Lattice Filtering suggested as an alternative by J.Wang and V.Prahatheesan (2K) • Lattice shown to outperform LMS

  5. Overlay Receiver CDMA Receiver Nband Filter Channel Hard Decision Lattice Filter BP Filter

  6. P represents Signal Power • f0 is the CDMA Carrier Frequency • bk – kth user binary information • N = Tb/Tc Processing Gain • k = Rayleigh Fading Parameter ( E(k2) = 2 ) • k – Random Phase ~ [0,2] • k – Path Delay ~ [0, Tb ] (Rayleigh Flat Fading Channel) • Bc = 2/Tc - CDMA Signal Bandwidth • j(t) = Narrow-Band Interference Signal • n(t) = Band-Limited AWGN (PSD ~ N0/2)

  7. jc(t), js(t) – Inphase and Quadrature Narrow-Band Components •  = frequency offset from CDMA Carrier • p = Bj/Bc • q = Tc

  8. Lattice Filter Structure

  9. Lattice Recursive Equation • Cleaned CDMA Signal ….which is the final stage lattice output

  10. Analysis • Almost EXACT analysis !!! • Reflection Coefficient Update Equation is given as: • Ta - Update Interval • Ta 2/Bj, 2/Bj ~ Input Correlation Time •  - Step Size • Signal Sampled @ Tc (Chip Time) • Input Signal independent at update intervals • No need to ASSUME Independence! • Central Limit Principle applied

  11. Analysis Cont’d… • Input at sample time intervals is given as: • Correlation of input samples: • It can be derived…. • Observation: Correlation at Tc , 2Tc exclusively from N-Band Signal • Tc  Correlation Time of CDMA Signal • Hence is analogous to “White Noise”

  12. Analysis Cont’d… • Reflection Coefficient at jth iteration… • The Product term indicates dependence on past data • For a large number of co-channel users ( K ~ 30 or >) , the term… • Can be simplified as… …using CLP • To yield…

  13. Analysis Cont’d… • Which in the limit yields… • …clearly showing E[R1] depends on step size  !!! • Observe: If  = 0 … • … the optimal Wiener Filter Coefficient • Similarly, it can shown that

  14. Analysis Cont’d… • Where A is given by… … pretty complicated !!!

  15. Analysis Cont’d… • SNR Calculation: The Despreader O/P is given as… • bi() - th bit of ithuser • J – NBand interference, N – Interference from Noise • I – Co-Channel User Interference

  16. Analysis Cont’d… • where • this FINALLY concludes our analysis !!! • †Precise Details can be found in references…

  17. Simulations: • System Specs. : • K = 30 (No. of Co-Channel Users),  = 0.1 (-7 dB Fading) • p = Bj/Bc = 5% (0.05)  Ta = 20 Tc • q = Tc = 0 (=0) • N = Tb/Tc Processing Gain = 750 • J/S = 17,20,23 dB • b – 32 Kbps, BPSK Signal • Link Specs. : • f0 : 1.884 GHz (B-M), 1.956 GHz (M-B) • Chip Rate = 24 Mchips/sec  Tc = 1/24E6 • 48 MHz BW for each DS Waveform • N-Band Interference - 64 QAM @ 45 Mbps • †Specs. taken from “On the Feasibility of a CDMA Overlay for PCN (’92)

  18. Simulation Results: Convergence behavior of R1…

  19. Results Cont’d: Convergence behavior of R1…

  20. Results Cont’d: LMS Vs Lattice SNR Performance… †From: Adaptive Lattice Filters for CDMA Overlay (Trans. Comm., 2K)

  21. Sim. Log.: • Simulations done in Base-Band • Iterations of the order 750 X 30 X 30 + 750 X 30 X 40 • Random Binary Sequences used as PN Sequences •  = 1 for user  no attenuation on Direct Path • White Noise used

  22. Conclusions… • CDMA Overlay effective for frequency re-use • Each stage of the Lattice Converges independent of others • Lattice Filter provides faster rate of convergence compared to LMS Filter • Lattice Filter has good capability of Narrow Band • Interference Suppression References… • “Adaptive Lattice Filters for CDMA Overlay”- Trans. Comm., 2K • “Adaptive LMS Filters for Cellular CDMA Overlay”- Select Areas in Comm., ‘96 • “On the Feasibility of CDMA Overlay for PCN”- Select Areas in Comm.,’92 • “Cellular CDMA Overlay Systems”- IEE Proc. Comm., ‘96

More Related