1 / 26

EHP’s and the RPTS

EHP’s and the RPTS. Mel Cairns MCIEH, Health &Housing Consultant Professional Member of the London RPTS Panel. What is the RPTS?. Residential Property Tribunal Service Sponsored by DCLG Part of the judiciary Independent expert tribunal 3 types of tribunal – RAC LVT RPT.

ericwomack
Download Presentation

EHP’s and the RPTS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EHP’s and the RPTS • Mel Cairns MCIEH, Health &Housing Consultant • Professional Member of the London RPTS Panel

  2. What is the RPTS? • Residential Property Tribunal Service • Sponsored by DCLG • Part of the judiciary • Independent expert tribunal • 3 types of tribunal – RAC LVT RPT

  3. How is it set up? • 5 regional Panels • Case Officer handles each application • RPT consists of two or three members, usually a lawyer, a valuer and a lay/professional member.

  4. Procedure • Schedule 13 (Housing Act 2004) and The Residential Property Tribunal Procedure (England) Regulations 2006 • 49 new jurisdictions covering quality and use of housing stock and licensing of certain types of accommodation. • Over-riding objective is to deal fairly and justly with applications

  5. Initial Processing of Applications • Check – jurisdiction time limits completeness • Notify Respondent • Directions issued

  6. Powers of an RPT • S.230(2) General power to give such directions as are necessary or desirable for securing the just, expeditious and economical disposal of the proceedings or any issue raised in connection with them.

  7. Procedure to hearing • Hearing details - 15 week target from date of application - usually 6-8 weeks in practice - oral hearing or paper determination • Decision - drafted and agreed by RPT - issued within 2-4 weeks • Urgent cases

  8. Directions • Usually specify – - Dates for submission of statements and documents - Types of documents to be provided - Expert witness requirements - Preparation of bundle. • Compliance is essential

  9. The Inspection • RPT may inspect the premises, any other premises which will assist and/or the locality. • Subject to any necessary consent. • Parties may usually be present. • Evidence not usually heard at the inspection.

  10. The Hearing (1) • Appeals are “by way of re-hearing” • Primary duty to assess suitability on day of hearing. • RPT can take into account matters of which the housing authority was not aware. • In public, unless RPT decides should be in private

  11. The Hearing (2) • Informal but structured • Procedure decided by RPT • Usually similar to civil court, eg evidence and cross examination with closing statements • Parties may be represented by lawyer, surveyor or other advocate but often are not

  12. The Hearing (3) • Expert witness – prior written statement • Documents – prior disclosure • Postponement only in certain circumstances.

  13. The Decision • Must be in writing • Sent to all parties • May be given verbally in the first instance • May reserve decision on costs

  14. Costs • Re-imbursement of fee - Regulation 6 ofThe Residential Property Tribunal (Fees)(England) Regulations 2006. • Re-imbursement of costs in certain circumstances – Housing Act, Schedule 13, para.12– maximum £500.

  15. After the decision • Decision cannot be revisited • Right of appeal to Lands Tribunal • Must seek leave to appeal from RPT • If refused, can seek leave from LT • Time limits • Decisions are published on our web site and passed to LACORS.

  16. Assistance • Guidance booklet available • IF IN DOUBT – ASK! We cannot give advice on the law or how to conduct your case but we are always willing to explain our procedures and process. On consumer satisfaction surveys, our staff consistently score highly on approachability and helpfulness. • We welcome constructive feedback

  17. Points for Practice Avoid appeals by : • Good/thorough inspections(inc photos) b) Demonstrating that options have been considered and explaining reasons for the choices made.( full statement of reasons) c) Consistent with concordat and professional guidance.

  18. Before the Hearing • Comply with directions/time limits • Checklist/tick boxes • Prepare good bundle: -Scott-schedule - Pagination - Dividers

  19. At the hearing - Stay calm – less formal than Court! -Make list of points you want to cover -Be familiar with bundle -Proceed through chronology/Scott Schd

  20. Contact • Regional Panels in London,Midlands, Northern, Southern and Eastern. • www.RPTS.gov.uk • Helpline -0845 600 3178

  21. Emergency Actions • Luton Borough Council –v- Universal Group HA/6/2007 • Munir –v-LB of Wandsworth LON/OOBJ/HER2009/0002

  22. POWERS OF ENTRY • (1) Evans -v- London Borough of Camden LON/00AG/HIN/2007/0009 • (2) John -v- Cardiff City Council RPT/HA04/HMO/1 • (3) Weinberg -v- Rhondda Cynon Taf County Borough Council RPT/HA04/S11/IMP7 • (4) Williams -v- Monmouthshire County Council RPT/HA04/S11/IMP8 • (5) Martin Thomas -v- Bristol County Council • (6) St. John The Baptist College, Oxford -v- Vale of White Horse District Council • (7) Cheltenham Construction Ltd. -v- Gloucester County Council • (8) Angela Clayton -v- Torbay Council • (9) Mosser-v-Cornwall Council CH1/15LB/HIN/2009/0009

  23. Improvement Notices • Weingreen Ltd. -v- Lichfield District Council BIR/41UD/HIN/2009/2005 • McGarraghy -v- Rugby Borough Council BIR/44UD/HIN/2006/0003 • Hanley -v- High Peak Borough Council BIR/1704/HIN/2009/0007 • Law -v- London Borough of Islington LON/00AU/HIN/2007/0015

  24. Prohibition Orders • Hanley -v- Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council MAN/00BT/HIN/2009/0005 • Healy -v- St. Albans City & District Council CAM/26UG/HPO/2006/0002

More Related