160 likes | 306 Views
Ischemic Conditioning and Endothelial Function Todd Anderson Libin Cardiovascular Institute University of Calgary. Disclosures. Department of Cardiac Sciences and Libin Cardiovascular Institute – U of Calgary Grant support by Alberta Innovates Merck, Amgen, Abbott. BASELINE (3.65 mm).
E N D
Ischemic Conditioning and Endothelial Function Todd Anderson Libin Cardiovascular Institute University of Calgary
Disclosures • Department of Cardiac Sciences and Libin Cardiovascular Institute – U of Calgary • Grant support by Alberta Innovates • Merck, Amgen, Abbott
BASELINE (3.65 mm) REACTIVE HYPEREMIA (4.08 mm) Flow-Mediated Vasodilation FMD = 10.5 %
Microvasculature Philpott et al. ATVB 2007;27:2065
Ischemic Conditioning • Ischemia-reperfusion injury • Kloner JCI 1974:54:1496 – No reflow in dogs • Reimer et al. Circulation 1977; 56:786 – wavefront of ischemic death • Braunwald and Kloner. JCI 1985;76:1713 – double edged sword and concept of stunned myocardium Circulation 1982 • Ischemic conditioning • Murry et al. Circulation 1986; 74:1174 – IPC
Ischemic Conditioning Significant parallelism between pre and post-conditioning Vinten-Johansen JAP 2007;103:1441
Ischemic Conditioning and Endothelial Function • Ischemia-reperfusion injury causes injury and acute conduit and NO dependent micro-vessel endothelial dysfunction • Pre and post-conditioning with IPC bouts of transient ischemia attenuate this abnormality • Pharmacological conditioning prevents IR endothelial dysfunction acutely but less reliably chronically • IPC improves LV function during acute myocardial infarction in some but not all studies • Remote IPC also results in variable outcomes • IPC may also have favorable effects on other outcomes including blood pressure
Ischemic Conditioning Kharbanda Circ 2001; 103:1624
Ischemic Conditioning Attenuation of NO dependent increases in FBF post IR injury with activation of neutrophils as well Attenuation of FMD with pre-conditioning attenuating this abnormality Kharbanda Circ 2001; 103:1624
Remote Ischemic Conditioning 20 minutes of ischemia with and without 3 cycles of 5 minutes of IPC on the contra-lateral arm Kharbanda Circ 2002; 106:2881
Remote Ischemic Post-Conditioning 19 healthy subjects RIPC and RPostC 20 minutes of ischemia With and without glibenclamide to assess K+ ATP channels Both prevented the ↓ FMD with IR (PostC in leg but not arm) and this was blocked by glibenclamide Loukogeorgakis et al. Circulation 2007;116:1386
Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury 45 normal subjects with 15 minutes of ischemia Attenuation of FMD but no change in hyperemic stimulus or PAT-index IR doesn’t impair microvascular function Alhejily et al. Microcirculation 2013
Pharmacologic Conditioning - Statins Liuni et al. Clin Hemorheol 2010;45:161
Ischemic Conditioning 30 healthy subjects IR alone vs 1 day IPC vs 7 d IPC protocol 3 cycles of 5 min of ischemia and reperfusion Celecoxib did not change results. Both 1 and 7 days of IPC attenuated IR decrease in FMD Luca et al. JAHA 2013;2(1)
Ischemic Conditioning 30 healthy subjects IR alone vs 1 day IPC vs 7 d IPC protocol 3 cycles of 5 min of ischemia and reperfusion Celecoxib did not change results. Both 1 and 7 days of IPC attenuated IR decrease in FMD Luca et al. JAHA 2013;2(1)
Ischemic Conditioning and Endothelial Function • Effect of acute or repeated episodes of IPC in patients with endothelial dysfunction is unknown • Acute and 7 days of IPC can ameliorate the IR-induced decreases in FMD with no effect on measures of microvascular response (hyperemic velocity or PAT) • Pre-conditioning may be more effective than post-conditioning in the forearm acute endothelial dysfunction model (and studies are mixed with AMI) • Further studies are needed to assess the effects of longer term IPC on endothelial function and cardiovascular pathophysiology