110 likes | 149 Views
Dept of Phys. M.C. Chang. Optical processes and excitons. Dielectric function and reflectance Kramers-Kronig relations Excitons Frenkel exciton Mott-Wannier exciton Raman spectroscopy. Dielectric function, reflectivity r, and reflectance R
E N D
Dept of Phys M.C. Chang Optical processes and excitons • Dielectric functionand reflectance • Kramers-Kronig relations • Excitons • Frenkel exciton • Mott-Wannier exciton • Raman spectroscopy
Dielectric function, reflectivity r, and reflectance R Response of a crystal to an EM field is characterized by (k,), (k0 compared to G/2) Experimentalists prefer to measure reflectivity r (normal incidence) Prob.3 It is easier to measure R than to measure measure R() for () (with the help of KK relations) n() ()
Kramers-Kronig relations (1926) KK relation connects real part of the response function with the imaginary part examples of response function: • does not depend on any dynamic detail of the interaction • the necessary and sufficient condition for its validity is causality Ohm’s law polarization reflective EM wave Example: Response of charged (independent) oscillators For the j-th oscillator (atom or molecule with Z bound charges), steady state electric dipole
Some properties of (): (1) () has no pole above (including) x-axis. (2) along (upper) infinite semi-circle (3) ’() is even in , ’’() is odd in . Collection of oscillators for identical oscillators Figs from http://www.physics.uc.edu/~sitko/LightColor/10-Optics1/optics1.htm
ω and many more…, e.g., (4)+(5) (next page): By Ferrel and Glover (1958) From (1), (2), we have ( can be , or , or... ) property (3) used Also, A few sum rules: An example of the “fluctuation-dissipation” relation From (1) and (2), >>1 (Prob. 2): Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn sum rule From (3), >>1 (Prob. 4):
KK relation for reflection Why take log? See Yu and Cardona for related discussion • constant R(s) doesn’t contribute • s>>, s<< don’t contribute ref: Cardona and Yu
Conductivity of free electron gas (j=0, with little damping) (KK relations can be checked easily in this case) Recall that (chap 10) Real part of DC conductivity diverges (compare with ne2/m) Drude weight D Other sum rules (Mahan, p358): Related to the energy loss of a passing charged particle
Dielectric function and the semiconductor energy gap (prob.5) band gap absorption (due to nonzero ’’) can be very roughly approximated by Si Ge GaAs InP GaP ’ 12.0 16.0 10.9 9.6 9.1 Eg (theo) 4.8 4.3 5.2 5.2 5.75 Ex (exp’t) 4.44 4.49 5.11 5.05 5.21 (ref: Cardona and Yu) Figs from Ibach and Luth
Interband absorption for GaAs at 21 K Excitons (e-h pairs) in insulators • Tight bound Frenkel exciton: • (excited state of a single atom) • alkali halide crystals • crystalline inert gases
Weakly bound Mott-Wannier excitons Similar to the impurity states in doped semiconductor: CuO2
1930 Raman effect in crystals