1 / 19

Management of the infants at increased risk for early onset sepsis from group B streptococcal infection

Management of the infants at increased risk for early onset sepsis from group B streptococcal infection. Martin Skidmore University of Toronto. Group B Streptococcus (GBS). Most GBS early onset sepsis (EOS) caused by types Ia, Ib, II, III & V

ernie
Download Presentation

Management of the infants at increased risk for early onset sepsis from group B streptococcal infection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Management of the infants at increased risk for early onset sepsis from group B streptococcal infection Martin Skidmore University of Toronto

  2. Group B Streptococcus (GBS) • Most GBS early onset sepsis (EOS) caused by types Ia, Ib, II, III & V • Type III more commonly associated with late onset sepsis/meningitis • 20-30% of American women are colonised (may be as high as 60%) • 50% of infants born to colonised mothers become, themselves, colonised • 1-2% of colonised infants will develop invasive GBS

  3. GBS bacteriuria at anytime during the pregnancy • Previous child with invasive GBS disease

  4. BACKGROUND • 1996: consensus guidelines from The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) to women at risk for delivering an infant with EOS, GBS infection • 2002: CDC conducted a large, retrospective cohort study which demonstrated positive impact and issued universal screening guidelines

  5. Impact Incidence of EOS from GBS • 1993: 1.7 cases/1000 live births • 2003-5: 0.34 cases/1000 live births • a reduction of 80% • Incidence of EOS from non GBS unchanged

  6. Recommendations • Screen ALL mothers with rectovaginal cultures at 35-37 weeks for GBS • Treat those with positive cultures with penicillin in labour

  7. “Cost” • As many as 22% of all mothers will receive IAP to prevent disease in 0.2 % of infants and prevent mortality in 0.01% of infants

  8. Strategies (A) • Well-appearing infant of GBS positive mother, who received IAP more than 4 hours prior to delivery • N/B requires no therapy • ± stay in hospital ≥ 24 hours • Insufficient evidence regarding efficacy of alternative antibiotics – treat as “incomplete IAP”

  9. Strategies (B) Well-appearing infant of GBS positive mother, who received IAP less than 4 hours prior to delivery (or not at all) • Risk approximately 1% • ¼ are asymptomatic • Is empiric treatment therefore justified? • 95% who develop EOS will present with clinical signs < 24 hours • 4% between 24 and 48 hours • 1% > 48 hours • Therefore: to detect each case of EOS 2000 infants would require 48 hours hospitalization • Therefore: case for careful assessment and discharge at 24 hours

  10. Use of the CBC • Positive predictive value is low in the newborn • One study: “abnormal CBC”: • WBC 5.0 x109/L or lower • WBC 30 x109/L or greater • Immature/mature ratio > 0.2 • 1665 well appearing term infants at risk for EOS • PPV of 1.5% of abnormal CBC in identifying the development of “clinical sepsis” • None developed positive blood culture • Ottolini et al; 2003

  11. Use of the CBC cont. • Various scoring systems for analyzing CBCs • best individual finding with highest PPV is a low total WBC (5.0 x109/L) • LR between 10 and 20 • ? justifies treatment even if “well appearing” infants • (only 22%-44% of infants with sepsis will have such a low WBC) • Fowlie, Schmidt; 1998

  12. Strategies (C) Well appearing infant of a GBS-negative mother with risk factors at delivery eg. • ROM ≥ 18 hours • Pyrexia ≥38°C • premature labour at < 36 weeks • GBS bacteriuria • Previous child with invasive GBS disease • Present in 22% and only identified 50% who eventually developed invasive GBS disease • Schrag et al, 2002 • Towers et al, 1999 • “Limited evaluation”: CBC & 24 hours of observation

  13. Strategies (D) Well appearing infant of mother with unknown GBS status • Managed as per ‘risk factors’: • Absence of risk factors – no intervention required • Risk factors present • IAP > 4 hours: routine care • IAP < 4 hours: limited evaluation (applies to late preterm infant as GBS screening results may not be available)

  14. Chorioamnionitis • ‘pyrexia’ may occur with epidural and/or dehydration • ‘possible’ chorioamnionitis • fever only • ‘definite’ chorioamnionitis • fever • ‘left shift’ in mat CBC • lower uterine tenderness

  15. Chorioamnionitis • Chorioamnionitis but infant well at birth • OR for sepsis 0.26 (95% C1 0.11to 0.63) • Invasive infection < 2% • Jackson et al, 2004 • Therefore limited evaluation only? • requirement for resuscitation at birth • otherwise, treat only if CBC is suggestive of infection (ie low WBC)

  16. How should an infant be monitored, investigated and treated given the: • Presence of clinical signs of sepsis • GBS culture status of the mother • Treatment status of the mother • Presence / absence of maternal risk factors for neonatal sepsis?

More Related