1 / 55

Derek Raine & Cheryl Hurkett, University of Leicester

LeAP Summer Workshop Promoting PBL. Derek Raine & Cheryl Hurkett, University of Leicester Natalie Rowley, University of Birmingham. Problem 1. The problem is presented to you in the form of a comic strip (or graphic novel). Instructions:. Read the comic strip

erol
Download Presentation

Derek Raine & Cheryl Hurkett, University of Leicester

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LeAP Summer WorkshopPromoting PBL Derek Raine & Cheryl Hurkett, University of Leicester • Natalie Rowley, University of Birmingham

  2. Problem 1 • The problem is presented to you in the form of a comic strip (or graphic novel)

  3. Instructions: • Read the comic strip • Individually write down a sentence describing your initial understanding of the problem • Locate the problem as a group • Exchange your Existing Knowledge in relation to the problem; attempt the problem • Identify Issues for further research

  4. Report back – group presentations • What is the problem? • What are the issues? • What more research do you need to carry out?

  5. What did we do? • Why ask for individual reflection? • Why agree the problem? • Why list existing knowledge? • Why list issues? The concept of learning issues is central to PBL. It encourages students to think for themselves about what they know and what they don’t know about an issue.

  6. How did we do?

  7. What are the issues for PBL? Problem 2: How do we promote PBL?

  8. Problem 2: Our Learning Issues • What is PBL? • What are we trying to achieve? • Planning • Problem writing • Facilitation • Group formation • Assessment • Evaluation; student engagement • Promoting PBL

  9. What is PBL?

  10. Definitions: PBL PBL (problem-based learning) is a student-centred method of teaching in which students learn by investigating real-world problems and, working in groups, seek out the tools necessary to solve them.

  11. What is the difference? • Problem-based learning • Enquiry-based learning • Case-based learning • Project-based learning • Research-based learning

  12. Variations: EBL • Definition: Centre for Excellence in Enquiry-Based Learning, University of Manchester • “EBL describes an environment in which learning is driven by a process of enquiry owned by the student. Starting with a “scenario” and with the guidance of a facilitator, students identify their own issues and questions. They then examine the resources they need to research the topic, thereby acquiring the requisite knowledge. Knowledge so gained is more readily retained because it has been acquired by experience and relation to a real problem.” • EBL includes the following activities: • Problem based learning • Small scale investigations • Projects and research

  13. Variations: Self-Directed Learning • Definition: McMaster University, Ontario, Canada (1/2) “Inquiry is a form of Self-Directed Learning and follows the four basic stages defining self-directed learning. Students take more responsibility for: • Determining what they need to learn • Identifying resources and how best to learn from them • Using resources and reporting their learning • Assessing their progress in learning”

  14. Variations: Self-Directed Learning • Definition: McMaster University, Ontario, Canada (2/2) “Teaching through “inquiry” involves engaging students in the research process with instructor support and coaching at a level appropriate to their starting skills. Students learn discipline specific content but in doing so, engage and refine their inquiry skills. An inquiry course: • Is question driven, rather than topic or thesis driven • Begins with a general theme to act as a starting point or trigger for learning • Emphasizes asking good researchable questions on the theme, and coaches students in doing this • Builds library, interview, and web search skills, along with the critical thinking skills necessary for thoughtful review of the information. Coaches students on how to best report their learning in oral or written form • Provides some mechanism (interviews, drafts, minutes of groups meetings, benchmark activities, etc) to help students monitor their progress within the course. • Draws on the expertise and knowledge of the instructor to model effective inquiry and to promote reflection.”

  15. What are we trying to achieve?

  16. Co-operative learning The average normalized gains <g> for problem-based honours courses at the University of Delaware in 1994, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999 were between 0.45 and 0.64.  Those <g>'s may be compared with the average 0.48 +/-0.14 of <g>'s for forty-eight "interactive engagement" courses in a survey of mechanics test data for six thousand students in introductory physics courses [Hake (1998a)] • ‘nobody wants to like it, but it actually does work’ • it ‘almost felt like you were doing research’ • ‘Absolutely love it…’

  17. Engagement • Engagement • Students work together • Students choose which areas to explore, and which questions to answer • Students are active in the learning process • Focus • Away from the tutor – facilitator role • Towards the subject • Towards the learning process • Alignment…

  18. Alignment

  19. Planning

  20. Planning Who is it for? • Students (number and level) What are the objectives? • Process • Content What is the course? • Sequencing of course/problems • Time/structure of class

  21. Planning Who is the problem writer? • Discipline • Control issues • Level of investment How assessed? • Presentation, report, group/individual…? How evaluated?

  22. PBL Problem Writing

  23. Good PBL Problems… • Relate to real world, motivate students • Require decision-making or judgments • Are multi-page, multi-stage • Are designed for group-solving • Pose open-ended initial questions that encourage discussion • Incorporate course content objectives, higher order thinking

  24. Key features of “driving questions" Feasibility • Students can plan a way to investigate the question • The question is appropriate for the students Worth • The question is relevant to what people (including scholars in the discipline) really do • The question helps students to link major concepts • The question is complex enough to be broken down into smaller questions • The question leads to further questions (Modified from Krajcik, Czerniak, & Berger, Teaching Science in Elementary and Middle School Classrooms)

  25. Key features of “driving questions" Contextualization • The question is anchored in real world issues and has real world consequences. Meaning • The question is interesting and important to learners. • The question intersects with learners’ lives, reality, and culture. Sustainability • The question allows students to pursue solutions over time • Students can pursue answers to the question in great detail.

  26. Types of Learning Objectives Content-oriented: subject specific • Basic knowledge and understanding of specific concepts, techniques, etc. in the discipline Process-oriented: global skills • Effective communication: oral and written • Acquiring and evaluating information • Working effectively with others • Higher order, critical thinking

  27. Sources of Problems 1) Your current exercises 2) External sources • Newspaper articles, news events • Popular press in the discipline • Make up a story – based on content objectives • Adapt a case to a problem • Research papers • Other?

  28. Step One: Identify the course You can think of the subject, level of students, size of class, how you would use it. List the learning objectives that would be met by this problem

  29. Step Two: Think of a scenario Sketch out the first section

  30. Step Three: What comes next? Write a brief synopsis of the problem, emphasizing its possible staging Be prepared to report out.

  31. Facilitation

  32. What makes a good facilitator?

  33. Community Building 1) Interactions within groups 2) Interaction with facilitators and staff 3) Balance between group and individual work 4) Interaction between groups

  34. Interactions within groups • Group Roles/Rules • Group Action Plan • Peer Tutoring • Induction • Planning Phase • Investigation Phase • Analysis Phase • Assessment

  35. Interactions with facilitators and staff • Induction • Planning Phase • Investigation Phase • Analysis Phase • Assessment • Facilitator • Subject Expert • Audience

  36. Group and individual work • G & I Learning Outcomes • Individual • G & I Deliverables • Induction • Planning Phase • Investigation Phase • Analysis Phase • Assessment

  37. Interaction between groups • Induction • Planning Phase • Investigation Phase • Analysis Phase • Assessment • Assessment Design

  38. Group Formation

  39. Group Formation • Assigned or free-formed? • Random or structured? • Rotation rate?

  40. Authentic Assessment

  41. What is assessment for? Restricted access (selection/winner takes all) Competence or mastery of content Competence or mastery of process Potential (The Apprentice) Group process Group process

  42. Assessment types • Expert witness • Pitch • Podcast • Poster • Report to …. • Conference presentation

  43. Authentic Assessment Water pipes in the desert There is too much data or too many experiments for each group to carry out the whole project alone. Telescope project Presentations and reports are required to exchange information.

  44. Problems of Group Assessment • Pitfalls: • Over-assessment • Staff time • Free-loaders • Identifying contributions • Solution: • Group work as culture (co-operative learning) not method Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-Based Practices, Smith et al J EngEduc Jan 2005

More Related