1 / 18

Understanding the Role of the Built Environment in Safety and Quality Improvem ent

Understanding the Role of the Built Environment in Safety and Quality Improvem ent . Jeff Brady, MD, MPH, AHRQ Craig M. Zimring , Ph.D., Georgia Inst. of Tech. James P. Steinberg, MD, Emory U. Douglas B. Kamerow, MD, MPH, RTI. Welcome and Overview. Jeff Brady, MD, MPH

erol
Download Presentation

Understanding the Role of the Built Environment in Safety and Quality Improvem ent

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Understanding the Role of the Built Environment in Safety and Quality Improvement Jeff Brady, MD, MPH, AHRQ Craig M. Zimring, Ph.D., Georgia Inst. of Tech. James P. Steinberg, MD, Emory U. Douglas B. Kamerow, MD, MPH, RTI

  2. Welcome and Overview Jeff Brady, MD, MPH Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

  3. The Role of the Built Environment in Safety and Quality Craig Zimring, PhD Georgia Institute of Technology

  4. Hospitals are Unnecessarily Dangerous, Costly and Stressful • 48,000 to 98,000 die annually due to preventable medical errors (IOM, 2000) • 1 in 20 patients contract infections during care; new highly antibiotic resistant pathogens, persistent problems with MRSA, C difficile(CDC, 2012) • $750 billion of annual healthcare costs are wasted; 30% of the total (IOM, 2012)

  5. Design Strategies & Variables Patient, Family, Staff& Organizational Outcomes Evidence-Based Design Causal Model Mediators & Process Variables Moderators • Culture • Care process • Demographics of patients & staff • Acuity Ulrich, Zimring et al 2008

  6. Low visibility rooms had a 30% higher mortality rate (82.1% and 64.0%) for high acuity patients Source: (Leaf, Homel & Factor, 2010)

  7. Visibility Patient Groups by Visibility 2 High-visibility Patient Group PT (upper half body) visible from both the corridor and the nearby nurses’ station Moderate-visibility Patient Group PT (upper half body) visible only from the corridor Low-visibility Patient Group PT (upper half body) NOT visible from the corridor Low visibility rooms had a 31% higher fall rate (Choi, 2012)

  8. Lighting Sunlight Affects Length of Stay and Analgesic Use Dying in the Dark Patients exposed to 46% more natural sunlight (lux/hours): Patients in A Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: • Women stayed one day less in sunnier room (2.3 v 3.3 days) • Death rate was 70% higher in dull rooms (39/335 v 21/293) • 22% fewer analgesics • Higher impact on younger patients • Higher impact on higher analgesic users • 21% lower drug costs • Less pain, stress Source: Beauchemin & Hays (1998) Source: Walch et al (2005)

  9. Design Strategies & Variables Placement of hand washing rubs and sinks Single rooms Layout Provisions for family Provisions for teamwork Acoustic features Materials Reminder systems Variable acuity rooms Same-handed rooms Patient, Family, Staff& Organizational Outcomes Pain Analgesic use Errors Morbidity/mortality Infection rate Length of stay Satisfaction Care coordination Staff turnover/injuries Costs Failure to rescue Evidence-Based Design Causal Model Mediators & Process Variables • Communication • Movement • Hand-washing compliance • Noise • Stress • Natural light • Etc. Moderators • Culture • Care process • Demographics of patients & staff • Acuity Ulrich, Zimring et al 2008

  10. Evaluating the Current State of Evidence • Developing a conceptual framework describing the relationship between the built environment of healthcare facilities and HAI prevention • Conducting an environmental scan (lit review, guideline review, and expert interviews) to document the current knowledge about HAI prevention through the use of the built environment

  11. The HAI-DESIGN Team Kendall Hall, MD AHRQ RTI International Douglas Kamerow, MD Nancy Lefestey, MHA Emily Richmond, MPH Georgia Institute of Technology Craig Zimring, PhD Ellen Do, PhD David Cowan, MHS Megan Denham, MAEd AltugKasali, M.Arch. Emory University School of Medicine James P. Steinberg, MD Jesse T. Jacob, MD Amy Allison, MS

  12. CHAIN OF TRANSMISSION EXTERNAL SOURCE Human elements Transmission Sources and reservoirs of pathogens RESERVOIR or SOURCE IN THE HOSPITAL COLONIZEDor INFECTED HOST Patients HCWs Visitors COLONIZED or INFECTED HOST Patients HCWs Visitors HAI

  13. What Does the Evidence Tell Us? Craig M. Zimring, Ph.D. Georgia Institute of Technology

  14. More Evidence than We Expected Source: (Ulrich, Zimring et al, 2008)

  15. 2999 articles identified through searches Title review 119 duplicates eliminated 2880 articles reviewed for relevance 1724 discarded as irrelevant within the scope of this project Abstract review 1156 articles meet preliminary inclusion criteria Abstract review 374 articles eliminated (not specific to built environment) 782 articles remain after 2nd abstract review Papers from secondary scan (Additional articles, 74 grey literature) Full-paper review 190 articles identified to be included in four primary sub-groups 592 articles included in secondary sub-groups (see Figure 2 for sub-group details) 28 in “isolation” group 45 in “contact” group 57 in “air” group 60 in “water” group

  16. Increasing Hand Hygiene Compliance with the Built Environment Moving dispensers into line-of-sight increased hand hygiene compliance from 33.6% to 60% (Source: Nevo et al 2010)

  17. Technologies to Reduce Infection Risk: UVGI • HVAC components had moderate to heavy contamination pre-eUVGI installation All HVAC cultures negative at 6 months post Surface and air samples had moderate to heavy contamination pre-eUVGI installation All surface cultures negative at 6 months post 74% of tracheal aspirates were positive for pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosaand Klebsiella pneumoniae pre-eUVGI installation 55% of tracheal aspirates were positive at 6 months post 44% of tracheal aspirates were positive at 18 months post Source: (Ryan et al. 2011)

  18. Conclusions • Evidence for design is different than in medicine, but as important • Evidence is scattered • The built environment matters

More Related