1 / 43

P rof . Mirza Dili ć, MD, PhD, FESC, FACC Clinical Center Sarajevo

Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. P rof . Mirza Dili ć, MD, PhD, FESC, FACC Clinical Center Sarajevo Director Internal Clinics and Departments. Epidemiological data.

eros
Download Presentation

P rof . Mirza Dili ć, MD, PhD, FESC, FACC Clinical Center Sarajevo

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation Prof. MirzaDilić, MD, PhD, FESC, FACC Clinical Center Sarajevo Director Internal Clinics and Departments

  2. Epidemiological data ~15% of all strokes affectedpatients with AFib Risk of stroke in AFib patients who do not receive OAC or ATT is ~5% per year Prevalence of AFib is about 10% in patients age 80 yrs Patients of 75 yrs with AF have risk of thromboembolism > 4%

  3. Atrial fibrillation is an independent risk factors for stroke. Several factors increased the risk for stroke in elderly patients with AFib. Non-valvular AFib is associated with an increased risk of stroke.

  4. In the USA and Europe, about 20% of all hospital admissions have an AFib either primary or secondary diagnosis. • Patients with AFib may present with variety of symptoms, including; • palpitations, • exercise intolerance, • heart failure, • chest pain, • sincope, • dissiness, • and stroke.

  5. Loss of atrial systolic function results in • sluggish bloodflow in the atrium • Disturbed atrial endothelial function and • activation of coagulation factors, • Cloth formation in the atrium.

  6. Therapy of AFib, therefore, involvemeasures: • to control ventricular rates, • to restore and maintain sinus rhythm, • to prevent thromboembolic complications

  7. ACC / AHA / ESC Guidelines 2001

  8. ACCPGuidelines 2008

  9. CHADS2 scoring system isused as basis for risk stratification of thromboembolicevents • CHADS2 • Cardiac failure • Hypertension • Age, • Diabetes • Stroke (doubled)

  10. In CHADS2- 1 point is given for following clinical variables: • Recent CHF • Age over 75, • Hypertension, • Diabetes. • Prior Stroke – 2 points

  11. CHADS2 score of 0– should not require antithrombotic therapy. CHADS2 score of 1– maybe treated with Aspirin or Warfarin. CHADS2 score of 2 or more - should be treated with Warfarin with a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0

  12. Class I (Level of Evidence A) • Antithrombotic th. recommended in all pts with AF, except those with lone Afib, age < 65 yrs, or contraindications. • Antithrombotic agent should be chosen balansing - absolutes risk of stroke and bleeding and relative risk and benefit for given patient. • Warfarin (target INR 2.0 – 3.0) for patients with CHADS risk of 2 is recommended unless contraindicated.

  13. Class I (Level of Evidence A) • Patients with 1 “clinically non-major” risk factors are at intermediate risk and, • OAC therapy or, • Aspirin 75-325 mg • Patients with mechanical valve prosthesis • OAC therapy, maintaining INR of at least 2.5 (mitral) or 2.0 (aortal). (Level of Evidence B).

  14. Class IIa (Level of Evidence A,B) • Most patients with 1 “clinically relevant non-major” risk factor, should be considered for warfarin, rather than aspirin therapy. (A) • Patients with no risk factors, < 65 yrs, lone AF, none of the risk factors, no antithrombotic therapy should be considered, rather than aspirin. (B)

  15. Class IIa (Level of Evidence B,C) • Dual therapy with aspirin + clopidogrel in patients with contraindication to warfarin or refusal to use warfarin.(B) • In patients who are not at high risk and do not have mechanical valve prosthesis and going to procedure, interruption of OAC should be considered to up 48 hrs without bridging with heparin.(C)

  16. Class IIb (Level of Evidence C) • In patients who are at high risk and have mechanical valve prosthesis and going to procedure, bridging anticoagulation with LMWH or UH should be considered. (C) • If it is necessary to interrupt therapy for 1 week, in high risk patients, LMWH or UFH my be given.

  17. Class IIb (Level of Evidence C) • Following coronary revascularisation in patients with AF, warfarin may be interrupted, but resumed as soon as possible, with target INR. Aspirin may be given in hiatus. • For patients underwent PCI, clopidogrel 75 mg + warfain should be maintenance. • In BMS clopidogrel at least 1 month, sirolimus-eluting stents up to 3 months, and paclitaxel-eluting stent up to 6 months.

  18. For cardioverson of acute episodes that are of less than 48 hours’ duration, anticoagulation is not required. For episode that are of greater than 48 hours’ duration, or when duration is uncertain, 3 to 4 weeks of warfarin anticolgulation before cardioversion is recommended. In patients without risk factors for stroke, anticolagulation is maintained for at least 4 weeks after conversion.

  19. ACCPGuidelines 2012

  20. CHEST 2012 9 ed.Executive Summary Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines Guyatt GH, MD, FCCP,  Aki EA, MD, PhD, MPH, Crowther M, MD, Gutterman DD, MD, FCCP, Schuemann HJ, MD, PhD, FCCP, and for theAmerican College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Panel*

  21. Antithrombotic Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation (AF) For patients with AF, including those with paroxysmal AF, who are at low risk of stroke (eg, CHADS2 [congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack] score = 0), we suggest no therapy rather than antithrombotic therapy (Grade 2B). For patients who do choose antithrombotic therapy, we suggest aspirin (75 mg to 325 mg once daily) rather than oral anticoagulation (Grade 2B) or combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (Grade 2B).

  22. AF and intermediate risk of stroke For patients with AF, including those with paroxysmal AF, who are at intermediate risk of stroke(eg, CHADS2 score = 1), we recommend oral anticoagulationrather than no therapy (Grade 1B). We suggest oral anticoagulation rather than aspirin (75 mg to 325 mg once daily) (Grade 2B) or combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (Grade 2B). For patients who are unsuitable for or choose not to take an oral anticoagulant (for reasons other than concerns about major bleeding), we suggest combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel rather than aspirin (75 mg to 325 mg once daily) (Grade 2B). .

  23. AF and high risk of stroke For patients with AF, including those with paroxysmal AF, who are at high risk of stroke (eg, CHADS2 score = 2), we recommend oral anticoagulation rather than no therapy (Grade 1A), aspirin (75 mg to 325 mg once daily) (Grade 1B), or combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (Grade 1B). For patients with AF, including those with paroxysmal AF, for recommendations in favor of oral anticoagulation we suggest dabigatran 150 mg twice daily rather than adjusted-dose VKA therapy (target INR range, 2.0-3.0) (Grade 2B).

  24. Patients With AF and Mitral Stenosis For patients with AF and mitral stenosis, we recommend adjusted-dose VKA therapy (target INR range, 2.0-3.0) rather than no therapy, aspirin (75 mg to 325 mg once daily), or combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (all Grade 1B). For patients with AF and mitral stenosis who are unsuitable for or choose not to take adjusted-dose VKA therapy (for reasons other than concerns about major bleeding), we recommend combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel rather than aspirin (75 mg to 325 mg once daily) alone (Grade 1B).

  25. In ACC /AHA / ESC guideline 75 - 325 mg/day • ACCP guideline 75 -100 mg/day ESC/ACCP/ACC/AHA Opie et al. Aspirin

  26. Aspirin + warfarin • Aspirin + clopidogrel + warfarin • Aspirin 50 mg • Warfarin with target INR of 1.8 -2.0 Aspirin

  27. Novel antithrombotics

  28. Anti-thrombin – Dabigatran 150 mg. twice daily. By intention-to-treat, rivaroxaban was non-inferior to warfarin but did not achieve superiority. FDA approval

  29. Anti Xa - Rivaroxaban once daily. By intention-to-treat, rivaroxaban was non-inferior to warfarin. FDA approval

  30. Safety Similarrates of bleeding and adverse events Less CVI and fatal bleeding

  31. The key for optimal therapy is risk stratification. Appropriate balansing between benefit and risk of bleeding.

More Related