1 / 29

The need for complementary approaches

The need for complementary approaches. Fred Steward. A broad & inclusive concept of transition. A systemic view of innovation in terms of a diversity of actors and the embrace of both social and technological change

errol
Download Presentation

The need for complementary approaches

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The need for complementary approaches Fred Steward

  2. A broad & inclusive concept of transition • A systemic view of innovation in terms of a diversity of actors and the embrace of both social and technological change • A definition of technology in relation to some definition of societal use or ‘function’ • A concept of significant change in the sense of a clearly defined shift from one state to a new state • Sustainability goals

  3. Alternative theorisations of the dynamics of transition • Multilevel perspective • regime & niche • Technology innovation system • new technology system • Share an evolutionary framework • And others?

  4. Explaining variation & selection • MLP • Nested hierarchy • Interaction between levels • TIS • Emergent properties • System attributes

  5. Inviting wider participation • Two strands in science, technology & innovation studies that are underrepresented • Actor networks – Latour ‘flat network’ associational approach • Innovation management – interactional agency based strategies

  6. Situating technology systems 1 • The Freeman legacy - New technology systems 1982 - unemployment & technical innovation • Alternative theory to socially induced clusters of innovation (Mensch) • Role of scientific discovery • Technical & social constellations • Natural technology trajectories – mechanisation, electrification, automation

  7. Situating technology systems 2 • Freeman & Perez 1988 • Incremental • Radical • Technology System – pervasive across sectors, radical/incremental technology + organisational/managerial • Techno-economic paradigm

  8. Applicability to sustainability transitions • 1996 Greening of technology - Freeman • problems with…systemic model of innovation • world wide transition to a "green technoeconomic paradigm“ • Learning from the linear model

  9. Limits to a technology focus • The current policy context • Generic technologies

  10. Tony Blair - November 2004 ‘we need a green technological revolution’

  11. George Bush – 20 April 2006 • the technological revolution that we're pushing hard… so that we can be good stewards of the environment.

  12. Wen Jiabao October 2005 • A global revolution in science and technology… • Building an environment friendly society & sustainable development

  13. The new revolutionary technological determinism • Emerging bio & nano technologies will deliver radical sustainability • Key policy issue is research investment in new emerging technologies • The knowledge economy/ sustainable society virtuous circle • Relies on technology push model

  14. Ecological modernisation • Emerging technologies are more sustainable • Upstream support is main policy concern • Consumption downplayed

  15. An alternative innovation focus • The sociotechnical • Production and consumption • Reflexive action vs system design

  16. Actor orientation • Reflexive action vs system design • Heterogeneous engineer, system builder, path creator • Innovative entrepreneur, innovation journey

  17. Organisational actors in transitions • Niche actors (Kemp, Geels) • Path creators (Garud & Karnoe) • Disruptive innovators (Christensen)

  18. Business research on organisation & strategy • Beyond the ‘iron cage’ or ‘rational actor’ • Strategic choice (Child) • Emergent strategy (Mintzberg) • Sensemaking (Weick) • Communities of practice (Wenger)

  19. Innovation & the business organisation • Intersection of: • Organisation studies – Burns & Stalker, Lawrence & Lorsch - focus on firm, organic structure • Science & technology studies - Freeman, Marquis – focus on innovation, the interactive model

  20. The new interactionism • Paradox & dilemma – Peters, Kanter • Networks – Allen, Granovetter • Construction & association – Pinch, Latour • The power of communicative action

  21. Embracing cognitive diversity • Combining different cognitive perspectives • Prefigured path (life cycle) • Purposeful enactment (teleology) • Conflict and synthesis (dialectics) • Competitive selection (evolution) • Van de Ven

  22. The ambidextrous organisation • Tushman, Leonard Barton, Christensen • The innovator’s dilemma • Exploitation vs exploration • Continuity vs change • Capabilities vs rigidities

  23. Networks – relational capabilities • Network as general process • Strong & weak ties • Homophily & heterophily • Boundary spanners & gatekeepers • Network builders

  24. The power of discourse • Storylines, narratives, arguments • Explain strategic choice within firms and their capacity to shape futures

  25. Emerging innovation networks • Techno vs eco focus • Incumbents & emergents • Different consequences for variety generation • No natural trajectories of dematerialisation, decarbonisation

  26. An example • Contrast between emerging networks around sustainability of print on paper • Forestry • GM trees / community forestry • Paper manufacture • Nanoparticles / deinking fibre recovery • Publishing • E-book / paperless practices

  27. A situated emergent network approach • Focus on sustainability claims for specific innovations within emerging generic technologies • Capture innovations emerging in the market and identify commercial performance claims • Map the emerging sociotechnical network and its dynamics • Use results for reflexive engagement

  28. Nanoparticle network

  29. Results • It seems possible to capture early emergent networks by following the actors • Focus is defined by actors and varies in emphasis on technology and ecology • Variety generation gives different emphasis to sustainability • Influence through key actors

More Related