Division of Undergraduate Education Funding Opportunities from EHR/DUE Jane Prey jprey@nsf.gov Paul Tymann ptymann@nsf.

1. Division of Undergraduate EducationFunding Opportunities from EHR/DUE Jane Prey jprey@nsf.gov Paul Tymann ptymann@nsf.gov

2. Who Are We? • National Science Foundation • An independent federal agency created by Congress in 1950 "to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense…“ • Part of the executive branch • Very important – controlled/managed by the executive branch and congress

3. NSF STEM Workforce Priorities • Prepare students to be leaders, teachers, and innovators in emerging and rapidly changing STEM fields • Develop a scientifically literate populace Both depend on the nature and quality of the undergraduate education experience

4. NSF Investments Research-based and research-generating approaches to: • Understand/advance STEM learning • Design, test, and study curricular change • Widely disseminate and implement best practices • Broaden participation of individuals and institutions in STEM fields

5. NSF Goals • Develop the STEM/STEM-related workforce • Advance science • Broaden participation in STEM • Educate a STEM-literate populace • Build capacity in higher education • Improve K-12 STEM education • Encourage life-long learning

6. Directorates • Office of the Director • BIO • CISE • EHR • ENG • GEO • MPS • SBE

7. EHR Areas of Investment • Experiential learning • Assessment/metrics of learning and practice • Scholarships • Foundational education research • Professional development • Institutional change • Formal and informal learning environments • Undergraduate disciplinary research

8. Divisions • Front Office • Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL) • Graduate Education (DGE) • Human Resource Development (HRD) • Undergraduate Education (DUE)

9. Computer Science in EHR/DUE Valerie Barr – vbarr@nsf.gov Jane Prey – jprey@nsf.gov Paul Tymann – ptymann@nsf.gov

10. Division of Undergraduate EducationImproving Undergraduate STEM EducationProgram(IUSE)Program Description:NSF 14-7513

11. Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) • Website:http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=504976924 • Proposal Target Date:February 4, 2014

12. iUSE Overview • Supports projects that address immediate challenges and opportunities facing undergraduate STEM education. • Replacing, joining together and expanding upon the former WIDER, STEP and TUES solicitations. • The program is brief and unconstrained.

13. IUSE Objectives NSF is seeking projects that: • Increase student retention in STEM • Prepare students to participate in science for tomorrow • Improve students' STEM learning outcomes • Generate knowledge on how students learn and on effective practice in undergraduate classrooms • Broaden participation

14. IUSE Projects • DUE supports the improvement of the undergraduate STEM education enterprise through funding the following: • Projects that build on fundamental research in undergraduate STEM education and prior R&D • Research on design, development, and wide-spread implementation of effective STEM learning/teaching knowledge and practice • Foundational research on student learning

15. iUSE Projects (cont.) • Projects should be evidence based or evidence generating • As with any NSF proposal, you will need to address the intellectual merit and broader impacts of your idea. • You might find the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development (NSF 13-126) a useful resource • Now is the time to try to get funding for those projects you have in mind that never quite fit one of the “boxes” • PLEASE put Computer Science or Computing in your title!! This will help us make sure your proposal is put into the correct panel!!

16. IDEAS Labs • In FY14, NSF is also accepting proposals for developing “IDEAS Labs”in biology, engineering, and geosciences

17. NSF Merit Review Principles • NSF projects should be of the highest quality and have the potential to advance, if not transform, the frontiers of knowledge • NSF projects, in the aggregate, should contribute more broadly to achieving societal goals • Meaningful assessment and evaluation of NSF funded projects should be based on appropriate metrics, keeping in mind the likely correlation between the effect of broader impacts and the resources provided to implement projects

18. NSF Merit Review Criteria • Intellectual Merit – the potential to advance knowledge. • Broader Impacts – the potential to benefit society and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal outcomes. Both criteria, Intellectual Merit and Broader Impact, will be given full consideration during the review and decision-making processes. Proposers must fully address both criteria.

19. Merit Review Considerations • What is the potential for the proposed activity to: • Advance knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields (Intellectual Merit);and • Benefit society or advance desired societal outcomes (Broader Impacts)? • To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative, original or potentially transformative concepts? • Is the plan for carrying out the proposed activities well-reasoned, well-organized, and based on a sound rationale? Does the plan incorporate a mechanism to assess success?

20. Merit Review Considerations • How well qualified is the individual, team, or organization to conduct the proposed activities? • Are there adequate resources available to the PI (either at the home institution or through collaborations) to carry out the proposed activities? Please Note: Reviewers are also asked to review Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources, Data Management Plan, and Postdoctoral Researcher Mentoring Plan

21. GRANT PROPOSAL GUIDEChecklist for Proposal Preparation • “Complete proposals help expedite review and processing. To assure that research and other proposals submitted to the Foundation are complete, an administrative check should be made before mailing.” • The GPG Checklist for Proposal Preparation can be found at: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2000/nsf002/apx_b.htm

22. Common Questions

23. Will there be a program solicitation or RFP for IUSE? • There will NOTbe an official solicitation for IUSE, only the Program Description • The guidance for proposal preparation is the NSF Grants Proposal Guide (GPG) • Grant Proposal Guide website: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf13001/gpg_index.jsp.

24. What is a Program Description? • "The term "program description" includes broad, general descriptions of programs and activities in NSF Directorates/Offices and Divisions • GPG Proposal Checklist (page II-31-33)

25. Will there be budget limits? • No. • The Program Description does not include budget limits. • The project budget should be appropriate for the proposed effort. http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=504976&org=DUE&from=home

26. What is a target date? • Proposals received on or before the target date will be considered for FY 2014 funding.

27. Are there any identified categories or tracks? • PD 14-7513 does not describe categories or tracks. • PLEASE put Computer Science or Computing in your title so we can easily identify you!

28. Is the Project Description still limited to 15 pages? • The Project Description (including Results from Prior NSF Support, which is limited to 5 pages) may NOT exceed 15 pages. • Visual materials, including charts, graphs, maps, photographs and other pictorial presentations are included in the 15-page limitation (GPG Chapter II.D.ii). http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf13001/gpg_2.jsp#IIC2dii).

29. Does IUSE allow proposals of five-year duration? • Grants are normally awarded for one to three years. The Foundation encourages PIs to request awards for durations of three to five years when such durations are necessary for completion of the proposed work and are technically and managerially advantageous" (GPG Chapter Ii.C.2.a.b) http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf13001/gpg_2.jsp#IIC2a).

30. How many proposals may I submit? • The Program Description does not limit the number of submissions http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=504976&org=DUE&from=home

31. Should the proposal have a dissemination plan? • The spread of the use of effective approaches to STEM education requires outreach to the community, including presentation at professional society meetings, workshops, publication, and other mechanisms. • Under all NSF awards, investigators are expected to promptly prepare and submit for publication, with authorship that accurately reflects the contributions of those involved, all significant findings from work conducted under NSF grants. NSF Awards and Administration Guide (AAG) Chapter VI.D.4.a contains further information: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf13001/aag_6.jsp

32. May I submit letters of support, commitment, or collaboration? • ”Documentation of collaborative arrangements of significance to the proposal through letters of commitment" can be submitted (GPG Chapter II.C.2.j.)http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf13001/gpg_2.jsp#IIC2j • ”Any substantial collaboration with individuals not included in the budget should be described and documented with a letter from each collaborator, which should be provided in the supplementary documentation section of the FastLane Proposal Preparation Module" (GPG Chapter II.C.2.d.(iv))http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf13001/gpg_2.jsp#IIC2div) • "Letters of support should NOT be submitted as they are not a standard component of an NSF proposal” (GPG Chapter II.C.2.j. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf13001/gpg_index.jsp

33. Are Appendices allowed? • Appendices, other than letters of commitment, may NOTbe included unless a deviation has been authorized • All information necessary for the review of a proposal must be contained in Sections A through I of the proposal http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf13001/gpg_index.jsp

34. Can I submit a proposal prepared in response to a previous DUE program? (e.g., TUES, WIDER, or STEP) • You could submit a proposal prepared for one of those programs to the IUSE program. However, it should be noted that the IUSE program description provides fewer restrictions and, thus, an opportunity for greater creative freedom than the previous programs. • A stronger proposal is one for which the PI team has considered more directly the structure of the proposed project in meeting the goal of IUSE to “address immediate challenges and opportunities facing undergraduate STEM education, as well as those that anticipate new structures and function of the undergraduate STEM learning and teaching enterprise.”

35. Is laboratory equipment an allowed budget item in IUSE? • "Allowable items ordinarily will be limited to research equipment and apparatus not already available for the conduct of the work. General-purpose equipment, such as a personal computer and office furnishings, are not eligible for support unless primarily or exclusively used in the actual conduct of the proposed research." • GPG Chapter II. C. 2. g.: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf13001/gpg_2.jsp#IIC2g.

36. Is an advisory board (internal or external) required? • PD 14-7513 does not specify the need for an internal or external advisory board

37. Must a project be evidence-based or evidence-generating? • As per the Program Description: “Proposals should describe projects that build on available evidence and theory, and that will generate evidence and build knowledge”

38. Do I need to present baseline data and a theory of change? • If the rationale for your project and the basis and execution of its activities can be illuminated by such data or any other data or information, then you are encouraged to provide it

39. Do I need to include a Data Management Plan with my proposal? • Yes. “Proposals must include a supplementary document of no more than two pages labeled “Data Management Plan”. This supplement should describe how the proposal will conform to NSF policy on the dissemination and sharing of research results.” • See the GPG, Chapter II.C.2.j: • http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf11001/gpg_2.jsp#dmp. • See the AAG Chapter VI.D.4: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf11001/aag_6.jsp#VID4.

40. Do I need to include a Postdoctoral Fellow Mentoring Plan with my proposal? • Yes, if you are requesting support for postdoctoral fellows. • “Each proposal that requests funding to support postdoctoral researchersmust include, as a supplementary document, a description of the mentoring activities that will be provided for such individuals.” • See the GPG, Chapter II.C.2.j: • http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf11001/gpg_2.jsp#dmp.

41. What are the Common Guidelines for Educational Research and where can I find them? • The Guidelines were developed to “establish cross-agency guidelines for improving the quality, coherence, and pace of knowledge development in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education” (NSF 13-126) • The Common Guidelines (NSF 13-126): http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf13126 • A related FAQ (NSF 13-127): http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2013/nsf13127/nsf13127.jsp

42. Must my proposal fit into one of the six types of education research described in the Common Guidelines? • No. • However, if you choose to fit your proposal into one of the six types, you should identify it

43. Who can I contact for advice on IUSE? Biological Sciences Kathleen Bergin – kbergin@nsf.gov Katherine Denniston – kdennist@nsf.gov Gregory Goins – ggoins@nsf.gov Joan Prival - jprival@nsf.gov Terry Woodin – twoodin@nsf.gov Chemistry Niki Bennett – nbennett@nsf.gov David Brown – drbrown@nsf.gov Dawn Rickey – drickey@nsf.gov Herbert Richtol – hrichtol@nsf.gov

44. Who can I contact for advice on IUSE? Computer Science Valerie Barr – vbarr@nsf.gov Jane Prey – jprey@nsf.gov Paul Tymann – ptymann@nsf.gov Engineering Amy Chan Hilton – achanhil@nsf.gov Susan Finger – sfinger@nsf.gov Gul Kremer – gkremer@nsf.gov John Krupczak – jkrupcza@nsf.gov Don Millard – dmillard@nsf.gov Yvette Weatherton – yweather@nsf.gov

45. Who can I contact for advice on IUSE? Geosciences Amy Chan Hilton – achanhil@nsf.gov Mathematics John Haddock – jhaddock@nsf.gov Michael Jacobson – mjacobso@nsf.gov Lee Zia – lzia@nsf.gov Physics Joyce Evans – jevans@nsf.gov Duncan McBride – dmcbride@nsf.gov

46. Who can I contact for advice on IUSE? Social Science and Behavioral Sciences Myles Boylan – mboylan@nsf.gov Connie Della-Piana – cdellapi@nsf.gov Interdisciplinary Myles Boylan – mboylan@nsf.gov Corby Hovis – chovis@nsf.gov Herbert Richtol – hrichtol@nsf.gov Terry Woodin – twoodin@nsf.gov

47. Who can I contact for advice on IUSE? Research/Evaluation/Common Guidelines for Educational Research Myles Boylan – mboylan@nsf.gov Connie Della-Piana – cdellapi@nsf.gov Dawn Rickey – drickey@nsf.gov

48. Questions? • Website:http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=504976924 • Target Date: • February 4, 2014