1 / 41

Measurement in STD research

Measurement in STD research. Why Pool Specimens? . Pooling serum sample for HIV testing was found to be accurate and has been used to reduce the cost of enzyme linked immunoabsorbent assays (ELISA) for detection of antibody to HIV

eryk
Download Presentation

Measurement in STD research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Measurement in STD research

  2. Why Pool Specimens? • Pooling serum sample for HIV testing was found to be accurate and has been used to reduce the cost of enzyme linked immunoabsorbent assays (ELISA) for detection of antibody to HIV • To develop population estimates of disease prevalence and, in a multistep process, to determine which individual sample is positive

  3. Tests Based on Genetic Markers • Non-amplified use a nucleic acid probe to detect the extremely small amount of an infectious organism’s unique genetic sequence (nucleic acid) • Amplified tests first make copies of the organism’s genetic sequence and magnify the “signal” of the organism (I.e. PCR, LCR • Less expensive and require less handling considerations than culture • May be less sensitive for some pathogens (but as good as culture for chlamydia and herpes) • FDA approved for CT, GC, and HIV

  4. Evaluating Screening Tests

  5. Culture vs. LCR

  6. PCR vs Culture

  7. PCR vs LCR

  8. Surrogate Markers in AIDS Research • How do we study the relationship between immunologic and virologic parameters in HIV infected individuals? • Cross-sectional studies • Obscure or unknown relationship of the marker to HIV disease pathology • Technical barriers • Inherent complexity of the marker validation process

  9. Surrogate Markers • CD4 cell counts • Weak as a surrogate marker: treatment- induced increases in CD4 cell counts only partially account for the improved clinical benefit seen with new therapies • HIV RNA Viral Load • Good indicator of antiretroviral drug activity • Strong predictor of clinical outcome

  10. Discrepant Analysis • Discrepant analysis uses a combination of reference standards applied at two stages • Discordant cells are tested with the “gold standard” in an attempt to resolve the “discrepant” results

  11. Discrepant Analysis • Advantages • Provides a cost savings (testing with the “gold standard” is not performed on all specimens • Limitations • Significant bias even under “ideal” conditions

  12. Discrepant Analysis • Attempts to provide estimates of sensitivity and specificity in the presence of an imperfect gold-standard. • In the example of CT, apparent false positives are subjected to additional testing with DFA (direct immuno-fluorescence) or MOMP (major outer membrane protein) if any of these test positive than the original false is reclassified as true positive. • This analysis produces an upwardly biased estimate (Hadgu)

  13. Discrepant Analysis Bias • Concordant specimens are not tested with the “gold standard” • These specimens are assumed to be true positives and true negatives – although they may not be • Not testing the concordant cells potentiall introduces bias – which direction?

  14. Magnitude of the Bias • Amount of bias depends on the number of false results • False positive will occur more commonly with low prevalence • False negatives with high prevalence • Measured sensitivity and specificity will equal the true sensitivity and spcificity if: all false results of the new test must be discordant with results of the accepted standard (no misclassification of true positive or true negatives)

  15. Effect of the Bias • Sensitivity is a concern with low disease prevalence • Specificity is a problem with high disease prevalence • (See Figure 1 in Miller, WC. Bias in discrepant analysis: when two wrongs don’t make a right. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:219-231)

  16. Strategies to Reduce the Bias • If a “gold standard” exists – test all specimens using the GS • If no GS exists use the best “alloyed standard” or a combination of tests

  17. Should we use Discrepant Analysis? • “Discrepant analysis should be avoided if at all possible” (Miller, WC) • What happens if a “gold standard” doesn’t exist? • Minimize bias through multiple testing using “alloyed standards”

  18. Contraception • Important in STD research because it causes behavior change • It is associated with lesser incentive to have protective sex • May have some protective effect in certain diseases. • 7 of 10 sexually active women do not want to become pregnant (AGI, 1988) • Unintended pregancies result in 1.4 abortions and 1.1 unwanted births. • 80% of teen pregnancies are unintended • Each year 1 in 10 15-19 year old girls become pregnant

  19. Contraception and Women’s reproductive health

  20. Contraception

  21. Prevalence of Contraceptive Methods in US 1993

  22. Sterilization • Tubal • Vasectomy • Hysterectomy • No STI protection • Return to fertility is possible

  23. Norplant - implants • levonorgestrel • last 5 years • prevents ovulation , causes luteal insufficiency, impaired oocyte maturation and progestin-induced hostile cervical mucus • No STI prevention • return to fertility is rapid

  24. Depo provera • depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) - The Shot • last 3-4 months • can cause menstrual changes, irregular bleeding, spotting, amenorrhea, headaches • return to fertility can be one year • No STI prevention

  25. Emergency Contraception - Post Coital contraception • Has been available for 25 years. Could prevent 1.7 million unintended pregnancies and 800,00 abortions • OCPs taken (1st dose within 72 hours and 2nd dose 12 hours later) or IUD is inserted (up to 5 days after unprotected coitus) • Is not abortion. It delays ovulation

  26. 11 brands of OCPs can be used for the Yuzpe method of EC

  27. Abortion Pill • Only Mifepristone (RU486) is FDA approved • Antiprogesterone drug – a key hormone in the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy. Given with prostaglandins • Used up to 49-63 days from LMP • prevent implantation • No STI prevention

  28. Oral Contraception • Prevents ovulation by suppressing pituitary gonadotropin secretion. • Monophasic - constant dose of estrogen and progestin in 21 active tablets • Progestin-only oral low dose contraceptives (mini-pills) • Phasic alter progestin and estrogen. • Associated with increased cervial chlamydia; protective against symptomatic PID

  29. Health Benefits of OCP • Prevention of gynecologic cancer (epithelial ovarian cancer and endometrial adenocarcinoma) • Menstrual improvements (regularity, less dysmenorrhea, few days and amount of flow, less anemia, restoration of regular menses in anovulatory women) • Prevention of benign conditions (breast fibroadenoma, ectopic pregnancy) • Possible benefits (atherosclerosis, severe rheumatoid arthritis)

  30. Intrauterine device • copper intrauterine implant Copper T 380A IUD - creates intrauterine environment that is spermicidal • progesterone-releasing IUD (Progestasert) inhibit sperm survival and implantation. • PID can result if CT or GC are present • No STI prevention

  31. Natural Methods • Periodic abstinence (calendar method, temperature method, cervical mucus method, symptothermal method) • Lactational contraception • Withdrawal • None of these method provide STI prevention • Fertility return is rapid

  32. Barrier Methods • Latex Condom • Diaphragms and cervical caps • spermicidal foams, films, jellies or suppositories • Do protect against STIs

  33. Diaphragm and Cervical Cap • Diaphragm 80-94% effective • Cervical cap 60-90% effective • Not effective against STDs • can be messy • cost $13-$25, exam $150 • only four sizes of cervical caps (hard to fit all women)

  34. Foams and suppositories

  35. Vaginal Contraceptive Film • Can't be felt by either partner • Effective for up to one hour • Nothing to remove Begins to dissolve instantly • Used by thousands of clinics • Contains: 28% Nonoxynol 9, the spermicide most recommended by doctors • Numerous clinical studies conducted worldwide on safety and efficacy

  36. Male Methods • Condoms • Vasectomy • Others

  37. Common invasive diagnostics • Gynecological exam • Colposcopy • Laparoscopy

  38. Non-invasive diagnostics • Urine DNA amplification • Self-swabs • Self-administered tampons

More Related