1 / 41

Segment Protection Models

Segment Protection Models. M Vinod Kumar Dr. Abhay Karandikar. Agenda. Definitions and Abbreviations Prior art Possible models Comparison of models. Definitions and Abbreviations.

esben
Download Presentation

Segment Protection Models

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Segment Protection Models M Vinod Kumar Dr. Abhay Karandikar

  2. Agenda • Definitions and Abbreviations • Prior art • Possible models • Comparison of models

  3. Definitions and Abbreviations • Segment: A logical management entity defined over transitive closure of bridges and LANs or linear/open chain of connected bridges • Segment Edge Bridge (SEB): The bridge that defines end point of a segment • Infrastructure Segment (IS): • Data-path Segment (DS): • BB-BEB: 3-tupple translation bridge that translates incoming TESI to outgoing TESI. At finer granularity is may also do I-SID grooming.

  4. Prior Arts • Eilat (May Interim) • Tejas presents SPS as means to solve P2MP protection • ay-Abhay-Protection-Switching-for-P2MP-0508.ppt • Denver (July Plenary) • Jointly with Huawei and Adtran • new-sultan-fast-reroute-te-0708-v02.pdf • Seoul (Sept Interim) • Huawei presents interpretations • new-sultan-segment-protection-scaling-0908-v01.pps • Nortel presents issues to address • new-martin-PBB-TE-segment-prot-0908-v01.pdf • Tejas presents case for SPS • new-Protection-Vinod-Case-for-Segment-Protection-0908-v1.pps • Dallas (Nov Plenary) • Tejas uploads document on case for SPS • new-Vinod-SegmentProtectionSwitching-1108-v01.doc • No new work prez due to Lack of time • new-martin-PBB-TE-segment-prot-1108-v00.pdf • new-sultan-segment-protection-requirements-1108-v02.pdf • New Orleans (Jan Interim) • Tejas, Nortel, Huawei, ZTE, Adtran, …

  5. Segment Protection Models • Server Layer Model • Triple MAC or Mac-in-Mac-in-Mac • Triple Q or B-VID-in-B-VID or New VID-Ethertype • Segmented Domain Model • Segmented Q-in-Q • Segmented PBB-TE (B-B BEB)

  6. Server Layer Models Triple MAC Triple Q

  7. Triple MAC

  8. Triple MAC (SEB in middle) Work-IS 1 2 3 4 5 SEB I-tagged frame Protect-IS IB-BEB NMS trace route will be issue: inner domain is invisible to outer domain- whether it is 1-2-3-4 or 1-2-5-3-4? B-tagged frame BCB

  9. Model Components When SEB is not at the BEB S-tagged frame I-comp I-tagged MiM frame B-comp B-tagged MiM frame

  10. Triple MAC (SEB at Edge) IB-IB-BI-BI BI-IB Primary-IS 1 2 3 4 5 SEB I-tagged frame Backup-IS IB-BEB B-tagged frame BCB

  11. Model Component When SEB is at the BEB S-tagged frame I-comp B-comp I-comp B-comp B-tagged frame

  12. Operations and Integrity • SEB => I-comp + B-comp (Can we avoid I-comp? No) • If SEB is defined at node 4 instead of node 2 or 3 then MAC-in-MAC-in-MAC function is needed at node 4 • New and complex Chip • Integrity breaks or is not applicable as original M-i-M frame acts as client layer to the Segment Server layer • 1:1 PG integrity is not same as e2e service integrity • NMS trace route function has to maintain two valid routes 1-2-3-4 and 1-2-5-3-4 • Throughput decreases • Provisioning over segment cannot be done independently of e2e provisioning • This is contrary to Client and Server layer principle which assumes that provisioning in client and server are independent

  13. Final Model Component When SEB is not at the BEB S-tagged frame I-comp I-tagged MiM frame B-comp B-tagged MiM frame When SEB is at the BEB S-tagged frame I-comp B-comp I-comp B-comp B-tagged frame

  14. No Fault Single Fault ? ? Forwarding Ambiguity Problem • Forwarding Ambiguity arises in the two segments given below because • forwarding in Datapath segments is based on end-to-end DA+B-VID • node 5 cannot know if fault is in link 2-3 or 3-4 Primary-IS Primary-IS 1 2 3 4 Backup-IS 5 SEB I-tagged frame Backup-IS IB-BEB B-tagged frame BCB

  15. IB-IB-BI-BI BI-IB No Forwarding Ambiguity Primary-IS Primary-IS 1 2 3 4 Backup-IS 5 SEB I-tagged frame Backup-IS IB-BEB There is no forwarding ambiguity as the 3-tuple is different for every segment B-tagged frame BCB

  16. Triple Q

  17. Triple Q (SEB in Middle) Primary-IS 1 2 3 4 Additional VLAN tag for each segment 5 SEB I-tagged frame Backup-IS IB-BEB B-tagged frame BCB

  18. Model Component When SEB is not at the BEB B-tagged QiQ frame S-comp S-tagged QiQiQ frame New Ethertype?

  19. S-BI S-S Triple Q (SEB at Edge) Primary-IS Primary-IS 1 2 3 4 Backup-IS 5 SEB I-tagged frame Backup-IS IB-BEB B-tagged frame BCB

  20. Model Component When SEB is at the BEB S-tagged frame IB-comp S-comp S-tagged QiQiQ frame B-tagged QiQ frame New Ethertype?

  21. Operations and Integrity • SEB => S-comp + S-comp • If segment is defined at node 4 instead of node 2 or 3 then Q-in-Q-in-Q function is needed • New and complex Chip • Integrity breaks or is not applicable as original M-i-M frame acts as client layer to the Segment Server layer • 1:1 PG integrity is not same as e2e service integrity • Throughput decreases • NMS trace-route issue just as in Triple-MAC

  22. Final Model Component When SEB is not at the BEB B-tagged QiQ frame S-comp S-tagged QiQiQ frame New Ethertype? When SEB is at the BEB S-tagged frame IB-comp S-comp S-tagged QiQiQ frame B-tagged QiQ frame New Ethertype?

  23. S-S VIDs are different for every cascaded segments protecting the same service No Forwarding Ambiguity S-BI Primary-IS Primary-IS 1 2 3 4 Backup-IS 5 SEB I-tagged frame Backup-IS IB-BEB B-tagged frame BCB

  24. Segmented Domain Models Segmented Q Segmented PBB-TE or BB-BEB

  25. Segmented Q (SEB in Middle) Even though Segment is not defined between 3-4 new VLAN is needed Primary-IS 1 2 3 4 New VLAN tag for each segment 5 SEB I-tagged frame Backup-IS IB-BEB B-tagged frame BCB

  26. Model Component Internal point When SEB is not at the BEB B-tagged MiM frame B-comp I-tagged MiM frame B-comp B-tagged MiM frame

  27. Segmented Q (SEB at BEB) B-I B-B Primary-IS Primary-IS 1 2 3 4 New VLAN tag for each segment Backup-IS 5 SEB I-tagged frame Backup-IS IB-BEB B-tagged frame BCB

  28. Model Component When SEB is at the BEB S-tagged frame I-comp B-comp B-tagged MiM frame

  29. Operations and Integrity • Maintaining same end-to-end ESP-VID is impossible sometimes • B-VLAN translation => B-comp + B-comp • I-SID shall not be multiplexed or looked into • B-MAC remains same end-to-end; only VID changes • Blue VID terminates at 2 on to a protection group: PG(cyan, Red) • PG(cyan, Red) terminates on Brown VID (or on Blue to maintain ESP-VID requirements) • Integrity breaks or is not applicable as VID in original M-i-M frame changes within the Segment Domain • 1:1 PG integrity is not same as e2e service integrity • Throughput does not decrease as frame size is same

  30. Final Model Component Internal point When SEB is not at the BEB B-tagged MiM frame B-comp I-tagged MiM frame B-comp B-tagged MiM frame When SEB is at the BEB S-tagged frame I-comp B-comp B-tagged MiM frame

  31. No Forwarding Ambiguity B-I B-B Primary-IS Primary-IS 1 2 3 4 Backup-IS 5 SEB I-tagged frame Backup-IS IB-BEB B-MAC remains unchanged so to prevent forwarding ambiguity VID should be different B-tagged frame BCB

  32. Segmented PBB-TE or B-B BEB

  33. Segmented PBB-TE or BB-BEB (SEB in Middle) Irrespective of Segment defined between 3-4 new VLAN is needed Primary-IS 1 2 3 4 New 3-tupple for each segment 5 SEB I-tagged frame Backup-IS IB-BEB B-tagged frame BCB

  34. Model Component Internal point When SEB is at the BEB B-tagged MiM frame B-comp I-tagged MiM frame B-comp B-tagged MiM frame

  35. Segmented PBB-TE or BB-BEB (SEB at BEB) B-I B-B Primary-IS Primary-IS 1 2 3 4 New 3-tupple for each segment Backup-IS 5 SEB I-tagged frame Backup-IS IB-BEB B-tagged frame BCB

  36. Model Component When SEB is at the BEB S-tagged frame I-comp B-comp B-tagged MiM frame

  37. Operations and Integrity • SEB => B-comp + B-comp • TESI translation, incoming TESI is mapped to outgoing TESI • At finer granularity I-SID mux-demux can also be done • Smaller PBB-TE segments interacting as peers • Integrity is not applicable as original M-i-M frame terminates and new M-i-M frame starts • PG function is same as defined in e2e service • N:1 PG to be defined • Throughput remains same

  38. Final Model Component Internal point When SEB is not at the BEB B-tagged MiM frame B-comp I-tagged MiM frame B-comp B-tagged MiM frame When SEB is at the BEB S-tagged frame I-comp B-comp B-tagged MiM frame

  39. No Forwarding Ambiguity B-I B-B Primary-IS Primary-IS 1 2 3 4 Backup-IS 5 SEB I-tagged frame Backup-IS IB-BEB 3-tupple differs from segment to segment so there will never arise forwarding ambiguity B-tagged frame BCB

  40. Pros and Cons

  41. Questions?

More Related