1 / 6

Challenges of Sleeping Nodes

Challenges of Sleeping Nodes. Margaret Wasserman Painless Security, LLC mrw@painless-security.com. What Are Sleeping Nodes?. Small, low-cost, battery-powered nodes often “sleep” to extend battery life Keep just enough of the system on to wake up on schedule

esma
Download Presentation

Challenges of Sleeping Nodes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Challenges of Sleeping Nodes Margaret Wasserman Painless Security, LLC mrw@painless-security.com

  2. What Are Sleeping Nodes? • Small, low-cost, battery-powered nodes often “sleep” to extend battery life • Keep just enough of the system on to wake up on schedule • Radio receiver and transmitter are off • All high-power chips (radio chips, CPU) are off • Wake up periodically to perform functions • Sensors: Take/report sensor readings • Actuators: Poll for events/messages, take appropriate actions • Devices may sleep 99% of the time, or more

  3. Protocol Challenges • Sleeping nodes are not “always on” • Increasing number of IETF protocols expect nodes to be “always on”, including IPv6 ND & DAD. • Most multicast protocols don’t work well for sleeping nodes • Costs of leaving and rejoining a network or application may be prohibitive • IP no longer provides best-effort delivery • Need to determine you are on the same network before using IP address(es) -- DNA, DHCP • Need to reestablish Neighbor Cache entries before sending packets • Verbose Protocols • Every round trip requires receiver to stay on for another RTT • Congestion concerns are not the only reason to limit message size • Longer packets take more energy to transmit

  4. Possible Solutions • “Always On” assumption • Consider alternative paradigm for sleeping nodes • End-node polling vs. sending events/messages as they happen? • Gateways/Routers proxy for nodes that sleep (Proxy ND, etc.) • High cost to rejoin network • Goal is to determine that a mobile node has not moved to another network • Why isn’t detection of the same layer 2 network good enough? • Same SSID, L2 security credentials work, etc. • Verbose Protocols • Minimize round trips and required messages • Consider compressed or succinct message formats • COAP, XML compression, etc. • Use UDP with one-way messages when appropriate

  5. Which Protocols? • At minimum, Internet Protocol (IPv4 & v6) should continue to work on these nodes • IPv4 & ARP work (minus some optional add-ons) • IPv6 has challenges, especially in ND • Essentially, many optional add-ons in IPv4 are now required in all IPv6 implementations • Address autoconfiguration, DNA, IGMP/Multicast, DAD, etc. • Device-to-device, configuration, management, service discovery • DNS, DHCP, SNMP, NETCONF, DNS-SD, SDP, etc. • Some applications assume a human at both ends, and won’t be used on sleeping devices • Instant messaging, voice, multimedia, etc. • But, are we sure? (consider HTML & Jabber)

  6. Wider Applicability • Described as problem for low-cost, battery-powered, wireless sensors and actuators, but principals may apply to other nodes • Could extend laptop, touch pad or cell phone battery life • Could reduce energy consumption of wall-powered nodes Just because the energy is available, doesn’t mean we should squander it!

More Related