140 likes | 301 Views
Low metallicity and ultra-luminous X-ray sources in the Cartwheel galaxy. M. Mapelli, M. Colpi, L. Zampieri. Abstract. Low-metallicity massive stars: maybe directly collapsing into massive BHs In Cartwheel galaxy, >10 5 massive BHs generated via this mechanism probably.
E N D
Low metallicity and ultra-luminous X-ray sources in the Cartwheel galaxy M. Mapelli, M. Colpi, L. Zampieri
Abstract • Low-metallicity massive stars: maybe directly collapsing into massive BHs • In Cartwheel galaxy, >105 massive BHs generated via this mechanism probably. • Such BHs might power most of the ULXs • A possible anti-correlation between the ULX number and metallicity • Data not sufficient to draw further conclusions
ULXs • Characteristic • Point-like sources with isotropic X-ray luminosity Lx>1039 erg s-1: higher than the Eddington luminosity for ~ 7 Msun BH • Most of the brightest ULXs located in the starburst galaxies
ULXs • The origin of ULXs: still an open question • Could be associated with HMXBs powered by stellar BHs • With anisotropic X-ray emission • With super-Eddington accretion rate / luminosity • With a combination of the two mechanisms • Could be associated with HMXBs powered by IMBHs • Larger than 100 Msun not needed for most of ULXs • Required only to explain the properties of some peculiar ULXs, such as • The brightest ULXs (< 4 ULXs with Lx>1041 erg s-1) • Those which show quasi-periodic oscillations • Which are surrounded by isotropically ionized nebula and a collisional ring galaxy
Cartwheel Galaxy • IMBHs hardly account for all the ULXs observed in the Cartwheel galaxy • >1000 IMBHs needed to produce the 17 observed ULXs • Hard to produce such high number of IMBHs according to the most common theoretical models, such as • The runaway collapse in young stellar clusters • The repeated mergers of stellar-mass BHs in the star clusters • The remnants of population III stars
Model • Low-metallicity massive stars might directly collapse into massive BHs: the total number of massive BHs • A: the normalization constant • The total mass of massive BHs
Model • The upper limit of the fraction of massive BHs which power ULXs in a given galaxy at present • The fraction of massive BHs which are expected to power ULXs at present fMT~ 0.03 a fraction of the life of the cluster fduty~ 10-2 the fraction of time which a transient source spends its burst phase
Results For The Cartwheel • These numbers quite higher than those predicted by the runaway collapse • More than one massive BH may form in the same cluster and massive BHs can form also outside clusters
Comparison With Other Galaxies • AM 0644-741: the metallicity measurement comes from the bulge (dominated by old stars, while no measurements for the star forming outer ring) • NGC 4485/4490: the value of Z likely an upper limit (the method does not work for metallicities Z<0.4) • NGC 4559: undergone a strong burst of SF and hard to find HII regions • In ring galaxies or in interacting galaxies: relatively easy to find regions where the SF just started
Comparison With Other Galaxies • A possible anti-correlation between the number and the metallicity • A linear relation between the number and the SFR
Conclusions • Low-metallicity massive stars might end their life by collapsing into massive BHs • Such massive BHs may power most of the observed ULXs in the low-metallicity galaxy • An anti-correlation between the number of ULXs and metallicity of the host galaxy may exist
Open Questions and Uncertainties • The final stellar masses reported by M92 are still debated • The models considered in M92 and in Fryer neglect some important effects, such as: • Rotation • The possible binarity of the progenitor • The model does not include the possibility of pair instability supernovae • The lact, paucity or uncertainty in the metallicity measurements make hard to test this model