1 / 14

Chapter 3: How Can I Know What is Right?

Chapter 3: How Can I Know What is Right?. Introduction. Ethical skeptics – doubt whether there is such a thing as moral truth Ethical relativists – deny that there are any universally valid moral principles Ethical absolutists – claim there are moral absolutes

etana
Download Presentation

Chapter 3: How Can I Know What is Right?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 3: How Can I Know What is Right?

  2. Introduction • Ethical skeptics – doubt whether there is such a thing as moral truth • Ethical relativists – deny that there are any universally valid moral principles • Ethical absolutists – claim there are moral absolutes • Teleological ethical theories – consequences determine the rightness of an action • Deontological ethical theories– advocate doing what is good regardless of the consequences

  3. Kant and the Categorical Imperative • Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804) • Published The Critique of Pure Reason, which revolutionized western philosophy

  4. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of MoralsImmanuel Kant • Good will is the only thing that can be conceived as good without qualification • Action of duty has moral worth not in the purpose to be attained, but by the principle of volition irrespective of desire • Duty is the necessity to act out of reverence for the law

  5. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of MoralsImmanuel Kant • The Categorical Imperative • “I ought never to act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law.”

  6. Utilitarianism • Jeremy Bentham (1748 – 1832) proposed the ethical theory of utilitarianism • Utilitariansim – teleological theory that what makes an action right are its consequences • John Stuart Mill (1806 – 1873)- “The greatest happiness for the greatest number” • Hedonism – the highest good is pleasure

  7. What Utilitarianism IsJohn Stuart Mill • Actions are right in proportion to their promotion of happiness and wrong as they tend to produce pain • The ultimate sanction of utility is subjective– the conscientious feeling of the mind • Evidence that something is desirable is that people desire it

  8. Revaluation of Values • Some relate associate morality with religion • Ethical nihilism – idea that there is no answer to what is right • Ethical emotivism – claim that moral judgments express the appraiser’s attitudes of approval or disapproval • Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 – 1900) believed that religion and human reason had failed to answer what is right

  9. Beyond Good and EvilFriedrich Nietzsche • Criticizes past attempts to understand morality • Criticizes morality as defined by classes in the social system

  10. On the Genealogy of MoralityFriedrich Nietzsche • “Good” was not originally “unegoistic actions”, but distinction of the noble class as opposed to those who are common, vulgar, or “bad” • Slave revolt in morality • Inversion of the aristocratic value equation by the Jews • Ressentiment – recover losses through imaginary revenge • The good is those who are powerless, sick, poor, etc. • ?????????????????????????

  11. The Ethic of Care • Carol Gilligan proposed that there is a distinction between male and female concepts of morality • While men emphasize reciprocity in relationships, women emphasize response, such as care, love, and trust, etc.

  12. CaringNel Noddings • Natural and ethical caring • “I must” and “I want” • Obligation • Moral imperative • Dependent upon relationship • Right and Wrong • Problem of Justification • Women and Morality: Virtue

  13. Moral Relativism • Is there a balance between a moral relativism that holds all human actions as equal in moral worth and a moral universalism or absolutism that holds to one set of moral values? • David Wong attempts to find this middle ground

  14. RelativismDavid Wong • Meta-Ethical Relativism – the doctrine of relativity of moral truth and justifiability • Normative Relativism – one should never pass judgment on others with different values or try to conform them to one’s own • Wong proposes a middle ground of • not holding to one single morality without denying that some moralities might be false or inadequate • Allowing to pass judgment on significantly different values

More Related