1 / 15

Task B-5: Lunar Control Network Improvement

Task B-5: Lunar Control Network Improvement. USGS Astrogeology Team Brent Archinal Mark Rosiek Flagstaff AZ 26 August 2004. Overview. Currently TWO Lunar control networks RAND Unified Lunar Control Network RAND Clementine Lunar Control Network

ethan-young
Download Presentation

Task B-5: Lunar Control Network Improvement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Task B-5:Lunar Control Network Improvement USGS Astrogeology Team Brent Archinal Mark Rosiek Flagstaff AZ 26 August 2004

  2. Overview • Currently TWO Lunar control networks • RAND Unified Lunar Control Network • RAND Clementine Lunar Control Network • Large (several km) distortions likely in Clementine network • This Task is supporting an improved Lunar network

  3. Existing Lunar Control Networks • Unified Lunar Control Network (Davies, et al. 1994, JGR) • Sources: telescopic, Apollo, Mariner 10, Galileo • 1,478 points, including their radii • 1,286 points near side and 192 points far side • Ad hoc combination of separate control solutions • Clementine Network (Davies and Colvin, 1997, unpublished) • Tied at 22 points to ULCN, R=1736.7 km • 543,245 measures of 271,634 points on 43,871 images • Global coverage • Basis of USGS Clementine Digital Mosaics • Largest photogrammetric planetary control solution

  4. ULCN Points and Tie Points to Clementine Network Orange – ULC points Red – 22 ULC/Clementine points

  5. Clementine NetworkAccuracy in Doubt • Questions have been raised about quality/accuracy of Clementine lunar network and mosaics • Clementine H.R. Mosaicking, Malin and Ravine, 1998 (13 km offsets) • Work by Tony Cook, Mark Robinson, et al., 2002 March and later • Cook, et al., 2002 Fall AGU paper, “Preliminary Analysis of the Absolute Cartographic Accuracy of the Clementine UVVIS Mosaic” • PG&G Cartography Panel discussions (2002, 2003) • Accurate coordinates important forcoregistration ofall lunar image products

  6. FY04 Work at USGS Improving the Clementine network accuracy: - Compare to ULCN (done); readjust with additional tie points to ULCN (working) - Readjust, with camera angles reasonably constrained to a priori values (initial results) - Use realistic lunar radii (from Clementine lidar and polar stereo) as constraints, where possible (initial results) - Final solution incorporating best of above (angles and radii at present; will add ULCN)

  7. Differences between RAND ULCN and Clementine Networks [Plot from Mark to be inserted here today.] Uses 2,961 new measures of 1,387 ULCN points (of 1,478 points maximum)

  8. Camera angles reasonably constrained to a priori values Change in bore sight for 43,857 images Constrained 0.03°

  9. Camera angles reasonably constrained to a priori values Close up below and Global to right => Change in bore sight for 43,857 images

  10. Radii and camera angles reasonablyconstrained to a priori values Initial topographic surface

  11. Radii and camera angles reasonablyconstrained to a priori values Radii of 271,592 points after solution

  12. Radii and camera angles reasonablyconstrained to a priori values Mean = 15 m St Dev = 314 m MAD = 196 m Change in Radii of 271,592 points after solution Constrained 1,000 m

  13. Expected FY 04 Results • Global maps of possible error in original solution based on comparing original vs. new Clementine solutions • Vector field showing how any area of Clementine mosaics have been displaced from correct position • Corrected pointing for individual images • Assistance in evaluating accuracy of Lunar Orbiter control network now being worked on • If desired could remake Clementine (and planned Lunar Orbiter) mosaics with better accuracy, better consistency with ULCN (if not “truth”) • Document Clementine network and results in a paper • Improvement or densification of global topography

  14. Proposed FY 05 Work • Directly incorporate available Mariner 10 and Galileo measures into the Lunar network (rather than by intermediate use of ULCN) • Incorporate the USGS Lunar Orbiter Control Network • Incorporate a limited set of DEM tiles derived from Clementine stereo by A. Cook and colleagues (Cook and others, 2000), in order to see if this results in improved horizontal and vertical control in the areas of the tiles • Any resulting improvement in the lunar control network would be described and the relevant files posted to our USGS planetary control network web site • http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/Projects/ControlNetworks/Moon/ • The results of any positional improvements to the DEM tiles would be described and posted to Cooks’ and/or the USGS website

  15. Future Work • Measure and incorporate Apollo landing site points from Davies and Colvin [JGR, 2000] • Incorporate the global set of DEM tiles derived from Clementine stereo by A. Cook and colleagues • Remake Clementine and Lunar Orbiter mosaics • Pilot studies: • Evaluate use of radar data • Consider use of other data, e.g. stellar occultation; Apollo, telescopic, and high-res Lunar Orbiter images • Incorporate results from new missions

More Related