1 / 24

Principle investigator: Dato ’ Dr. Hajah Marlia Mohammed Salleh Co-investigators:

HEALTH SCREENING STUDY AMONG HOSPITAL STAFF. Principle investigator: Dato ’ Dr. Hajah Marlia Mohammed Salleh Co-investigators: Dr. Thillainathan Dr. Ng Kok Huan Presenter: YANTIE SHAHIDA BT ABDUL MANAN Pegawai Pendidikan Kesihatan Jabatan Kesihatan Negeri Pahang.

ethan
Download Presentation

Principle investigator: Dato ’ Dr. Hajah Marlia Mohammed Salleh Co-investigators:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HEALTH SCREENING STUDY AMONG HOSPITAL STAFF Principle investigator: Dato’ Dr. HajahMarlia Mohammed Salleh Co-investigators: Dr. Thillainathan Dr. Ng KokHuan Presenter: YANTIE SHAHIDA BT ABDUL MANAN PegawaiPendidikanKesihatan JabatanKesihatanNegeri Pahang

  2. Health Screening i • We often assume that when a person is not sick - he or she must be in good health, but this is not always the case. • The root of many common diseases such as HPT, DM, MI and cancer often set in years before the illness actually surfaces. • Therefore, early detection of risk factors is essential (Patel et al. 2011).

  3. Health Screening ii • As it not only improves chances of successfully treating early stages of medical conditions but also of preventing or delaying disease, thus maintaining a high quality of life and prolonged life expectancy. • CVD is one of the most prevalent and devastating health problems in the world and is responsible for approximately 30% of deaths worldwide (WHO, 2005) which equate to about 16.6 million deaths. (Erhardt, Moller & Puig, 2007). • Our study emphasized on coronary risk.

  4. Objectives • General To investigate the health status of the staff • Specific Screening on => Obesity => BMI => MI risk => Procam => Lifestyle factors

  5. Study Design & Sample Selection • Cross-sectional study • All hospital staff with age ≥ 40 years old • Duration: 3 months • Study centre: HTAA • Participants were asked to fast for at least 8 hours before the study begun

  6. Instrument Personal Particulars Family Medical history Health status screening questionnaire Personal Life style Habits Basic health screening PROCAM Screening Biometry measurements

  7. Statistical Analysis • SPSS 17.0 for Windows was utilized. • Patients’ socio-demographic data was descriptively presented as frequencies and percentages. • Procam calculator was used to determine the risk of MI.

  8. Procedure • Briefing. • Agreement of participation. • On the day of participation eligible participants were asked to • complete the instruments- BSSK/W/I/2008 • biometry assessment • Blood pressure (Bp) • Waist circumference (WC) • Weight and height • Blood test => glucose, lipid profile

  9. Results: Demography • A total of 398 participants were recruited • only 353 included in the analysis • 97 male and 256 female • The average mean age for male participants was 48.59 • and female was 47.82 years

  10. Life Style i Healthy

  11. Life Style ii Healthy

  12. Life Style iii Healthy Calculation of marks for life style health score: Yes = 5 mark No = 0 mark E.g- Scores for depression (yes, no) Sum of depression symptoms 1 + 2 / Total scores x 100 = 5 + 0 / 10 x 100 = 50% of risk of unhealthy life style

  13. Life Style iii Score interpretation - 0- <50 – Healthy - >50 -100 – Unhealthy lifestyle

  14. Procami • The PROCAM Quick Check: • allows rapid initial assessment of coronary risk. • suitable for men and women aged 20-75 years. • provides an estimation of risk sufficiently accurate to determine if further examination by a physician is advisable. • The PROCAM Risk Scores? • It was developed based on 450 coronary events occurring in a cohort of about 5,000 men aged 35-65 years at recruitment and with at least 10 years of unbroken follow-up. • Generally two type => PROCAM Quick Check and the PROCAM Health Check. Empana et al. 2003

  15. Procam ii Assessment • Age • Gender • Glucose • Smoking • Anamnenies (Family medical history) • Blood pressure • Weight • Hypertension history Website: http://www.chd-taskforce.com/procam_interactive.html

  16. Risk Factors: MI n = 32 (12.5%) Ranging from 1 - 6.22 fold increased risk compared to risk of average person with same age n = 20 (20.6%) Ranging from 1 – 3.08 fold increased risk compared to risk of average person with same age n =18 (18.5%) The risk is lower than risk of average person with same age Normal reading: BMI <25; WC<90 (M) <80 (F); BP<100

  17. Discussion & Conclusion i • Female tend to possess better life style scores than male in terms of all lifestyle scores • Eating habits • Usage of substances • Physical activities • Majority of the staff were with healthy lifestyle => lifestyle score (mean scores> 75.5). • Procam results showed that the staff were at risk of CORONARY diseases particularly MI.

  18. Discussion & Conclusion ii Limitation: • The instruments used was not tested on its psychometric. • Since the results was based on a sample of hospital staff therefore, we can’t generalize the results to other cohorts. • Suggestion: • Future studies should also involved psychometric evaluation and quality of life assessments. • For intervention study with longitudinal designed should be implemented.

  19. the screening was strongly supported by hospital director

  20. The staffs concentrated filling in bssk/w/i/2008 form

  21. Too scared! But it’s a must for age > 40 years

  22. Screening! Screening! Health screening!

  23. References Patel, J. V., Gill, P. S., Chackathayil, J., Ojukwu, H., Stemman, P., et al. 2011. Short-Term Effects of Screening for Cardiovascular Risk in the Deaf Community: A Pilot Study. Cardiology Research and Practice. 10.4061/2011/493546 WHO. World Health Organization. 2005. Cardiovascular disease: Prevention and control. Geneva. Empanaa, J.P., Ducimetie`reb, P., Arveilerc, D., Ferrie`resd, J., Evanse, A., et al. 2003. Are the Framingham and PROCAM coronary heart disease risk functions applicable to different European populations? European Heart Journal 24, 1903–1911. International task force for prevention of coronary disease. 2010. http://www.chd-taskforce.com/procam_interactive.html Erhardt, L., Moller, R. & Puig, J.G. 2007. Comprehensive cardiovascular risk management – what does it mean in practice? 3(5): 587–603.

  24. Thank you

More Related