1 / 18

Parametric versus Nonparametric Statistics – When to use them and which is more powerful?

Parametric versus Nonparametric Statistics – When to use them and which is more powerful?. Angela Hebel Department of Natural Sciences University of Maryland Eastern Shore April 5, 2002. Parametric Assumptions. The observations must be independent

ethel
Download Presentation

Parametric versus Nonparametric Statistics – When to use them and which is more powerful?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Parametric versus Nonparametric Statistics – When to use them and which is more powerful? Angela Hebel Department of Natural Sciences University of Maryland Eastern Shore April 5, 2002

  2. Parametric Assumptions • The observations must be independent • The observations must be drawn from normally distributed populations • These populations must have the same variances • The means of these normal and homoscedastic populations must be linear combinations of effects due to columns and/or rows*

  3. Nonparametric Assumptions • Observations are independent • Variable under study has underlying continuity

  4. Measurement • What are the 4 levels of measurement discussed in Siegel’s chapter? 1. Nominal or Classificatory Scale • Gender, ethnic background 2. Ordinal or Ranking Scale • Hardness of rocks, beauty, military ranks 3. Interval Scale • Celsius or Fahrenheit 4. Ratio Scale • Kelvin temperature, speed, height, mass or weight

  5. Nonparametric Methods • There is at least one nonparametric test equivalent to a parametric test • These tests fall into several categories • Tests of differences between groups (independent samples) • Tests of differences between variables (dependent samples) • Tests of relationships between variables

  6. Differences between independent groups • Two samples – compare mean value for some variable of interest

  7. Mann-Whitney U Test • Nonparametric alternative to two-sample t-test • Actual measurements not used – ranks of the measurements used • Data can be ranked from highest to lowest or lowest to highest values • Calculate Mann-Whitney U statistic U = n1n2 + n1(n1+1) – R1 2

  8. Example of Mann-Whitney U test • Two tailed null hypothesis that there is no difference between the heights of male and female students • Ho: Male and female students are the same height • HA: Male and female students are not the same height

  9. U = n1n2 + n1(n1+1) – R1 • 2 • U=(7)(5) + (7)(8) – 30 • 2 • U = 35 + 28 – 30 • U = 33 • U’ = n1n2 – U • U’ = (7)(5) – 33 • U’ = 2 • U 0.05(2),7,5 = U 0.05(2),5,7 = 30 • As 33 > 30, Ho is rejected Zar, 1996

  10. Differences between independent groups • Multiple groups

  11. Differences between dependent groups • Compare two variables measured in the same sample • If more than two variables are measured in same sample

  12. Relationships between variables • Two variables of interest are categorical

  13. Level of Measurement Sample Characteristics Correlation 1 Sample 2 Sample K Sample (i.e., >2) Independent Dependent Independent Dependent Categorical or Nominal Χ2 or bi-nomial Χ2 Macnarmar’s Χ2 Χ2 Cochran’s Q Rank or Ordinal Mann Whitney U Wilcoxin Matched Pairs Signed Ranks Kruskal Wallis H Friendman’s ANOVA Spearman’s rho Parametric (Interval & Ratio) z test or t test t test between groups t test within groups 1 way ANOVA between groups 1 way ANOVA (within or repeated measure) Pearson’s r Factorial (2 way) ANOVA Summary Table of Statistical Tests (Plonskey, 2001)

  14. Advantages of Nonparametric Tests • Probability statements obtained from most nonparametric statistics are exact probabilities, regardless of the shape of the population distribution from which the random sample was drawn • If sample sizes as small as N=6 are used, there is no alternative to using a nonparametric test Siegel, 1956

  15. Advantages of Nonparametric Tests • Treat samples made up of observations from several different populations. • Can treat data which are inherently in ranks as well as data whose seemingly numerical scores have the strength in ranks • They are available to treat data which are classificatory • Easier to learn and apply than parametric tests Siegel, 1956

  16. Criticisms of Nonparametric Procedures • Losing precision/wasteful of data • Low power • False sense of security • Lack of software • Testing distributions only • Higher-ordered interactions not dealt with

  17. Power of a Test • Statistical power – probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is in fact false and should be rejected • Power of parametric tests – calculated from formula, tables, and graphs based on their underlying distribution • Power of nonparametric tests – less straightforward; calculated using Monte Carlo simulation methods (Mumby, 2002)

  18. Questions?

More Related