470 likes | 479 Views
This survey compares statistically significant gender differences in the UTEP faculty climate survey between 2004 and 2007, highlighting improvements in gender diversity and satisfaction with working conditions.
E N D
NSF ADVANCE: Institutional Transformation for Faculty Diversity ADVANCE Faculty Work Life Survey: Comparison of Statistically Significant Gender Differences Between 2004 and 2007 August 1, 2008 Igor Ryabov Ann Darnell
Overview • Survey monitors changes in institutional climate since the beginning of the ADVANCE initiative • Differences are documented across gender, ethnicity, position and discipline in http://www.advance.utep.edu • Modeled after the ADVANCE climate survey at the University of Wisconsin-Madison
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Biological Sciences Chemistry Computer Science Geological Sciences Mathematical Sciences Physics Civil Engineering Electrical & Computer Eng. Mechanical & Industrial Eng. Metallurgical & Material Eng. Social and Behavioral Sciences (S & BS) Communication Economics & Finance Information & Decision Sciences Languages & Linguistics Marketing & Management Political Science Psychology Sociology & Anthropology Targeted Population
Areas Addressed • Basic Demographic • Hiring Process • Resources • Interactions With Colleagues And Others • Departmental Decision-Making Process • Perceptions of Gender Diversity • Tenure Process • Satisfaction with UTEP
Survey Administration Method • Wave 1 was administered in Spring 2004 as a paper survey in booklet format • Wave 2 was administered in Fall 2007 and was entirely web-based
Results • This presentation shows the statistically significant differences in responses on climate issues across gender only • “Not Applicable” responses and cases with missing values were excluded from the analyses • Full report available at http://www.advance.utep.edu/wlsurvey
Perceptions of Gender Diversity - Department, College, University* * Respondents were asked three series of identical questions to address gender diversity in their department, their college and the overall university level
Conclusion • Among UTEP faculty, gender differences in assessment of the key climate components pronounced in 2004 have become negligible in 2007 • The UTEP faculty, regardless of gender, became more appreciative of gender diversity at all levels • The satisfaction with hiring, tenure and decision-making processes at the department level increased for both sexes, but more so for women • The climate areas that need further improvement are resource allocation and departmental decision-making • The overall results show continuous improvement in institutional climate at UTEP and increased satisfaction with working conditions