270 likes | 411 Views
GAFSP/NAFSP &Nepal: An Interventionist FOs/CSOs Concerns. A Presentation at GAFSP-KM Workshop By NAFSP/ FOs Co- Ordinator Prof Keshab Khadka , Ph D CCM & Head, Research Department, All Nepal Peasants’ Federation
E N D
GAFSP/NAFSP &Nepal: An Interventionist FOs/CSOs Concerns A Presentation at GAFSP-KM Workshop ByNAFSP/ FOs Co-Ordinator Prof KeshabKhadka, Ph D CCM & Head, Research Department, All Nepal Peasants’ Federation Organised by AFA/Agricord/AsiaDHRRA/CSA,Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 8-11 Nov 2012
GAFSP Includes Nepal • Govt of Nepal(GoN) eligibility to GAFSP informed: Jun 2010 • CIP and national priority pre-conditionalities • Central authorities consortium: Aug 2010 • GoN Proposal to GAFSP Secretariat Sept 2010 • Original Scheme of US $65.5 Million on Food and Nutrition package program • GoN informed of proposal selected at reduced scale of $46.5 M grant and $11.5M in-fund
FOs/CSOs and GAFSP • Till Revised version, no leakage to FOs/CSOs • Thanks to AFA that FOs/CSOs got GAFSP informed and ANPfa/ WOCAN jointly hold civil society interaction program on 10 July 2011 • AFA, specially Esther, second visit on Aug 2011 and discussions at various level • National Peasant's Coalition meet and Esther's presentation on GAFSP at ANPFa Secretariat • Interactions with GoN, FAO TA & World Bank • Intervention begins: GoN & WB team, sour face
FOs/CSOs Position • Many a good projects failed as grass-root people ignored as farmers traditionally a silent majority • Farmers, the ultimate project implementer, be at centre of this GAFSP, renamed NAFSP • Diverse Ecology needs Bio-diversity based agri- production enhancement project: humid to arid crops pattern, added community culture • Small and marginal peasants, IPs, Women, Dalits, Landless farmer & farm labour focus • Poor infrastructure/ poor access to market/Dalit-based agri-labour feminization of agriculture • Farmer first with right based CSO scrutiny
FO/CSO face GoN: Dhulikhel fight • GoN/MoAC presented Four Components • Technology Development and Adaption • Technology Dissemination and Adoption • Livelihood Enhancement • Nutritional Status Enhancement FOs/CSOs accepted caption but thorough revision of content subject to stakeholders' concerns Project site 19 Districts of Mid/Far west Mountain & Hills welcomed but focus on 7 Dist be to 8 Dist Talk with Secretary/ MoAC for mutual move agreed
Consulting stakeholder – the Challenge • Approaches to fund raising for Surkhet stakeholders' consultative conference • WB 17 Feb follow up visit & sharp criticism • Thanks to Soc & his follow up visit that finalised small fund: AFA/AsiaDHRRA co-op • Big Bang Surkhet event Jun 15-17 Consultative Conference, a farmers' strength show off
Surkhet War – Victory of FOs/CSOs Hundred s attend; Thousands speak • All key FOs and NGOs working on food security, peasants right and natural resource management • FOs who are part of the Peasants' Coalition (Part of IFAD MTCP) including Water & Forest Users • Public officials of concerned Ministry and Offices • Farmers and Peasants of the project area of GAFSP /NAFSP focusing on hard-hit 8 districts • Other stakeholders: Feminization & Gender Justice, Dalits and IPs, Lagged behind social groups HR activists & Media people, Lawyers & ProfsWFP
The output – Revised Components • 3FOs+2CSOs out of 17 member NSC • NPC at Regional, District and VDC body • Program Designing, M&E, local leadership • Still Challenging FO Front but warm relations • Food Sovereignty,-the guiding principle REVISIONS: • Emphasis on local seed & breed • Sustainable Natural Farming + Zero budget crops • Bio-diversity based local technology promotion • Socio- cultural, gender & IPs, Local people centre
The Progress So Far • July Review of WB & FAO: mutually respectful • Final Appraisal Mission Sept 7-17 and FOs: Emphasis on result-oriented implementation • Esther reporting: WB tabled final proposal at GAFSP Secretariat and remarks on 23rd Oct • GoN ready to implement by Jan' 2013 • Phone talk on 5th Nov 2012 with Secretary, MoAC/N and others: a happy going
Lesson Learned • Historical Peoples' Movement II of 2004 & common agenda: Food Sovereignty • FOs common platform in MTCP/IFAD: NPC and GAFSP and ADS interventions • It's FOs encounter with GAFSP, rather than involvement, FOs/CSOs fought own • Different Farmers' and Peasants Organisations at National Table and alliance building • Common understanding among FOs vital for strong position assertion
The Analysis • No opposition after involvement but neither submission: constructive criticism, grass-root based fact forces bureaucracy to go along • Accountability, transparency and mutual confidence building bring farmers together • Less politicisation but much policy intervention earns mass support • Thanks to GAFSP: Farmers learn Governance