170 likes | 188 Views
This research explores the geochemistry of TTG plutons and how the melting conditions of amphibolites affect the major and trace elements composition of TTG liquids. The study also discusses the identification of low and high-pressure TTGs and the challenges in studying complex, multiply injected, and molten tectonic assemblages.
E N D
Using trace elements to define the PT conditions of TTG genesis. Jean-François Moyen Gary Stevens University of Stellenbosch South Africa
Key ideas • At least part of the geochemistry of TTG plutons can be interpreted as reflecting melting conditions • P-T conditions of amphibolites melting exert a strong control on the major and trace elements composition of TTG liquids • “True” TTG signature requires high pressure (15-20 kbar) • However, both low and high pressure TTGs can be identified 1 If there is fractionnation, the same logics could also apply using the most primitive liquid – it requires a little more work to determine its composition
TTG are... • Orthogneisses • Tonalites, Trondhjemites & Granodiorites (Na-rich series) • Fractionnated REE, high La/Yb and Sr/Y, etc. • Largely homogeneous throughout the Archaean
TTG “gneisses” or “plutons” ? It is difficult to constrain good petrogenetical studies on complex, multiply injected and molten, possibly tectonic assemblages! Sand River Gneisses Ca. 3.1 Ga TTG gneisses in Messina area, Limpopo Belt, South Africa Stolzburg pluton (Barberton, South Africa -- 3.45 Ga)
Gt-in Melting of hydrous basalt In Garnet stability field (Gt in residue) Gt-in Conditions for making TTGs Little or no direct tectonic meaning!
Using published experimental data • Review and compilation of published data on experimental melting ( > 320 runs described in 15-20 studies) • Building of a global model for amphibolite melting • Implications for trace element contents (Moyen & Stevens, AGU monographs 164 pp.149-175)
C0 Cl = F + D (1 - F) Compilation of experimental data Interpolated “maps” of modal composition “Maps” of trace elements composition
Sr/Y NB- 1.Similar maps can be established for all elements or ratios, e.g. La/Yb 2. Actually different models were built for dirrerent types of amphibolites
TTG composition as a depth indicator Sr contents Nb-Ta anomaly and Nb/Ta Y & HREE depletion
Eu anomaly HREE depletion
900-1000 °C = trondhjemite and tonalite composition • 15-20 kbar = proper trace elements signature • Typical geotherm 15-20 °C/km (Comparable to Barberton HP amphibolites)
Kenogamissi (2.74-2.71 Ga) Stolzburg (3.44 Ga) Theespruit (3.44 Ga) Steynsdorp (3.56 Ga) TTGs and TTGs?
Kenogamissi (2.74-2.71 Ga) Stolzburg (3.44 Ga) Theespruit (3.44 Ga) Steynsdorp (3.56 Ga)
Lower Y Yb Higher Sr/Y La/Yb Etc. Tdj. Subduction Low Y Yb etc. trondhjemites Ton. Dio. Intraplate (plume/orogenic collapse/etc.) (relatively) high Y Yb etc. tonalites - diorites Grd.
Key ideas • At least part of the geochemistry of TTG plutons can be interpreted as reflecting melting conditions • P-T conditions of amphibolites melting exert a strong control on the major and trace elements composition of TTG liquids • “True” TTG signature requires high pressure (15-20 kbar) • However, both low and high pressure TTGs can be identified 1 If there is fractionnation, the same logics could also apply using the most primitive liquid – it requires a little more work to determine its composition