40 likes | 226 Views
D ( DD). T1. C. C offers D as evidence in support of T1. D invites the inference that T1 is true D supports the inference that T1 is true D implies that T1 is true If D is observed, T1 must be true. Induction, Deduction, Abduction. Pure cases and process pure.
E N D
D(DD) T1 C C offers D as evidence in support of T1
D invites the inference that T1 is true • D supports the inference that T1 is true • D implies that T1 is true • If D is observed, T1 must be true Induction, Deduction, Abduction
Pure cases and process pure. • Any two different tasks will eventually yield a dissociation. • It is fallacious to conclude that since double dissociations exist, modules must also exist. D & K claim that… ?
Reading aloud: Single-route model? • Surface Dyslexia (Exception Words) Vs. Phonological Dyslexia (Nonwords) • DD used to reject one model and support another Typical use of DD (Plaut et al., 1996): חזרה לראשי