170 likes | 321 Views
JUDICATA. Deep Data: Mapping the Legal Genome. COMMON LAW. Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969) New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981) Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009). DEEP DATA. Three metallurgic morals. GOLD. Sit down and make gold data. LEAD.
E N D
JUDICATA • Deep Data: Mapping the Legal Genome
COMMON LAW • Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969) • New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981) • Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009)
DEEP DATA • Three metallurgic morals
GOLD • Sit down and make gold data.
LEAD • It may take a lot of lead bullets…
APPROACH • Start with rule-based approaches • Reviewable, not black boxes • …but don’t completely ignore AI, of course
SILVER • …but it can pay dividends and lead to a silver bullet.
“With respect to the pervasiveness of harassment, courts have held an employee generally cannot recover for harassment that is occasional, isolated, sporadic, or trivial; rather, the employee must show a concerted pattern of harassment of a repeated, routine, or a generalized nature.”
STRUCTURE • As much as possible algorithmically • Acknowledge that code can’t do it all • 2/3 Engineers, 1/3 Legal
RESOURCES • A Jailhouse Lawyer’s Manual • The Oyez Project
JUDICATA • Adam Hahn • adam@judicata.com