130 likes | 239 Views
Planning for Fiscal Sustainability in Difficult Times February 19, 2009. Presented by Jesse Takahashi Finance Director City of Campbell. Background. Built-out city of 40,000, in suburban San Jose/Silicon Valley 4 years of deficits consumed $5.7 million in reserves
E N D
Planning for Fiscal Sustainability in Difficult TimesFebruary 19, 2009 Presented by Jesse Takahashi Finance Director City of Campbell
Background • Built-out city of 40,000, in suburban San Jose/Silicon Valley • 4 years of deficits consumed $5.7 million in reserves • $4 million in cuts made over 5 years resulted in balanced budget in FY 07 and FY 08 • Further decline in economy, continued State revenue take-away, and new fire contract rekindled structural deficit
Timeline of Events • March2007--study session began focused discussion of voter required revenue enhancement options • July 2007--community satisfaction survey; included two possible revenue measures • October 2007--study session reviewed unmet operating and capital needs, survey results and revenue options; direction to pursue measure and hire consultant • January2008—Consultant begins planning process for possible measure • March2008—First directed polling to assess viability of measure; strong support but lack of knowledge over fiscal situation
Timeline of Events (cont) • April2008—launched community education & outreach program • July2008—conducted follow up community polling; narrowed scope of possible revenue measure • August2008—Council votes to place Transactions & Use Tax on ballot • Aug-Nov2008—Partisan campaign begins; City disseminates objective information • Nov2008—Voters pass measure with 71% approval; effective April 1, 2009
Outreach Efforts • Inventory of Community Organizations • Citizens Budget Task Force • Newsletter and Newspaper Articles • Citywide Mailing • Community Forums • Presentations to Community Groups • Information Tables at Public Events • Feedback Forms
Summary of Options • Raise revenue via a ballot measure to maintain current service levels • Reduce expenditures and/or raise fees by $2 million to eliminate deficit • Some combination of the above What level of service and quality of life do we want for our community ?
Recommendation • Maintain current services from a ¼ cent sales tax increase • Locally raised funds would stay local • 40+ cities have adopted such measures • A $50 pair of jeans or dress would cost an extra 13 cents; a $1,000 computer would cost an extra $2.50
Keys to Success • Self Assessment • Community Priorities • Unified Board or Council • Education and Outreach • It’s all About the Trust • Communicate, Communicate, Communicate • Assemble a Capable Team • Speak with One Voice
Obstacles to Success • Naysayers (Internal and External) • Limited Budget/Resources • Getting Your Ducks Lined up • Workers, Endorsements and partisan campaign volunteers • Poor Economy • Reasons for Distrust in Local Officials • Maintaining Momentum through Entire Process
Reasons for Optimism • Strike While Iron is Hot • New President has Created Renewed Hope and Optimism Among Public • Public is Fed up with State’s Inability to Balance Budget Without Impacting Local Governments • People Are More Aware and Involved in Their Local Communities More Than Ever • YOU CAN DO IT!!!
6 Steps for Success • Initiate Planning Efforts • Implement Public Opinion Research • Assess Initial Baseline Feasibility • Implement Nonpartisan Outreach Program • Re-Assess Support and Prepare your Council or Board • Win the Partisan Campaign
Resources • Consultants • League of California Cities • Institute for Local Government • California Ballot Measure Academy • CA Local Gov’t Finance Almanac (aka, Michael Coleman website) • www.californiacityfinance.com • CSMFO members and email listserve