290 likes | 418 Views
S a lton Sea Species Conservation Habitat Project Draft EIS/EIR. California Natural Resources Agency U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. What We Want to Accomplish Today. Review purpose and need for Species Conservation Habitat (SCH) Project Present alternatives evaluated in Draft EIS/EIR
E N D
Salton Sea Species Conservation Habitat ProjectDraft EIS/EIR California Natural Resources Agency U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
What We Want to Accomplish Today • Review purpose and need for Species Conservation Habitat (SCH) Project • Present alternatives evaluated in Draft EIS/EIR • Accept oral or written comments on Draft EIS/EIR • Describe what comes after public comment period
Need for SCH Project • Declining surface water elevation will lead to loss of shallow water habitat and increased salinity • Increasing salinity will lead to fishery collapse • Fishery collapse will result in loss of food for fish-eating birds (pelicans, cormorants) • SCH ponds would provide salinity controlled, replacement habitat
Authorization for SCH California Fish and Game Code § 2932(b) Implementation of conservation measures necessary to protect the fish and wildlife species dependent on the Salton Sea, including adaptive management measurements pursuant to Section 2081.7. These conservation measures shall be limited to the Salton Sea…
Purpose of EIS/EIR • Disclose to decision-makers and public • Significant environmental impacts • Reasonable alternatives to avoid/minimize impacts • Identify • Environmentally preferable / Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (NEPA) • Environmentally superior alternative (CEQA) • Preferred alternative • Solicit comments on project/impacts
Alternatives Development PrinciplesAlternatives Must… • Provide habitat ASAP • Have sufficient and reliable water supply • Manage salinity, sediment, and selenium • Be compatible with other projects • Geothermal • USFWS habitat development • Agriculture • Use cost-effective structures and operations • Be “doable” and “durable”
Alternatives Development Process Project Need / Legislation DFG/DWR Stakeholders Consultants Special Studies EIS/EIR Alternatives/Impact Analysis Preferred Alternative Project Design
Developing Project Alternatives • Stakeholder/special interest involvement • Shared information about SCH Project • Identified concerns or conflicts with other uses • Identified solutions and opportunities(cooperative efforts) • Special studies • Biological • Geotechnical • Engineering • Cost considerations
Results of Stakeholder Involvement • Refined project description • Modified project design at Alamo River • Added mosquito control measures to operations • Confirmed SCH project would not preclude geothermal development • Confirmed SCH project would complement planned development • USFWS habitat • Air quality management
Results of Special Studies • Developed specialized construction techniques for weak soils • Identified performance and tolerance ranges for tilapia species • Identified target pond salinities to achieve desired biological performance • Refined a range of operations to maximize potential for success
Cost Considerations • Combinations of New/ Alamo River sites eliminated • Sites configured to maximize benefit at lowest cost • Sites mostly on IID property • Design based on simple construction techniques • Maximized use of existing topography • Ponds located close to suitable water sources • Operational flexibility to optimize water quality conditions
Location and Configuration of Alternatives Alamo River sites New River sites
State’s Preferred SCH Alternative Alt. 3, New River/Pumped Diversion (3,770 acres)
Current Project Schedule • Draft NEPA/CEQA document – Summer 2011 • Draft permit applications – Fall 2011 • Final NEPA/CEQA document – Spring 2012 • Permits complete – Summer 2012 • Final design – Fall 2012 • Begin construction – Spring 2013 • Complete construction – Summer 2014
How to Submit Comments • At today’s meeting • Verbally • Written on comment form • Electronic comment • E-form provided on DWR Salton Sea website • Mail written comments
To Comment Today • Verbal comments • Give name and affiliation, if any • Speak clearly so concerns are understood • Be succinct so others have time to comment • Turn in comment form
To Comment after Today • Electronic comment form (preferred method) • www.water.ca.gov/saltonsea/ • In left margin, click on “DEIS/EIR Comment Form”
Written Comments • Ms. Lanika Cervantes, Corps Project ManagerU.S. Army Corps of EngineersLos Angeles District, Regulatory Division6010 Hidden Valley Road, Suite 105Carlsbad, CA 92011 • OR • Mr. David Elms, Deputy Regional ManagerCalifornia Department of Fish and Game 78078 Country Club Drive, Suite 109Bermuda Dunes, CA 92203
Guidance for Commenting • Focus on scope and content of EIS/EIR • Goals and objectives • Alternatives • Affected environment • Impact analysis • Be specific • Refer to sections and line numbers where appropriate
END Thank you for your interest. Please give us your comments.