1 / 10

Robert Cionni, MD

Robert Cionni, MD. Postoperative Refraction and Patient Satisfaction after Bilateral Implantation of Presbyopia -Correcting Intraocular Lenses.

evette
Download Presentation

Robert Cionni, MD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Robert Cionni, MD Postoperative Refraction and Patient Satisfaction after Bilateral Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Financial Disclosure: the author of this e-Poster is a Consultant to Alcon and has received research funding and presentation support from Alcon Research, Ltd.

  2. Purpose • To evaluate predictability of refractive outcomes and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses with aspheric apodized diffractive or aspheric and spherical accommodative optics.

  3. Methods • Cataract patients with <1 diopter of corneal astigmatism underwent on-label, bilateral implantation of: • ReSTOR IQ +3.0D add IOLs • Crystalens AO IOLs • Crystalens HD IOLs • Refractive enhancements were not permitted before study end • 6-month, prospective, randomized, subject-masked study • 3 month interim results are presented here • Study conducted at four-centers in the US

  4. Methods • Manifest refraction (MR) was measured preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 and 3 months • Patients self-rating of bilateral vision (without glasses) was evaluated using the Cataract TyPE questionnaire* • Rating scale of 0 to 10 (0=best, 10=worst) * Javitt J, Jacobson G, Schiffman R. Validity and reliability of the Cataract TyPE Spec: an instrument for measuring outcomes of cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:285-290

  5. Patient Demographics AGE Between-treatment p-value: p = 0.56 GENDER Between-treatment p-value: p = 0.82

  6. Mean Postop Refraction1-month visit Postoperative myopia observed among eyes implanted with Crystalens IOLs * *P<.0001; denotes statistically significant difference between IQ ReSTOR +3 IOL and Crystalens HD & AO IOLs.

  7. Mean Postop Refraction3-month visit Postoperative myopia observed among eyes implanted with Crystalens IOLs. * IQ *P<.0001; denotes statistically significant difference between IQ ReSTOR +3 IOL and Crystalens HD & AO IOLs.

  8. Predictability of Refractionwithin ±0.5 D * * N=76 N=55 N=53 N=59 N=61 N=74 *P=.02; IQ ReSTOR +3 IOL compared with Crystalens HD IOL

  9. Self-Rating of Uncorrected Vision Mean ratings were highest for the apodized diffractive IOL group (+3.0 D), followed by the aspheric (AO) and the spherical (HD) accommodating IOLS. Best * * Better Rating Worst *p< 0.001

  10. Conclusions • One and three months afterbilateral implantation of presbyopia-correcting IOLs, patients had: • more predictable refractive outcomes with aspheric apodized diffractive IOL than with the accommodative aspheric or accommodative spherical IOLs  • greater satisfaction with the aspheric apodized diffractive IOL than with the accommodative aspheric or the accommodative spherical IOLs 

More Related