450 likes | 478 Views
Preprocessing for EEG & MEG. Tom Schofield & Ed Roberts. Data acquisition. Data acquisition. Using Cogent to a generate marker pulse.. drawpict(2); outportb(888,2); tport=time; waituntil(tport+100); outportb(888,0);
E N D
Preprocessing for EEG & MEG Tom Schofield & Ed Roberts
Data acquisition Using Cogent to a generate marker pulse.. drawpict(2); outportb(888,2); tport=time; waituntil(tport+100); outportb(888,0); logstring( [‘displayed ‘O’ at time ' num2str(time) ]);
Two crucial steps • Activity caused by your stimulus (ERP) is ‘hidden’ within continuous EEG stream • ERP is your ‘signal’, all else in EEG is ‘noise’ • Event-related activity should not be random, we assume all else is • Epoching – cutting the data into chunks referenced to stimulus presentation • Averaging – calculating the mean value for each time-point across all epochs
Extracting ERP from EEG ERPs emerge from EEG as you average trials together
Overview • Preprocessing steps • Preprocessing with SPM • What to be careful about • What you need to know about filtering
Epoching - SPM Creates: e_mydata.mat
Downsampling • Nyquist Theory – minimum digital sampling frequency must be > twice the maximum frequency in analogue signal • Select ‘Downsample’ from the ‘Other’ menu
Downsample Creates: de_mydata.mat
Artefact rejection Blinks Eye-movements Muscle activity EKG Skin potentials Alpha waves
Artefact rejection Blinks Eye-movements Muscle activity EKG Skin potentials Alpha waves
Artefact rejection - SPM Creates: ade_mydata.mat
Artefact correction • Rejecting ‘artefact’ epochs costs you data • Using a simple artefact detection method will lead to a high level of false-positive artefact detection • Rejecting only trials in which artefact occurs might bias your data • High levels of artefact associated with some populations • Alternative methods of ‘Artefact Correction’ exist
Artefact correction - SPM • SPM uses a robust average procedure to weight each value according to how far away it is from the median value for that timepoint Weighting Value Outliers are given less weight Points close to median weighted ‘1’
Artefact correction - SPM • Normal average • Robust Weighted Average
Robust averaging - SPM Creates: ade_mydata.mat
Artefact Correction • ICA • Linear trend detection • Electro-oculogram • ‘No-stim’ trials to correct for overlapping waveforms
Artefact avoidance • Blinking • Avoid contact lenses • Build ‘blink breaks’ into your paradigm • If subject is blinking too much – tell them • EMG • Ask subjects to relax, shift position, open mouth slightly • Alpha waves • Ask subject to get a decent night’s sleep beforehand • Have more runs of shorter length – talk to subject in between • Jitter ISI – alpha waves can become entrained to stimulus
Averaging R = Noise on single trial N = Number of trials Noise in avg of N trials (1/√N) x R More trials = less noise Double S/N need 4 trials Quadruple need 16 trials
Averaging Creates: made_mydata.mat
Averaging • Assumes that only the EEG noise varies from trial to trial • But – amplitude will vary • But – latency will vary • Variable latency is usually a bigger problem than variable amplitude
Averaging: effects of variance Latency variation can be a significant problem
Latency variation solutions • Don’t use a peak amplitude measure
Other stuff you can do – all under ‘Other’ in GUI • Merge data sessions together • Calculate a ‘grand mean’ across subjects • Rereference to a different electrode • FILTER
Filtering Why would you want to filter?
Potential Artefacts • Before Averaging… • Remove non-neural voltages • Sweating, fidgeting • Patients, Children • Avoid saturating the amplifier • Filter at 0.01Hz
Potential Artefacts • After Averaging… • Filter Specific frequency bands • Remove persistent artefacts • Smooth data
Types of Filter • Low-pass – attenuate high frequencies • High-pass – attenuate low frequencies • Band-pass – attenuate both • Notch – attenuate a narrow band
Properties of Filters • “Transfer function” • Effect on amplitude at each frequency • Effect on phase at each frequency • “Half Amp. Cutoff” • Frequency at which amp is reduced by 50%
Problems with Filters • Original waveform, band pass of .01 – 80Hz • Low-pass filtered, half-amp cutofff = ~40Hz • Low-pass filtered, half-amp cutofff = ~20Hz • Low-pass filtered, half-amp cutofff = ~10Hz
Filtering Artefacts • “Precision in the time domain is inversely related to precision in the frequency domain.”
Filtering in the Frequency Domain B C A D E
Filtering in the Time Domain • Filtering in the time domain is analogous to smoothing • At a given point an average is calculated in relation to two nearest neighbours or more X-1 X X+1
Filtering in the Time Domain • Waveform progressively filtered by averaging the surrounding time points. • Here x = ((x-1)+x+(x+1))/3
Recipe for Preprocessing • Band-pass filter e.g.0.1 – 40Hz • Epoch • Check/View • Merge • Downsample? • Artefacts; Correction/Rejection • Filter • Average
Recommendations • Prevention is better than the cure • During amplification and digitization minimize filtering • Keep offline filtering minimal, use a low-pass • Avoid high-pass filtering
Summary • No substitute for good data • The recipe is only a guideline • Calibrate • Filter sparingly • Be prepared to get your hands dirty
References • An Introduction to the Event-related Potential Technique, S. J. Luck • SPM Manual