230 likes | 408 Views
Radar Calibration: Vertical Pointing and Self-consistency Cals. Calibrating ZDR. ZDR bias needs to be less than 0.1 dB Particularly important for improving rainfall estimation over conventional radars (especially in light rain) Particle classification Microphysical process interpretation
E N D
Radar Calibration:Vertical Pointing and Self-consistency Cals
Calibrating ZDR • ZDR bias needs to be less than 0.1 dB • Particularly important for improving rainfall estimation over conventional radars (especially in light rain) • Particle classification • Microphysical process interpretation • Techniques • Engineering measurements • Measure gains at various measurement ports in radar system • Limited in accuracy by impedance mismatch between system and probe • Causes small reflections of power • Lost power is unmeasured over several measurement ports • Impacts differential calibration • usually within 0.25 dB or so.. • Need for additional calibration • Vertical pointing calibration • Cross-polar technique
Vertical Pointing Calibration of ZDR • Use a target with known intrinsic ZDR to calibrate ZDR • Rain/drizzle drops at vertical incident appear on average round – ZDR = 0 dB • Prefer light steady rain over strong convection to avoid mean canting of drops due to shear • Can also use ice, but ZDR distribution widens • Rotate antenna through 360 deg to average out any canting of particles
Vertical Pointing ZDR Calibration Time-height plots Z (dBZ) Can’t use all of the data Some problems ZDR (dB) Need some thresholds
Vertical Pointing ZDR Calibration: Thresholds • T/R Tube recovery • After transmit the system needs time to recover • For S-Pol about 2 km • Best in pure rain – no ground clutter contamination! • RHOHV > 0.98 • LDR < -25 dB • Receiver saturation • Received power < -50 dBm • Low SNR (Noise) • Received power > -100
Vertical Pointing ZDR Calibration: Thresholds Ka-band receiver curve Receiver saturation Noise
Vertical Pointing ZDR Calibration Time-height plots Z (dBZ) Histogram of ZDR 2200 Mean = 0.0 dB s = 0.18 dB 1200 ZDR (dB) -1 –0.6 –0.2 0 0.2 0.6 1 ZDR (dB) Thresholded ZDR (dB) The mean of measured ZDR is bias! Don’t forget to take means in linear units and convert back to dB!!
Absolute calibration of Z using self-consistency principle • The specific differential phase, KDP, IN RAIN can be related to a combination of Z and ZDR • Only valid for rain (no graupel, no brightband) • The relationship depends on Drop Size Distribution (DSD) and Drop shape assumptions • Calibration technique needs to take into account: • Attenuation by rain • Differential attenuation by rain • Attenuation by the atmosphere • Requires independent ZDR calibration! • Several self-consistency calibration algorithms exist
Absolute calibration of Z using self-consistency principle: Relationships • Simulate data using Gamma DSD • Three parameter fit to DSD • Shown to represent well natural variation in DSD’s (??)
Absolute calibration of Z using self-consistency principle: Relationships • Simulate data using Gamma DSD • Three parameter fit to DSD • Shown to represent well natural variation in DSD’s (??) • m = shape factor • L = slope factor • N0 = scaling factor • D = drop diameter
Absolute calibration of Z using self-consistency principle: Relationships • Simulate data using Gamma DSD • Three parameter fit to DSD • Shown to represent well natural variation in DSD’s (??) • Run simulations over naturally occurring values of m, L and N0 as determined by observations • Ground based disdrometer • Impact • Optical • Airborne particle probes • DSD observations have many problems of their own!!! • Splash • Particle break up from high-speed aircraft • Impact disdrometers have dead time issues…..
Absolute calibration of Z using self-consistency principle: Relationships • Must assume a drop shape – many to choose from
Absolute calibration of Z using self-consistency principle: Relationships
Absolute calibration of Z using self-consistency principle: Relationships
Absolute calibration of Z using self-consistency principle: Relationships
Absolute calibration of Z using self-consistency principle: Relationships • Different relationships for different assumptions: Gamma DSD Equilibrium shape Constrained Gamma DSD Less oblate shape Constrained Gamma DSD Equilibrium shape
Absolute calibration of Z using self-consistency principle: Data • Choose rays of data with long paths through rain
Absolute calibration of Z using self-consistency principle: Computation • Compute KDP from Z and ZDR using attenuation corrections • Integrate KDP in range to get estimated PHIDP change • Compare to measured PHIDP change • Scatterplot of estimated and measured PHIDP should lie on 1 to 1 line • Compute bias in Ze
Absolute calibration of Z using self-consistency principle: Computation TRMM-LBA Z bias = 0.1
Absolute calibration of Z using self-consistency principle: Computation TIMREX Z bias = 0.03
Absolute calibration of Z using self-consistency principle: Computation
Absolute calibration of Z using self-consistency principle • Used as part of the calibration “package” • Used to check to verify the engineering calibration • If a discrepancy would be found, would trigger search for calibration error • So far, so good