340 likes | 425 Views
GRL Introduction. Lin Liu University of Toronto April 2001. Why Goal-Orientation?? van Lamsweerde (ICSE 2000). Systematic derivation of requirements from goals Goals provide rationales for requirements
E N D
GRL Introduction Lin Liu University of Toronto April 2001
Why Goal-Orientation??van Lamsweerde (ICSE 2000) • Systematic derivation of requirements from goals • Goals provide rationales for requirements • Goal refinement structure provides a comprehensible structure for the requirements document • Alternative goal refinements and agent assignments allow alternative system proposals to be explored • Goal formalization allows refinements to be proved correct and complete.
Where Are We?? object-oriented programming GRL KAOS UCM SDL UML Detailed design Architectural design Late requirements Implementation [Mylopoulos AOIS’99]
Development-World modelrefers to and reasons about… Alt-1 Alt-2 To-be As-is Operational-World models
Outline 1. Goal-oriented modeling concepts in GRL 2. An example goal-oriented non-functional requirement analysis process 3. Combined use of goal and scenario from requirement to architectural design 4. Agent-oriented concepts in GRL 5. Related works
Goal Refinement: Means-ends Link Task Refinement: Decomposition Link
Softgoal Operationalizations: Contribution Relationship Side-effects to softgoals: Correlation Relationship
Non-Intentional Elements in GRL • Acting as parameters in GRL intentional elements, i.e., topics of softgoal, “Object” attributes of goal, task and belief • Referring to entities of an external model, such as responsibilities in UCM, class/objects in UML class diagram,…
Convergence of media reduces cost of ownership Belief in GRL
Outline 1. Goal-oriented modeling concepts in GRL 2. An example goal-oriented requirement analysis process 3. Combined use of goal and scenario from requirement to architecture design 4. Agent-oriented concepts in GRL 5. Related works
Outline 1. Goal-oriented modeling concepts in GRL 2. An example goal-oriented requirement analysis process 3. Combined use of goal and scenario from requirement to architecture design 4. Agent-oriented concepts in GRL 5. Related works
An Original unbounded UCM scenario corresponding to Goal “Call Services Be Supported”
Bounded UCM scenarios of Solutions: Reside VoiceCoder in (1) Base Station; or (2) in Switch
Outline 1. Goal-oriented modeling concepts in GRL 2. An example goal-oriented requirement analysis process 3. Combined use of goal and scenario from requirement to architecture design 4. Agent-oriented concepts in GRL 5. Related works
Agent-Orientation in GRL • Actors are semi-autonomous, partially knowable • Strategic actors, intentional dependencies • Can be considered as goal-holders “Strategic Dependency” Model Meeting Scheduling Example
Revealing goals, finding alternatives • Asking “Why”, “How”, “How else”
Scheduling meeting …with meeting scheduler Consider • Technology as enabler • Networked systems and organizations • Increased inter-dependency and vulnerability • Limited knowledge and control • Openness and uncertainties • Cooperation • Boundaries, locality, identity
Outline 1. Goal-oriented modeling concepts in GRL 2. An example goal-oriented requirement analysis process 3. Combined use of goal and scenario from requirement to architecture design 4. Agent-oriented concepts in GRL 5. Related works
Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering (GORE) • GORE is gathering momentum • CSD – Feather 87… • KAOS – van Lamsweerde, … • Inquiry Cycle – Potts, Anton • EKD – Bubenko, Rolland, Loucopoulos • Win-Win – Boehm • NFR – Chung, Mylopoulos, … Hopefully, MOMENTUM >>> • Z.URN proposal to ITU-T (Nov. 2000) • GRL
Goal + scenario in RE and in Architectural Design • Krutchen’s 4+1 model of software architecture • Software Architecture Analysis Method (SAAM) • Van Lamsweerde and Willement • CREWS-L’Ecritoire approach of Collete Rolland et al.
Resources regarding GRL Home of GRL • http://www.cs.toronto.edu/km/GRL/ Tool web site • http://www.cs.toronto.edu/km/OME/ References: • Chung, L., Nixon, B.A., Yu, E.and Mylopoulos, J. Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000. • Yu, E. and Mylopoulos, J. Why Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundations of Software Quality. June 1998, Pisa, Italy. E. Dubois, A.L. Opdahl, K. Pohl, eds. Presses Universitaires de Namur, 1998. pp. 15-22. Also at: http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~eric