160 likes | 408 Views
Presentation to AUGI Meeting: 1/23/07. really more of a discussion. GIS Coops: Inter-governmental and Inter-County Opportunities, Pros and Cons (mostly Pros). Presented by: Mark Toalson GIS Manager CCRPC / CCGISC. GIS Coops: Pros - Cost Savings Improved Data Quality.
E N D
Presentation to AUGI Meeting: 1/23/07 really more of a discussion GIS Coops: Inter-governmental and Inter-County Opportunities, Pros and Cons (mostly Pros) Presented by: Mark Toalson GIS Manager CCRPC / CCGISC
GIS Coops: Pros - • Cost Savings • Improved Data Quality • GIS Coops: Cons - • Potential for loss of local control • Potential for efficiency decrease due to added bureaucracy
Winnebago County City of Rockford Rockford Park District Village of Machnesney Park North Park Public Water District Village of Cherry Valley City of Loves Park Rock River Water Reclamation District GIS Co-ops: Examples • Inter-Governmental Agreements (Intra-County) • GIS Consortiums;
GIS Co-ops: Examples • Inter-Governmental Agreements (Intra-County) • GIS Consortiums; • Cost Savings • Improved Data Quality
Champaign County Rantoul Mahomet Urbana Champaign Savoy GIS Co-ops: Examples • Inter-Governmental Agreements (Intra-County) • GIS Consortiums;
GIS Co-ops: Examples • Inter-Governmental Agreements (Intra-County) • GIS Consortiums; Typically established via formal agreement • Stabilize the Joint GIS Venture • Funding formula – critical for long term stability – shared costs benefit all • Establish “rules for engagement” - Governance / Committee structure • Policy – agreement will include policy statements or layout process to create policy
GIS Co-ops: Examples • Inter-Governmental Agreements (Intra-County) • GIS Consortiums • Local Cooperation • Consortium is not a requirement for Inter-governmental cooperation • may be less formal than a consortium – • two or more municipalities or public entities may cooperate towards one or more GIS goals
GIS Co-ops: Examples • Inter-Governmental Agreements (Intra-County) • GIS Consortiums • Local Cooperation • Inter-Agency Intra-governmental co-ops can exist within a single government – sharing resources among agencies
GIS Co-ops: Examples • Inter-Governmental Agreements (Intra-County) • GIS Consortiums • Local Cooperation • Inter-Agency • Combination of the above Intra-governmental co-ops can exist within a single government – sharing resources among agencies All three co-op types can function in a single area simultaneously
GIS Co-ops: Examples • Inter-County; Northeastern Illinois County GIS Cooperative Program
Northeastern Illinois County GIS Cooperative Program
GIS Co-ops: Cost savings • Shared resources – • Hardware: Servers, Servers, more servers • Software: SDE, IMS, ArcInfo, ..... Lizard Tech (Mr SID) $10,000 $7,100 / seat $ / Gb compressed $10,000 Installation fees: $5,000, $4500, etc. • NOW: ArcGIS Server, ArcGIS Image Server New Pricing Structure: $20,000 - $40,000 • Maintenance fees: • SDE • IMS • ArcInfo $3,000 New Maintenance Fees: $ ?! $2,000 CC Annual Maintenance 2007 $27,930.13 $3,000
GIS Co-ops: Cost savings • Shared resources – • People: GIS Manager, DB Administrator, Programmer, Web Developer, Analyst, Technician GIS is becoming entrenched in the modern workplace, GIS Salaries are on the rise People: benefits, overhead Expertise that may be unaffordable for a single entity, can be accessible when costs are shared
GIS Co-ops: Cost savings • Efficiency Gains – • People: sharing experience means less training, decreased learning curve, greater productivity • Elimination of data Redundancy: build once, use often • Standards facilitate data exchange: less time to establish apples to apples • Economic Development – • Rapid access to geo-data is powerful tool: • Power grows with local and regional cooperation: becomes tool for promoting entire regions
GIS Co-ops: Data Improvements Boundary Adjustments Seamless Data Layers Better Base Maps
Thanks for Listening GIS Co-ops: What Can We Do? • Open Invitation: Northeastern Illinois County GIS Cooperative Program • Encourage local GIS Coops within our own communities • Begin discussions of cross boundary and regional cooperation • boundary adjustment • standards • resource sharing • joint projects Who wants to discuss this? mtoalson@ccrpc.org