240 likes | 542 Views
SCOPUS - Introduction. Alvaro Ybarra Muguruza Account Manager Spain a.ybarra@elsevier.com. 21.2M pre-1996 records 29.5M post-1995 records >50M records 64k pre-1996 conf events 10.5k post-1995 c onf events 5.7M total conference records (10 %) 844k book items.
E N D
SCOPUS - Introduction Alvaro Ybarra MuguruzaAccount Manager Spain a.ybarra@elsevier.com
21.2M pre-1996 records 29.5M post-1995 records >50M records 64k pre-1996 conf events 10.5k post-1995 conf events 5.7M total conference records (10%) 844k book items • Content from > 5,000 publishers • “Articles in Press” from > 3,750 titles • Abstracts going back to 1823 • 40 languages covered • 380 M integrated scientific websites • 24M Patents The broad source for research answers 21,000 active titles 20,000 Peer reviewed journals 393 Trade journals 240 Conf. series 371 Book series A rich and extended coverage including Total average processing time: 5 days
More than 20,000 titles in Scopus, titles can be in more than one subject area Breadth of coverage across subject areas Health Sciences 6,300 • (100% Medline) • Nursing • Dentistry • etc., Social Sciences 6,350 • Psychology • Economics • Business • A&H • etc., Life Sciences 4,050 • Neuroscience • Pharmacology • Biology • etc., Physical Sciences 6,600 • Chemistry • Physics • Engineering • etc.,
Wider coverage gives a more accurate picture of the research landscape Geographical distribution of titles 0 5,000
More expansive coverage does not meanlower standards Titles are selected by the independentContent Selection & Advisory Board (CSAB) Focus on quality through selection by independent CSAB, because: • Provide accurate and relevant search results for users • No dilution of search results by irrelevant or low quality content • Support that Scopus is recognized as authoritative • Support confidence that Scopus is “reflecting the truth” • Assurance that titles selected by Scopus meet the highest ethical standards
Scopus selection criteria Minimum criteria • Peer-review • English abstracts • Regular publication • References in Roman script • Publication ethics statement
Titles reviewed (n=2,976, January 2011 – December 2012) Number of titles reviewed Acceptance rate 2012: Total 1,271 titles reviewed of which 47% accepted
The Challenge: Scholarly Name Ambiguity Researchers publish under name variations. Many researchers that too closely resemble one another. Dr. Lee Dr. Lee Dr. Lee Dr. Lee Dr. J. Lee Dr. James Lee
The Solution: The ORCID Registry Dr. Lee Dr. J. Lee Dr. James Lee Dr. James Lee 46533489 Open Research and Contributor ID (ORCID) Aims to solve the name ambiguity problem in research and scholarly communications by creating a central registry of unique identifiers for individual researchers
The (Future) Benefits of ORCID By issuing unique identifiers to all researchers, ORCID aims to facilitate discovery and evaluation for researchers, institutions, scholarly societies and publishers. 46533489
Get your own ORCID Link to add to ORCID, opens the Scopus to ORCID feedback wizard
Scopuscustomers world wide (2012 Analysis, by customer count) US: 37% China: 10% Low Penetration Mid-level Penetration High Penetration
Scopus Leading research institutes use Scopus Non-Scopus
More than 95 of the world’s top Laboratories, Institutes and Ranking Bodies use Scopus for evaluation Top decision making bodies around the world use Scopus data
More accuracy, More transparency, More options, More metrics! www.journalmetrics.com
http://www.info.sciverse.com/scopus/scopus-services/integration API integration using Scopus data Scopus Requests dynamic Scopus Cited-by number to display on website Use API to extract basic bibliographic data Title Author Basic bibliographic metadata
And finally… Books Export limit increased to 20,000 Funding data