310 likes | 435 Views
RLA/98/003. CNS/ATM SEMINAR/WORKSHOP ON INSTITUTIONAL AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS Tegucigalpa, Honduras 3O September – 4 October 2002. Paulo I. Hegedus Institutional Aspects Consultant. CNS/ATM SEMINAR/ WORKSHOP. CAR/SAM FASID Guidelines on Multinational facilities/services
E N D
RLA/98/003 CNS/ATM SEMINAR/WORKSHOP ON INSTITUTIONAL AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS Tegucigalpa, Honduras 3O September – 4 October 2002 Paulo I. Hegedus Institutional Aspects Consultant
CNS/ATM SEMINAR/WORKSHOP • CAR/SAM FASID • Guidelines on Multinational facilities/services • Institutional Issues foreseen in the CAR/SAM Region
AGENDA • I - Background • II - Specific aspects in some ANS structures • III - Guideline for Multinational facilities/services • Institutional Issues foreseen in the CAR/SAM Region • Conclusion
BACKGROUND • 10 ANC • General Planning principles - Access guarantee - National Plan - Global Character - CNS -> ATM - Progressive Introduction
BACKGROUND • Implementation Strategy • ATM Improvement – Main Flows (18) – Homogeneous Areas (9)
ANS ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES 1. AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES AIRPORTS AIR OPERATIONS 2. ANS ORGANIC STRUCTURES a) National level Government Department Autonomous Organism Public Sector Organization Private Sector
ANS ORG. STRUCTURES(CONTINUED) b) Regional/Sub-regional Level • Decentralized - States • Centralized State Delegation International Organisms Multinational Facilities/Services Joint Organizations of Fees Collection Collective Financing Agreements Private /Concessions
GENERAL GUIDELINES • Regional Planning Criteria for the Implementation of Multinational Facilities/Services • RAN CAR/SAM/3-1999- Rec. 13/2 • GREPECAS 10 - 2001- Conc. 10/5 • Objective • Art. 28 • Included in the Regional ANP
STEPS TO FOLLOW • Proposal - GREPECAS - STATES / GROUP OF STATES • Support - Objective - Financial Implications - Management - Alternative solutions • Evaluation - GREPECAS • States Consultation • Elaboration and amendment proposal - GREPECAS
FINANCIAL AND MANAGEMENT ASPECTS • COSTS CHARGED TO STATES • MANAGEMENT • INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS • ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS
INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS INTHE CAR/SAM REGIONS • Statement on ICAO Policy for the installation/operation of CNS/ATM Systems • FANS – Institutional orientation principles
CRITICAL ASPECTS • Sovereignty and National Security POLITICAL WILL • Harmonization • Duplication Facilities and Services • Coordination
CRITICAL ASPECTS • Planning • Standards • Technical Cooperation • Financing Requirements
OPERATIONAL ASPECTS – TECHNICAL ORGANIZATION • Investments magnitude • Operational advantages • Scale economics in facilities/services • Importance for ATM • Implementation of CNS systems with advanced and satellite technologies • ATS provision in large geographical areas
State Delegation States International Organizations Multinational Facilities/Services CNS - REDDIG; AMSS; SBAS ATM – Regional Centres ATM; ATFM; Mon. RVSM AIS Data Banks MET Facil./Serv. COMPARTATIVE STUDY OPTIONS
COMPARTATIVE STUDY OPTIONS • Facil./Serv. Flight Cal. • Facil./Serv. IAP/PA GNSS • TRG • SAR • JCCA • JointOrganizations of Fees Collection • Collective Financing Agreements • Private/Concessions
Institutional Criteria Operational Criteria Technical Criteria Economical Criteria Administrative Criteria Nacional Sovereignty Operational Security Maintenance Management Profitability Administrative Cost Nacional Security Operational Efficiency Systems Sharing Cost Recovery Training Labor Cost Accesibility Evolutionary Implementation Sharing of Resources Staffing Coordination CRITERIA
COMPARATIVE STUDY Facilities/Services by Options Management and Operation NA - not applicable option: < = 20 ptos. AWR - applicable with reservation option: >= 21 ptos < = 30 ptos. A - applicable option >= 31 ptos < = 40 ptos. HA - highly applicable option >= 41 ptos < = 48 ptos.
PRIORITY OF OPTIONS FOR FACILITIESS AND SERVICES INSTALLATION Types of organizations INTL ORG Mult ORG FACILITIES AND SERVICES NAC NAC DEL PRIVATE JFARR COM REDDIG P5 P3 P4 P2 P1 P1 AMSS P5 P2 P4 P3 P1 P1 SBAS P5 P2 P4 P3 P1 P1 ATM REG. ATM CENTRE P6 P4 P5 P2 P3 P3 REG. ATFM CENTRE P6 P4 P5 P1 P2 P3 REG. AIRSP.SFTY. AG. P5 P3 P4 P2 P1 P1 AIS REG. AIS DATA BANK P4 P3 P2 P1 P1 P2 MET WAFS REG. MTC.SUPP.AG. P4 P3 P2 P1 P1 P2 FLT.CAL/GNSS IAP/PA REG . FLT.CAL. AG. P4 P2 P3 P2 P2 P1 REG. GNSS IAP/PA AG P4 P3 P2 P1 P1 P1 TRG REG TRG. MGT. AG P4 P5 P2 P2 P1 P2 SAR REG.SARSAT MGT.AG. P4 P5 P6 P1 P3 P2 JCCA REG.JCCA AG. P4 P3 P3 P2 P1 P2 Comparative Study (continued)
CHARACTERISTICS OF MULTINATIONAL ORGANIZATION OPTIONS • NATIONAL Strong Pts.:CRITICAL CRITERIA (NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY/ SECURITY) Weak Pts.:OPERATINAL EFFICIENCY/ COORDINATION / INCOME ADMINISTRATIVE COST
CHARACTERISTICS OF MULTINATIONAL ORGANIZATION OPTIONS (cont.) Viable Aspects:FLIGHT CALIBRATION TRAINING SARSAT JCCR
NATIONAL DELEGATION Strong Pts.:SECURITY/EFFICIENCY OPERATIONAL COORDINATION TRAINING HUMAN RESOURCES Weak Pts.:CRITICAL CRITERIA (NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY/ SECURITY);
NATIONAL DELEGATION Viable Aspects:SARSAT, MGT. SARSAT, FLIGHT CAL. MGT. RVSM Monitoring Agency REDDIG
Private Organizations • Positive Aspects: Operational Efficiency Economic/Financing Area • Weak Aspects: Critical Criteria (NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY/SECURITY) Labor Costs SARSAT;
Private Organizations • Viable Aspects: REDDIG JCCR WAFS MTC
Multinational Org. International Org., JFARR • Positive Aspects: Attend most of the criteria with high degree of viability; • Weak Aspects: Multinational Org. - Administrative Costs Profitability International Org. Critical criteria Labor Costs JFARR - Was not yet tested in a wide context
RECOMMENDED OPTIONS • HA JFARR MULTINATIONAL ORG. INTERNATIONAL ORG. • A STATES DELEGATION PRIVATE ORG. • AWR STATES (STATUS QUO).
Next Steps • 2nd. Phase - Harmonize and adapt to ATM scenarios (Flow Profiles and States Profiles); - Propose multinational organizational structures options for the CAR/SAM ANS; - Sensitivity cost/benefits/analysis studies; - Business cases.
(continued) • 3rd. Phase - Raise the recommended options to Government high instances for the decision making. POLITICAL DECISION supported by the operational/technical and economic recommended options.
CONCLUSION • THE OPTIONS ADOPTED SHOULD ATTEND CRITICAL CRITERIA; • THE OPTIONS SHOULD ATTEND THE OPERATIONAL, TECHNICAL AND ECONOMICAL VIABILITY CRITERIA; • THE DECISION WILL BE POLITICAL. • Therefore we should have: POLITICAL WILL