150 likes | 299 Views
The effect of terrain and land surface on summer monsoon convection in the Himalayan region. Socorro Medina, Robert Houze, Anil Kumar, and Dev Niyogi. 13 th Conference on Mountain Meteorology), Whistler, BC, Canada, 12 August 2008. Orographic Precipitation in cold and warm climates.
E N D
The effect of terrain and land surface on summer monsoon convection in the Himalayan region Socorro Medina, Robert Houze, Anil Kumar, and Dev Niyogi 13th Conference on Mountain Meteorology), Whistler, BC, Canada, 12 August 2008
Orographic Precipitation in cold and warm climates ALPS – MAP (1999) OR CASCADES – IMPROVE-2 (2001) HIMALAYAS
Snow/Ice Tundra Wetland Forest Irrigated crop Thar Desert Crop Ganges Delta Savanna Shurb/Grass Dryland/crop Grass Shurb Barren • Terrain gradients • Land-ocean contrast • Land cover gradients
OBJECTIVE Observational studies (Sawyer et al. 1947, Houze et al. 2007) proposed hypotheses on how monsoon convection forms Objective: Test hypotheses (in following slides) using model simulations
Model/data used Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF v2.1.1) model with single-moment bulk microphysical parameterization with 6 water substances Complemented with NCEP data
Dominant type of systems Deep and wide convective systems Broad stratiform echoes (embedded in convective systems)
Wide convective system in western indentation3 September 2003
HINDU KUSH HIMALAYAS PAKISTAN INDIA Accumulated precipitation and terrain Domain 1 (dx = 9 km) Domain 2 (dx = 3 km)
Evaluation: 3D Reflectivity structure (~22 UTC 3 Sep [~03 LST 4 Sep]) dBZ OBSERVATION (TRMM-PR) SIMULATION Horizontal cross sections at 4 km Vertical cross sections along black line Height (km) 0 8 16 Height (km) 0 8 16 0 125 250 Distance (km) 0 125 250 Distance (km) Vertical cross sections along red line Height (km) 0 8 16 Height (km) 0 8 16 0 100 200 Distance (km) 0 100 200 Distance (km)
HYPOTHESIS: Dry line SURFACE DEW POINT DEPRESSION AND 2 AND 4 KM TERRAIN CONTOURS Valid: 18 UTC 3 Sep (23 LST) Forecast : 0 h (1 h before convection initialization)
1.0 AGL km 3.5 AGL km HYPOTHESIS: Moist low-level flow from Arabian Sea, dry flow aloft from Tibetan or Afghan mountains SURFACE MIXING RATIO (g/kg) NOAA HYSPLIT (NCEP FNL) BACKWARD TRAJECTORIES Valid: 18 UTC 3 Sep (23 LST) Forecast : 0 h End time: 18 UTC 3 Sep (23 LST) Elapsed period between markers: 24 h
HYPOTHESIS: High surface sensible heat flux as low-level air moves over Thar Desert NCEP time series
HYPOTHESIS: Convection triggered over foothills TOTAL PRECIP. MIXING RATIO TERRAIN AND COLUMN INTEGRATED PRECIPITATION HYDROMETEORS (10 mm) N 6.0 g kg-1 Valid: 19 UTC 3 Sep (00 LST). Forecast : 1 h
CONCLUSIONS WIDE CONVECTIVE CASE Moist low-level flow from Arabian Sea heated by passage over Thar Desert Western indentation of barrier allows low-level moisture and buoyancy to build up Elevated layer of dry, warm air from Afghan mountains caps the moist low-level flow Convection triggered by orographic lifting over the small peaks