200 likes | 314 Views
Technological discussions in iron and steel, 1871-1885. Carol Siri Johnson, New Jersey Institute of Technology Peter B. Meyer Research Economist, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics * SHOT conference, Las Vegas, Oct 13, 2006.
E N D
Technological discussions in iron and steel, 1871-1885 Carol Siri Johnson, New Jersey Institute of Technology Peter B. Meyer Research Economist, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics* SHOT conference, Las Vegas, Oct 13, 2006 *Views expressed here do not reflect official policies or measurements of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Mid-19th Century Ironworks Lukens Steel, circa 1895, just before being torn down Courtesy Hagley Museum and Library
Late 19th Century Ironworks Birmingham, Alabama. Courtesy IA, Robert Gordon, the Smithsonian
20th Century Ironworks Bethlehem Steel, 1931 Courtesy Hagley Museum and Library
Transactions of the American Institute of Mining Engineers (TAIME)
The American Institute of Mining Engineers and the Engineering and Mining Journal
Knowledge Transfer, the Engineering and Mining Journal andTAIME
Online Archive of PDFs at http://techterms.net/ironwork/TAIME/
Kuhn’s hypothesis • An established scientific paradigm has a specialized vocabulary • Covering its esoteric theory and subject precisely (p. 206) • Definitions are established and standard • As a paradigm is developing, communication involves translation (p. 203) • And exploring alternative definitions (p. 200) • (e.g.: “what I mean by steel is . . . “; also we see glossaries) • “The price is often sentences of great length and complexity.” (p. 203) • Mass production steel was a developing technological paradigm in 1871-1885 • Bessemer steel • Open-hearth steel • Big Steel – centralized, high volume, capital-intensive production • We look at how lengths of articles change in this developing literature. • Possibly, articles on a topic get shorter with time.
Expressions of literal uncertainty Compute the fraction of words in each article contained in these iron-related phrases: “hot blast”, “Bessemer”, “puddling”, “open hearth”, “Siemens”, “Martin”, “spiegel” This frequency is a proxy for the iron-relevance of the article. Analgously, compute the frequency the string "uncert", representing relevance of literal uncertainty. These counts across the 712 articles have a positive but tiny correlation: .0071. So articles with iron-related terms are slightly more likely to use words with "uncert" with them than other TAIME articles are. Iron-related terms were declining in frequency in TAIME although the iron sector was expanding as a fraction of the economy at large. Perhaps this was because of the rise of corporate research and development; maybe iron papers were less likely to be published in open publications like TAIME.
Layers of productive processes, advancing Production of information technology goods, in recent decades Iron and steel, 1871-1884 Earlier, more basic, "upstream" levels Later, “downstream" levels In both cases there were feedback processes by which downstream advances affected earlier stages of production