240 likes | 384 Views
Fear of Floating in Reverse: Exchange Rate Policy in the 2000s. Eduardo Levy Yeyati The World Bank & Universidad Torcuato Di Tella Federico Sturzenegger Kennedy School, Harvard Univ. & Universidad Torcuato Di Tella May, 2007. Storyboard. LYS updated: Regimes in the 2000s
E N D
Fear of Floating in Reverse: Exchange Rate Policy in the 2000s Eduardo Levy Yeyati The World Bank & Universidad Torcuato Di Tella Federico Sturzenegger Kennedy School, Harvard Univ. & Universidad Torcuato Di Tella May, 2007
Storyboard • LYS updated: Regimes in the 2000s • Fear of floating or fear of appreciation? • Fear of floating in reverse: reviving exchange rate policy • Economic impact • Final remarks: Brainstorming
Exchange rate regimes in the 2000s: Classification • Key criterion: ER variability relative to forex intervention • The intervention dimension is key to characterized exchange rate policy (as opposed to the evolution of exchange rates) and its consequences
Regime in the 2000s: Nothing changed? Source: LYS (2006)
Fear of flying: A characterization • Fear of floating’s underlying fears: • Contractionary devaluations (due to BS effects) and currency and debt crisis propensity • Dollar pricing, pass-through & inflation • Fear of flying: Leaning against the appreciation wind • Intervention to strenthen the demand for the foreign currency, to avoid/mitigate appreciation pressures • Not to be mistaken with fear of sudden stops in the aftermath of a crisis
Fear of floating? (non-floats) Source: LYS (2006)
The comeback of exchange rate policy? • Mercantilist interventions as a substitute for protection • Less specific than subsidies • Less prone to mismanagement & corruption • Fear of floating in reverse (FoFiR) • Invertion of the ER anchor problem: sustaining an undervalued currency • Instead of amplified recessions due to price rigidities… • …inflationary expansions fueled by positive real shocks. • Does it work? How?
FoFiR: leaning against the appreciation wind Additional controls: country and time FE, terms of trade, GDP of trade partners, net inflows.
…at the cost of inflation pressures Additional controls: country and time FE, dlog(M2), dlog(GDP), dl(RER), lagged dep. var.
Intervention & growth Additional controls: country and time FE, terms of trade, GDP of trade partners, net inflows, dlog(pop), lagged HP cycle, lagged GDP, lagged dep. var.
Intervention & long-term growth? Additional controls: country and time FE, terms of trade, GDP of trade partners, net inflows, dlog(pop), lagged HP cycle, lagged GDP, lagged dep. var.
Savings & investment Additional controls: country and time FE, terms of trade, GDP of trade partners, net inflows, dlog(pop), lagged dlog(GDP), savings
High dollar, low wages? Additional controls: country and time FE, terms of trade, GDP of trade partners, net inflows, lagged dlog(product), dlog(pop)
Taking stock • Distribution of regimes little changed in the 00s • But the composition of non-floats have changed • Reversed fear of floating is an increasingly popular contender • Positive on • Long-run & productivity growth • Saving & investment • Not so much on exports • Is it merely low real wages?
Fear of Floating in Reverse: Exchange Rate Policy in the 2000s Eduardo Levy Yeyati The World Bank & Universidad Torcuato Di Tella Federico Sturzenegger Kennedy School, Harvard Univ. & Universidad Torcuato Di Tella May, 2007
De facto regimes over the years: Classification • Exchange rate volatility (e): average of the absolute value of monthly changes in the exchange rate • Volatility of exchange rate changes (e ): standard deviation of monthly changes in the exchange rate • Volatility of reserves (R): average of the absolute value of monthly changes in international reserves relative to the monetary base of the previous month (both denominated in US dollars)