420 likes | 768 Views
Naturalistic Interventions: Implementing in Real Life. A Personal Connection. What’s the difference?. Naturalistic Behavioral Interventions vs Developmental Social-Pragmatic Approaches. Naturalistic Behavioral Interventions. Core assumptions: Voluntary behaviors are learned
E N D
What’s the difference? Naturalistic Behavioral Interventions vs Developmental Social-Pragmatic Approaches
Naturalistic Behavioral Interventions Core assumptions: • Voluntary behaviors are learned • Behaviors are developed and maintained • Antecedents • Consequences • Prompting, chaining, fading
Naturalistic Behavioral Interventions Because of concerns with generalization, naturalistic practices have emerged: • Incidental teaching • Mand-model • Time delay • Milieu teaching • Interrupted behavior chains • Pivotal response training (PRT)
Developmental Social-Pragmatic Interventions Core assumptions: • Social-communication skills learned in a similar developmental sequence by all children • Children learn through interactions with responsive caregivers • Follow the child’s lead, respond to all communicative attempts, emotional affect is shared, adjust language and social input
Developmental Social-Pragmatic Interventions • DIR/Floortime • Denver Model • Responsive Teaching • Hanen • SCERTS
NPDC: Naturalistic Interventions A collection of practices, including: • Environmental arrangement • Interaction techniques • Strategies based on the principles of Applied Behavior Analysis • Designed to encourage specific target behaviors based on interests by building on skills that are naturally reinforcing and appropriate.
NPDC: Naturalistic Interventions In the context of daily routines throughout the day
Step 1: Identify a target act • Social skills • Prelinguistic communication • Linguistic communication
General Goal vs. Target Act • General Goal: • Connor will increase his use of language during play. • Target Act: • Connor will use the pronouns he, she, and it correctly We’re going to pull the target act out!
Step 3: Training Team Members • Identify the team: Who will teach the skill? • Provide adequate training to team members. (http://autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/content/parent-implemented-intervention)
Step 4: Identifying Contexts for Intervention • Learner-directed activities • Free choice time • Routine activities • Snack time • Daily jobs • Planned activities • Lesson plans: Science experiment example Choice making should be built into all activities!
Step 5: Arranging the Environment to Elicit the Target Act Motivating materials Keeper of the goods Arrange the context to Encourage use of target act Maintain interest
Step 6: Eliciting the Target Act Provide both (6A) the foundation of the interaction, AND (6B) the specifics on how the communicative partner interacts with the learner
Step 6A:Engaging the learner in an interaction • Follow the learner’s lead • Be at the learner’s level • Respond to verbal and nonverbal initiations • Provide meaningful verbal feedback • Expand on the learner’s utterances
Video: Language-rich, learner-directed, reciprocal interaction http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjCHG7qvYEc
Step 6B: Using strategies derived from ABA to elicit target acts • Modeling • Mand-modeling • Modified time delay • Incidental teaching
Step 7: Use data collection to monitor progress and determine next steps
Case Study: Aidan Aidan’s activity matrix: • Review at tables • Discuss: • Pros of writing out a plan like this • How is this similar to things you already do? • What stands out as being very different? • What parts of this type of plan might be useful in your work?
Team work Complete an activity matrix for one of your target students, designed to elicit a target act from one of your priority goals. Include at least three school routines, and at least one routine from home or the community.