270 likes | 855 Views
Media Effects. The role of the mass media in American politics. What is “mass media”?. Print media (newspapers, magazines) Broadcast media (television and radio) Internet. Importance of mass media. Primary conduit of information about politics But is the media passive?
E N D
Media Effects The role of the mass media in American politics
What is “mass media”? • Print media (newspapers, magazines) • Broadcast media (television and radio) • Internet
Importance of mass media • Primary conduit of information about politics • But is the media passive? • Is the media biased or objective? • If biased, does it matter?
Traditional view of media effects • Expected effects: - information - persuasion • Experimental design • Findings: - little retention of information - little persuasion • “Minimal Effects Hypothesis”
More subtle effects • Agenda-setting • Priming • Framing
Agenda-setting • Importance of issue • Scope of issues/answers • Iyengar, Kinder and Peters study • Effect increased by - lead story status - vivid story, emotional engagement - lack of political sophistication of viewer
Priming • “Cognitive misers” • Which aspect of an issue weighs most heavily in our attitude • Iyengar, Kinder and Peters Study
Not just the news . . . • Entertainment shows may also have effects - agenda-setting - priming • Even “better” than the news - full hour on single issue - consistency from week to week • Examples
Framing! • What is the “frame” of a story? • What is the cultural or ideological context in which we place an issue?
Manipulating the frames • Klan rally - free speech - social order • Bosnian conflict - genocide - centuries of ethnic conflict
Bottom line:Media doesn’t change what we think, only how we think
Characteristics of the Media and Media Coverage (and their implications)
A look ahead • Ideological bias • Corporate control of media • Personalization/Personality Politics • Dramatization • Fragmentation
Ideological bias? • Allegations of liberal bias – journalists • Allegations of conservative bias – media owners / advertisers • Does it matter?
Corporate control of media • Limits the number of “real” news outlets • Profit motive - demand-driven news - cost-cutting measures - journalists “sell souls” for access - rush to print
Demand-driven news • Saturation coverage of ultimately non-historical events • May crowd out other stories • May “burn out” the public, make us jaded • Examples: O.J., Paris Hilton
Cost-cutting measures • “Canned” news stories (same stories in every paper) • Lack of in-depth research • Usual suspects interviewed, no diversity of viewpoints
Objectivity vs. Access • Willing to do “puff pieces” in order to get choice interviews • Embedded journalists
The rush to the presses • Use sources and tips without confirmation • Trying to predict the news • Implications - may get things wrong, and people don’t pay attention to retractions - elections: people behave strategically
Personalization / Personality Politics • Tendency to focus on issues through lens of individual “victims” • Tendency to focus on personality of candidates • Implications • May actually engage some viewers • Personality characteristics may be good cues to how politicians will actually behave • But . . . May gloss over important policy issues
Example of personalization: CNN (October 17, 2000) • “there might have been a defeat for Gore on the likeability factor.” (Bob Novak) • “Gore’s clear decision to be aggressive, to try to define very sharp differences [might make him seem] assertive and tough minded [or] rude and smug.” (Jeff Greenfield) • “In this forum, where he was answering questions and being that aggressive, it will be interesting to see whether or not it plays as [if] he was a little terrier running out and trying to answer this person’s question versus standing back and saying: You know, let me talk down to you.” (Tamala Edwards)
Dramatization • News told through narrative structure and visuals • “If it bleeds, it leads” • May result in important pieces of information being cut because they don’t fit with the narrative structure • Oversimplifies issues • Polarizes issues by playing up dramatic conflict
Fragmentation • News told in small bits (esp. w/ broadcast media) • Oversimplification • Don’t see stories in context, developing dynamic, connection between various issues and events
In sum • Many aspects of news coverage result in poor quality information and skewed decisions about which stories to cover • May not persuade us to vote Republican rather than Democratic, but these biases do affect how we think about political issues
So . . . • If media is such an important component of political life and • Media is so terrible • What can we do about it?