1 / 17

‘Political Economy After the Crisis’ Week 9 April 3, 2014

‘Institutions’ and developing countries: the importance of building state capability for implementation. ‘Political Economy After the Crisis’ Week 9 April 3, 2014. The problem: in developing countries…. Historically unprecedented rates of progress, 1960-

fauve
Download Presentation

‘Political Economy After the Crisis’ Week 9 April 3, 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ‘Institutions’ and developing countries: the importance of building state capability for implementation ‘Political Economy After the Crisis’ Week 9 April 3, 2014

  2. The problem: in developing countries… • Historically unprecedented rates of progress, 1960- • But low-hanging fruit mostly plucked • Stopped doing horrible things (at scale) • Completed (or know how to do) most ‘logistical’ tasks • Building schools, immunizing babies, paving roads • As development succeeds, importance of robust implementation capability only intensifies • Regulation, taxation, energy, criminal justice… • But trajectory of ‘institutional quality’ for most developing countries is flat, or declining • And current practice either ignores it… • …or deploys a fundamentally flawed approach • We can do better; here’s what it might look like

  3. Mostly poor to mostly rich (?), 1700 – 2100Adapted from The Escape from Hunger and Premature Death, 1700-2100by Robert Fogel (Cambridge University Press, 2004) “Nearly everyone” ? % of the world that is ‘poor’ (i.e., hungry, dying prematurely) ? “Some” 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100

  4. The best of times… • For the average person, basic indicators of human well-being have never been better • most MDGs met in most places • higher average levels of education in Bangladesh now than France in 1960 • relative (if not always absolute) levels of “dollar-a-day” poverty declining almost everywhere • Rapid decline of pandemics, crippling diseases (polio), famines, wars, etc • Charles Kenny, Stephen Pinker, Angus Deaton • Over 20th C, life expectancy almost doubled

  5. But ‘divergence, big time’...

  6. …and ‘low capability’ organizations (QoG data): few successes; most countries going backwards…

  7. ...for many (e.g., Haiti), glacial progress…

  8. … even on ‘simple’ tasks • The capability of states to implement core responsibilities remains (disturbingly) low • ‘Simple’ tasks (logistics) • Delivering mail, dispensing drivers licenses • Getting teachers, doctors to just show up • ‘Moderate’ tasks • Social protection programs (Gupta 2012) • ‘Complex’ tasks • Land reform, Criminal justice, Regulation • Stagnating, declining ‘quality of government’ • Unfinished historical tasks…

  9. Delivering the mail (literally)—testing the post office in 157 countries Includes not just Somalia and Myanmar but Tanzania, Ghana, Nigeria, Egypt, Russia, Mongolia, Cambodia, Honduras, Fiji, etc. Source: Chong, et al (2012)

  10. How current aid effort/thinking is allocated Design Effort Prestige Resources Evaluation Implementation Time

  11. Looking like a state: Isomorphic mimicry in the Solomon Islands • RAMSI: $millions spent on state-of-the-art courthouse, jail, training of judges, police… • ‘Institutions’ => ‘Success’ • …vs ‘Justice Delivered Locally’, a decentralized system of island courts responding to everyday justice concerns of everyday people • ‘Success’ => ‘Institutions’

  12. What we need Design Effort Prestige Resources Evaluation Implementation Time

  13. Implementing an alternative • Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA) • Part of the ‘Building State Capability’ Program • Center for International Development, Harvard • http://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/cid/programs/building_state_capability • Local Solutions for Local Problems • Pushing Problem Driven Positive Deviance • Try, Learn, Iterate, Adapt • Scale Learning through Diffusion • i.e., Communities of Practice

  14. How PDIA differs

  15. Origins, Applications • PDIA’s source material • History • Dan Carpenter on the origins of the US Post Office • David Tyack on the origins of the US education system • David Vincent on the origins of the UK education system • Alfred Chandler on origins of large corporations… • Complexity Theory • In biology, in nature, in computing, in cities • Social Science, Experience • Sociology of organizations (form ≠ function), ‘monocropping’ • ‘Expertise’ as a limited source of legitimacy • Applications • Health delivery reform, Indonesia • ‘Justice for the Poor’, World Bank • Public Financial Management reform (Andrews 2013) • Engaging with ‘fragile states’ • Implementation is a collective capability, learned – like every other complex task (music, languages) – by making lots of initial mistakes

  16. Which way up? RCTs vs QICs Eppstein et al (2012) “Searching the clinical fitness landscape” PLoS ONE: 7(11): e49901

  17. More details at… • Matt Andrews, Lant Pritchett and Michael Woolcock (2013) ‘Escaping capability traps through Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA)’ World Development51(11): 234-244 • Lant Pritchett, Michael Woolcock and Matt Andrews (2013) ‘Looking like a state: techniques of persistent failure in state capability for implementation’ Journal of Development Studies 49(3): 1-18 • LantPritchett, SalimahSamji and Jeffrey Hammer (2012) ‘It’s all about MeE: using structured experiential learning (‘e’) to crawl the design space’ Working Paper No. 104, WIDER (December 2012) • Michael Woolcock (2013) ‘Using case studies to assess the external validity of “complex” development interventions’ Evaluation 19(3): 229-248

More Related