470 likes | 640 Views
Virial shocks in galaxy and cluster halos. Yuval Birnboim Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. What governs evolution of galaxies?. M100 and NGC1365 (AAO). M87 (AAO). Gas & Galaxies: Common wisdom. Hubble expansion. Gravitational instability. Shock heating. Cooling.
E N D
Virial shocks in galaxy and cluster halos Yuval Birnboim Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
What governs evolution of galaxies? M100 and NGC1365 (AAO) M87 (AAO)
Gas & Galaxies:Common wisdom Hubble expansion Gravitational instability Shock heating Cooling Angular momentum Accretion to galactic spiral disk Stars, SN, feedback
Galaxy/Cluster segregation Rees & Ostriker (1977) Silk (1977) Binney(1977) White & Rees (1978): tcool<tff – one central object (galaxy) tcool>tff – hydrostatic halo + many objects (cluster) Blumenthal, Faber, Primack & Rees 86
Evolution of radii of gas shells– big halo T(k) shocked gas cooling radius disk Birnboim & Dekel 2003
Same stuff for a smaller halo T(k) no shock – Cools like crazy! disk
Ideal gas: When can gas be hydrostatic?(argument for the adiabatic case) • Gas in the halo Isentropic: Power law profile: Homologeous collapse
Start with hydrostatic equilibrium: • The gravitational acceleration is: Stable: small perturbation inwards increases the ratio of pressure to gravity
the ideal EOS: Let’s check the stability behind the shock for non-adiabatic processes: Compression time Cooling time Birnboim & Dekel 2003
Perturbation analysis of the force equation (sub-sonic) (homology)
Assume hypothetic shock there and find out. Had there been a shock here… Would’ve it been stable?
Simulation confirms analytic model: shock when eff > crit=1.43 No free parameters, no fudge factors
M* of Press Schechter Cold Flows in Halos 1013 1012 1011 shock heating Mvir[Mʘ] 2σ (4.7%) • Assuming: • Overdensity evolution • Metalicity • evolution at z>1 most halos are M<Mshock→cold flows 1σ (22%) 0 1 2 3 4 5 redshift z Dekel & Birnboim 06
Shock always forms at same mass Time(Gyr) Time(Gyr)
Cold flows and: • The galaxy bi-modality • High-z star forming galaxies • Groups and clusters
Applications - Cold flows and: • The galaxy bi-modality • High-z star forming galaxies • Groups and clusters
Bi-modality: Age vs Stellar Mass young old young old M*crit~3x1010Mʘ SDSS Kauffmann et al. 03
Transition Scale Bulge/Disk Surface Brightness HSB spheroids LSB disks M*crit~3x1010Mʘ M*crit~3x1010Mʘ SDSS Kauffmann et al. 03
Color-Magnitude bimodality & B/D depend on environment (ie. “halo mass”) environment density: low high very high Green valley disks spheroids Mhalo<6x1011 “field” Mhalo>6x1011 “cluster” SDSS: Hogg et al. 03
Halo gas and AGN feedback Feedback “strength” Hot halo 1011Mʘ Mh 1012Mʘ 1013Mʘ
Halo gas and AGN feedback Somerville et al. 2008
Hot halos and Bi-modality • Green valley - a sharp cutoff in gas accretion to galaxies • Feedback processes are “too smooth” • Formation of hot halos makes feedback effects abrupt
Applications • The galaxy bi-modality • High-z star forming galaxies • Groups and clusters
high-sigma halos: fed by relatively thin, dense filaments typical halos: reside in relatively thick filaments, fed spherically the millenium cosmological simulation
Cosmological Context MW: Halo is hot, filaments are hot. Groups, Clusters, satellites Larger than average Rhalo>>Dfilament Cold flows Always unstable (1D analysis) Dekel & Birnboim 2006
3D SPH hydro-simulations Kereš et al. 2005 Kereš et al. 2009
3D Eulerian hydro-simulations Ocvirk et al. 2008 2e12 halo, z=4 2e12 halo, z=2.5
Accretion at high-z Dekel & Birnboim 2006 Keres et al. 05-09 Agertz et al. 2009 Wechsler et al 2002, Dekel et al. 2009
Star forming galaxiesCold accretion vs. Merger induced star bursts BX/BM/sBzK, Dekel, Birnboim et al. 2009, Nature
z=2 disksSINS Hα survey Förster Schreiber et al. 2009 Daddi et al. 2004 Bouché et al. 2007
High accretion rate and galaxy structure: Clump clusters Clumps in clump clusters: M=107-109M⊙, D=~1kpc (Elmegreen et al. 07,09, SINS) Gas splashes into galaxies at ~200km/sec → Turbulence in ISM is ~50km/sec → Jeans mass goes up, disk becomes more Toomre stable Elmegreen et al. 2007
High accretion rate and galaxy structure: Clump clusters Genzel et al. 2010 Ceverino, Dekel & Bournaud 2009
Applications • The galaxy bi-modality • High-z star forming galaxies • Groups and clusters Towards a solution of the overcooling problem of clusters (the “high-risk—high-gain” part of the talk)
The cooling flow Problem in Cool Core Clusters • No cool (<1keV) gas • Star formation in brightest central galaxy lower by 10-100 than expected from cooling • BCG smaller by a factor or a few than expected (“failure to thrive”) Allen & Ebeling
Immediate suspect: AGNs Artist’s impression for supermassive black hole, NASA/JPL-Caltech M87 – HST image
Criteria for cluster heat source 1) Enough energy 2) Smooth in time (toff<tcool) 3) Smooth in space (<10kpc) 4) No explosions, please
Clusters are not smooth! Courtesy of Volker Springel
Accretion and Gravitational heating in Clusters Dekel & Birnboim 2008
Clump physics Heating by baryonic cold (10^4K) clumps • Hydrodynamic drag:
Clump physics Heating by baryonic cold (10^4K) clumps • Hydrodynamic drag • Jeans mass (Bonnor-Ebert) • K-H/R-T instabilities and clump fragmentation • DF • Conduction/evaporation (Gnat et al. 2010) Heating 1gr/cm^3 10-3gr/cm^3
Gravitational heating by clumps Murray & Lin 2004 Dekel & Birnboim 2008
5% of baryons in clumps of 108M⊙Clumps + Convection Birnboim et al. 2011, submitted
Cold gas in Perseus HVCs Conselice et al. 2001 Mass of structures: 106-108M⊙(Fabian et al. 2008)
Summary • Threshold mass for hot halo formation ~ 1012M⊙ • Crucial to matches the color magnitude bi-modality • Most stars formed through cold flows • In clusters, cold accretion in clumps actually heats!