1 / 11

INT’L TRADE LAW BASIC GATT PILLARS III

INT’L TRADE LAW BASIC GATT PILLARS III. Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # 665 Unit Six. GATT PILLARS. RECALL THE FOUR PILLARS Idea of four pillars within GATT/WTO system: 1. Most Favored Nations [two weeks ago] 2. National Treatment [last week]

fawzi
Download Presentation

INT’L TRADE LAW BASIC GATT PILLARS III

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INT’L TRADE LAW BASIC GATT PILLARS III Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # 665 Unit Six

  2. GATT PILLARS RECALL THE FOUR PILLARS Idea of four pillars within GATT/WTO system: 1. Most Favored Nations [two weeks ago] 2. National Treatment [last week] 3. Trade Liberalization (negotiated tariff reductions in trade rounds) [this week, customs law] 4. Non-Tariff Barriers & “Fair Trade” [week after next] CONSIDER WTO VIDEO AS PRINCIPLES ACROSS DIFFERENT AGREEMENTS, IDEA ALMOST OF CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES

  3. GATT AS CONST LOOK AT ARTICLES II & VII, RE SCHEDULE OF CONCESSIONS & CUSTOMS VALUATION GATT 1947 AGREEMENT Look at Art II generally on tariff negotiations, but also recognition of things like problems with domestic law (court decisions, Art II(5)); Art VII customs valuation

  4. CURRENT TREAT LOOK AT SUBSIDIARY WTO AGREEMENTS & CODES SINCE TOKYO ROUND Agreement on Implementing Art VII (Customs Valuation Agreement) Agreement on Preshipment Inspection (but post-9/11 more issues) Agreement on Rules of Origin (ROO) Harmonized Tariff Arrangements PLUS CONCEPT OF IMPLEMENTATION IN DOMESTIC LAW (CUSTOMS & IMPORT EXPORT UNDER COMMERCE DEPARTMENT)

  5. RULES OF ORIGIN TWO DIFFERENT KINDS OF ROOS 1. Non-preferential identification of goods as “foreign” (assumption basis in true info to customers; is this consistent with open commerce & free markets) 2. Preferential ROOs as with NAFTA, AFTA benefit of FTA (discuss w/ FTAs) UNDERLYING ISSUES OF COMPOSITE GOODS SAME FOR BOTH, DIFFERENT OUTCOMES (POTENTIALLY FORFEIT VS. HIGHER TARIFFS)

  6. ROOs II RE NON-PREFERENTIAL, SATISFACTORY ID What is a “conspicuous” marking? Pabrini v US [Taiwanese umbrella labels] IS CARAN D’ACHE PEN MARKING CONSPICUOUS? WHAT DOES “SWISS MADE” MEAN?

  7. ROOs III SUBSTANTIAL TRANSFORMATION RULE ON MIXED & REWORKED GOODS 1. Can work both on tariff rates (via classification) & country determinations 2. Uniroyal v US [Topsiders manufactured in part inside & outside US, elements of rule as “new name, character or use”?] WHAT IS RESOLUTION OF CARAN D’ACHE ASSEMBLY? PAINTING? SCREW TOGETHER? WHAT?

  8. CUSTOMS ENTRY CONCEPT OF ENTRY & IMPLICITLY CUSTOMS TERRITORY 1. Language of customs a geographic one (“behind customs barrier”), but a legal concept instead with exceptions a. FTZs (beloved of state development officials & local infrastructure people) i. Privileged ii. Non-privileged b. Bonded warehouses HOW DOES BMW DEAL WITH IMPORTED PARTS & ASSEMBLY? STRAIGHT OFF AT PORT OR ENTRY OR VIA FTZ & WHY?

  9. CLASSIFICATION HARMONIZED SYSTEM 1. Interpretation rules a. Classification & valuation w/ importer initially b. Interpretation i. Entireties (finished and disassembled goods) ii. Equal specificity (competing descrip) iii. Essential character (with mixed good, materials give item its character) iv. Heading last in numerical order v. Closest heading for analogous goods

  10. CLASSIFICATION CLASSIFICATION PROBLEMS Simod America v US [Italian shoes, argument about unfinished footwear vs component treatment under substantial completeness test, injection soles] Marubeni v US [Nissan Pathfinder, car vs truck treatment based on 2 versus 4 door config]

  11. VALUATION METHODOLOGIES GATT VS US LAW? Transaction value and form of business (middleman problem) Nissho Iwai American v US [rail cars] WHAT IS TREATMENT ON WALMART BUYING FROM CHINA?

More Related