140 likes | 299 Views
Unit 4: Regulation and Dispute Resolution. Day 6: Contractual Obligations and Torts Part 2. Negligence and Unintentional Torts. As we’ve seen many times before, a tort is harm caused to a person or property for which the law provides a civil remedy .
E N D
Unit 4: Regulation and Dispute Resolution Day 6: Contractual Obligations and Torts Part 2
Negligence and Unintentional Torts • As we’ve seen many times before, a tort is harm caused to a person or property for which the law provides a civil remedy. • Unintentional torts arise from injuries caused by an accident or action that was not intended to cause harm. • Most unintentional torts are caused by negligence. • Negligence is the carelessconduct that causes foreseeable harm to another person.
Each person is required to show a duty of care. • A duty of care is the obligation to foresee and avoid careless actions that might cause harm to others. • Everyone has the duty of care to everyone else under the Neighbour Principle.
The Neighbour Principle is the responsibility to owe a duty of care not to harm one’s neighbour by being careless or negligent. • As reasonable people (ordinary people of normal intelligence), we need to anticipate the consequence of an action.
A standard of care is the degree of caution or level of conduct expected of a reasonable person. • In some cases there is a specialized standard of care which means that some people, because of their training, are held to a higher duty of care. • For example, a doctor has a higher duty of care than an ordinary person. • Rescuers or Good Samaritans have a low standard of care because society wants to encourage people to help those in trouble.
Causation is the connection between someone’s actions or inactions and someone else’s injuries. • Defenses include remoteness of damage and intervening act. • For example, if the injury would not have been caused “but for” the defendants actions, such as not providing someone with a lifejacket on a boat.
Remoteness of damage means that harm could not have been foreseen by the defendant due to the lack of close connection between the wrong and the injury. • Intervening act is the unforeseeable event that interrupts the chain of events started by the defendant.
Liability Under the law of negligence, there are several types of liability. Product Liability • The area of law that deals with negligence on the part of manufacturers.
Occupiers Liability • responsibility of owners or renters to ensure that no one entering their premises is injured. • Trespassers are not covered under this liability.
Vicarious Liability • Legal responsibility for the negligence of another person. • For example, if a mechanic fails to properly fix your brakes and you have an accident, the mechanic and his employer could be held liable for the accident.
Strict Liability • The defendant is automatically liable for an injury caused by a dangerous substance or activity even if the defendant was not negligent. • For example, this is often used in cases of environmentalspills.
Defenses to Liability Contributory Negligence • negligent acts by the plaintiff that helps cause the plaintiff’s injuries Voluntary Assumption of Risk • The defense that no liability exists because the plaintiff agreed to accept the risk normally associated with the activity.
Waiver • A document signed by the plaintiff, releasing the defendant from liability in the event of an injury. Inevitable Accident • A defence that claims an accident was unavoidable due to an uncontrollable event. Act of Nature • a defense that claims an accident was caused by an extraordinary, unexpected natural event.
Explanation • a defense that claims the accident occurred for a valid reason even though the defendant took every precaution. Statute of Limitations • A law that specifies the time which legal action must be taken. • Generally 2 years throughout Ontario.